Electronic Privacy Information Center v. US Department of Commerce and Bureau of the Census

Citation: 928 F.3d 95

Court: D.C. Circuit · Filed: 2019-06-28 · Docket: 19-5031

Published

Impact Score: 0/100 — Low impact: This case is narrowly focused with minimal precedential value.

Case Overview

Electronic Privacy Information Center v. US Department of Commerce and Bureau of the Census is a court opinion from the D.C. Circuit, filed on 2019-06-28 (Docket No. 19-5031).

Precedential Status: Published. This opinion may be cited as authority in future cases.

CaseLawBrief is currently processing this opinion through our AI enrichment pipeline to generate a comprehensive plain-English summary, key holdings analysis, entity extraction, and practical legal insights. The full analysis will include multiple perspectives for legal practitioners, students, and the general public.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Case Details

Case Name	Electronic Privacy Information Center v. US Department of Commerce and Bureau of the Census
Citation	928 F.3d 95
Court	D.C. Circuit
Date Filed	2019-06-28
Docket Number	19-5031
Precedential Status	Published
Impact Score	0 / 100
Jurisdiction	federal

Related Legal Resources

D.C. Circuit Opinions federal Jurisdiction Home Search Cases Is It Legal? 2019 Cases All Courts All Topics States Rankings

About This Analysis

This AI-generated analysis of Electronic Privacy Information Center v. US Department of Commerce and Bureau of the Census was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English.

CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Related Cases

Other opinions from the D.C. Circuit:

J. Sidak v. United States International Trade Commission
D.C. Circuit Affirms ITC's No-Infringement Finding in Trade Case

D.C. Circuit · 2026-04-24
Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services v. Markwayne Mullin
Asylum seekers lack standing to challenge park shelter settlement

D.C. Circuit · 2026-04-24
United States v. All Petroleum-Product Cargo Onboard the M/T Arina
D.C. Circuit Upholds Warrantless Search of M/T Arina Cargo

D.C. Circuit · 2026-04-21
National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States v. National Park Service
NPS Concessions in Historic Park Upheld by D.C. Circuit

D.C. Circuit · 2026-04-17
Inova Health Care Services v. Omni Shoreham Corporation
Court finds Omni Shoreham liable for unpaid healthcare services

D.C. Circuit · 2026-04-17
Jane Doe v. Todd Blanche
Attorney's statements during litigation are privileged, barring defamation claim

D.C. Circuit · 2026-04-17
John Doe v. SEC
D.C. Circuit: SEC ALJs violate Appointments Clause

D.C. Circuit · 2026-04-17
Secretary of Labor v. KC Transport, Inc.
D.C. Circuit Upholds NLRB Finding of Unlawful Retaliation Against Employees

D.C. Circuit · 2026-04-17