Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center
Headline: Iowa Supreme Court Affirms Hospital Not Liable in Wrongful Death Case
Citation:
Brief at a Glance
Iowa Supreme Court upholds hospital's win in wrongful death suit, finding no sufficient evidence of negligence or causation.
- Gather all medical records meticulously when alleging negligence.
- Secure qualified expert witnesses early in the litigation process.
- Understand that conclusory statements are insufficient; specific evidence of breach and causation is required.
Case Summary
Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center, decided by Iowa Supreme Court on February 28, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. This case concerns a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the estate of Larry Joe McVay against Grinnell Regional Medical Center. The estate alleged that the hospital's negligence led to Mr. McVay's death. The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding that the hospital did not breach its duty of care and that the evidence presented did not establish proximate causation for the alleged negligence. The court held: The hospital did not breach its duty of care to the patient because the medical professionals followed the accepted standard of care in treating the patient's condition.. The plaintiff failed to establish proximate causation between the alleged negligence and the patient's death, as there was no sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the hospital's actions or inactions directly led to the fatal outcome.. The trial court did not err in excluding certain expert testimony because it was not based on a reliable methodology or sufficient factual basis.. The jury's verdict in favor of the hospital was supported by substantial evidence, and the trial court properly denied the plaintiff's motions for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict.. This decision reinforces the high burden of proof required in medical malpractice cases, particularly in establishing proximate causation. It highlights the importance of reliable expert testimony and adherence to the established standard of care for healthcare providers to avoid liability.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Case Analysis — Multiple Perspectives
Plain English (For Everyone)
A family sued a hospital, claiming its negligence caused a loved one's death. The court ruled that the family did not provide enough evidence to prove the hospital failed to provide proper care or that this failure directly led to the death. Therefore, the lawsuit was unsuccessful.
For Legal Practitioners
The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for the defendant hospital in a wrongful death action. The court held the plaintiff estate failed to generate a genuine issue of material fact regarding breach of the standard of care and proximate causation, emphasizing the necessity of expert testimony to establish these elements in medical negligence cases.
For Law Students
This case illustrates the elements required for a medical malpractice claim in Iowa: duty, breach, causation, and damages. The Iowa Supreme Court's decision highlights that conclusory expert opinions are insufficient; plaintiffs must present specific evidence demonstrating both a breach of the standard of care and that such breach proximately caused the alleged harm.
Newsroom Summary
The Iowa Supreme Court has ruled against the estate of Larry Joe McVay in a wrongful death lawsuit against Grinnell Regional Medical Center. The court found insufficient evidence that the hospital's actions constituted negligence or directly caused Mr. McVay's death.
Key Holdings
The court established the following key holdings in this case:
- The hospital did not breach its duty of care to the patient because the medical professionals followed the accepted standard of care in treating the patient's condition.
- The plaintiff failed to establish proximate causation between the alleged negligence and the patient's death, as there was no sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the hospital's actions or inactions directly led to the fatal outcome.
- The trial court did not err in excluding certain expert testimony because it was not based on a reliable methodology or sufficient factual basis.
- The jury's verdict in favor of the hospital was supported by substantial evidence, and the trial court properly denied the plaintiff's motions for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
Key Takeaways
- Gather all medical records meticulously when alleging negligence.
- Secure qualified expert witnesses early in the litigation process.
- Understand that conclusory statements are insufficient; specific evidence of breach and causation is required.
- Consult with an experienced medical malpractice attorney to assess case viability.
- Be prepared for the high burden of proof in medical negligence claims.
Deep Legal Analysis
Standard of Review
De novo review for the interpretation of statutes and the application of legal principles to undisputed facts. The court reviews the district court's rulings on summary judgment for errors of law.
Procedural Posture
The case reached the Iowa Supreme Court on appeal from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Grinnell Regional Medical Center. The estate of Larry Joe McVay had sued the hospital for wrongful death, alleging negligence.
Burden of Proof
The plaintiff (estate) bears the burden of proving negligence, which includes duty, breach, causation, and damages. The standard of proof is a preponderance of the evidence.
Legal Tests Applied
Negligence
Elements: Duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff · Breach of that duty · Causation (actual and proximate) · Damages
The court found that the estate failed to present sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding breach of duty and proximate causation. Specifically, the court determined that the medical records and expert testimony did not establish that the hospital's actions or inactions fell below the accepted standard of care or that any alleged breach was the proximate cause of Mr. McVay's death.
Proximate Causation
Elements: The injury must be the natural and probable result of the alleged wrongful act or omission. · The connection between the act and the injury must not be too remote.
The court held that the estate did not present sufficient evidence to establish proximate causation. The expert testimony did not definitively link the hospital's alleged failures to Mr. McVay's death, and the court found that any causal connection would be speculative.
Statutory References
| Iowa Code § 613.11 (2019) | Medical Malpractice - Standard of Care — This statute, though not directly cited for the outcome, underpins the legal framework for medical malpractice claims in Iowa, defining the standard of care against which healthcare providers are measured. |
| Iowa Code § 668.1 (2019) | Comparative Fault — This statute is relevant as it governs actions for damages based on fault, including negligence claims like the one brought by the estate. |
Key Legal Definitions
Rule Statements
"To establish a claim for medical malpractice, a plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care, that the defendant breached that duty, that the breach was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries, and that the plaintiff suffered damages."
"The plaintiff must present expert testimony to establish the standard of care and the breach of that standard."
"To establish proximate causation, the plaintiff must show that the injury was the natural and probable result of the defendant’s negligence and that the connection between the negligence and the injury was not too remote."
Remedies
Affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Grinnell Regional Medical Center.The estate's wrongful death claim was dismissed.
Entities and Participants
Key Takeaways
- Gather all medical records meticulously when alleging negligence.
- Secure qualified expert witnesses early in the litigation process.
- Understand that conclusory statements are insufficient; specific evidence of breach and causation is required.
- Consult with an experienced medical malpractice attorney to assess case viability.
- Be prepared for the high burden of proof in medical negligence claims.
Know Your Rights
Real-world scenarios derived from this court's ruling:
Scenario: You believe a hospital made a mistake that led to a family member's death.
Your Rights: You have the right to sue for wrongful death if you can prove the hospital breached its duty of care and that breach directly caused the death.
What To Do: Consult with an attorney specializing in medical malpractice immediately. Gather all relevant medical records and be prepared to provide expert testimony to establish the standard of care, the breach, and causation.
Scenario: You are considering suing a hospital for medical negligence but are unsure if you have enough evidence.
Your Rights: You have the right to pursue a claim if you can demonstrate a breach of the standard of care and proximate causation, supported by expert medical opinion.
What To Do: Seek a preliminary evaluation from a medical malpractice attorney. They can help assess the strength of your case, including the adequacy of potential expert witnesses and the available medical documentation.
Is It Legal?
Common legal questions answered by this ruling:
Is it legal to sue a hospital for medical negligence in Iowa?
Yes, it is legal to sue a hospital for medical negligence in Iowa, provided you can prove the elements of negligence: duty, breach, causation, and damages, typically with the help of expert testimony.
This applies to Iowa.
Can I win a medical malpractice case without an expert witness?
No, generally you cannot win a medical malpractice case in Iowa without expert testimony. Expert witnesses are crucial for establishing the standard of care and proving that the healthcare provider breached that standard and that the breach caused the injury.
This applies to Iowa.
Practical Implications
For Patients and their families considering legal action against healthcare providers.
This ruling reinforces the high burden of proof in medical malpractice cases. Patients and families must be prepared to present strong, specific evidence, particularly from qualified medical experts, to demonstrate both negligence and causation to succeed in court.
For Healthcare providers and hospitals.
The decision provides clarity on the evidentiary standards required to defeat a medical malpractice claim at the summary judgment stage. It underscores the importance of thorough documentation and adherence to the standard of care, as well as the potential defense against claims lacking sufficient expert support.
Related Legal Concepts
The failure of a healthcare professional or institution to provide the expected ... Wrongful Death
A lawsuit brought by the survivors of a person who died as a result of another p... Standard of Care
The level of care that a reasonably prudent healthcare provider would have provi... Proximate Cause
The legal cause of an injury; the primary reason why something happened, without... Summary Judgment
A judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily,...
Frequently Asked Questions (33)
Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.
Basic Questions (8)
Q: What is Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center about?
Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center is a case decided by Iowa Supreme Court on February 28, 2025.
Q: What court decided Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center?
Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center was decided by the Iowa Supreme Court, which is part of the IA state court system. This is a state supreme court.
Q: When was Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center decided?
Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center was decided on February 28, 2025.
Q: What is the citation for Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center?
The citation for Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center is . Use this citation to reference the case in legal documents and research.
Q: What was the main issue in the Estate of McVay v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center case?
The main issue was whether the estate of Larry Joe McVay presented sufficient evidence to prove that Grinnell Regional Medical Center was negligent and that this negligence proximately caused Mr. McVay's death.
Q: What did the Iowa Supreme Court decide?
The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision, ruling in favor of Grinnell Regional Medical Center. They found that the estate did not provide enough evidence to establish a breach of duty or proximate causation.
Q: What is a wrongful death lawsuit?
A wrongful death lawsuit is a civil case brought by the surviving family members or estate of a person who died due to the wrongful act or negligence of another party.
Q: What does 'proximate causation' mean in a legal context?
Proximate causation means that the defendant's action or inaction was the direct and foreseeable cause of the plaintiff's injury or death. The connection must not be too remote.
Legal Analysis (11)
Q: Is Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center published?
Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center is a published, precedential opinion. Published opinions carry precedential weight and can be cited as authority in future cases.
Q: What was the ruling in Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center?
The court ruled in favor of the defendant in Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center. Key holdings: The hospital did not breach its duty of care to the patient because the medical professionals followed the accepted standard of care in treating the patient's condition.; The plaintiff failed to establish proximate causation between the alleged negligence and the patient's death, as there was no sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the hospital's actions or inactions directly led to the fatal outcome.; The trial court did not err in excluding certain expert testimony because it was not based on a reliable methodology or sufficient factual basis.; The jury's verdict in favor of the hospital was supported by substantial evidence, and the trial court properly denied the plaintiff's motions for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict..
Q: Why is Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center important?
Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center has an impact score of 25/100, indicating limited broader impact. This decision reinforces the high burden of proof required in medical malpractice cases, particularly in establishing proximate causation. It highlights the importance of reliable expert testimony and adherence to the established standard of care for healthcare providers to avoid liability.
Q: What precedent does Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center set?
Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center established the following key holdings: (1) The hospital did not breach its duty of care to the patient because the medical professionals followed the accepted standard of care in treating the patient's condition. (2) The plaintiff failed to establish proximate causation between the alleged negligence and the patient's death, as there was no sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the hospital's actions or inactions directly led to the fatal outcome. (3) The trial court did not err in excluding certain expert testimony because it was not based on a reliable methodology or sufficient factual basis. (4) The jury's verdict in favor of the hospital was supported by substantial evidence, and the trial court properly denied the plaintiff's motions for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
Q: What are the key holdings in Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center?
1. The hospital did not breach its duty of care to the patient because the medical professionals followed the accepted standard of care in treating the patient's condition. 2. The plaintiff failed to establish proximate causation between the alleged negligence and the patient's death, as there was no sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the hospital's actions or inactions directly led to the fatal outcome. 3. The trial court did not err in excluding certain expert testimony because it was not based on a reliable methodology or sufficient factual basis. 4. The jury's verdict in favor of the hospital was supported by substantial evidence, and the trial court properly denied the plaintiff's motions for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
Q: What cases are related to Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center?
Precedent cases cited or related to Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center: Estate of Smith v. State, 885 N.W.2d 129 (Iowa 2016); Hollingsworth v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co., 716 N.W.2d 187 (Iowa 2006); Slocum v. Estes, 383 N.W.2d 533 (Iowa 1986).
Q: What is the standard of review used by the Iowa Supreme Court in this case?
The court used de novo review for statutory interpretation and the application of legal principles to undisputed facts, and reviewed the summary judgment rulings for errors of law.
Q: What evidence is required to prove medical negligence in Iowa?
To prove medical negligence in Iowa, a plaintiff must present evidence of duty, breach of that duty, causation, and damages. Expert testimony is typically required to establish the standard of care and the breach.
Q: Why did the estate's lawsuit fail?
The estate's lawsuit failed because the Iowa Supreme Court determined that the evidence presented, including expert testimony, was insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the hospital breached its duty of care or whether that breach was the proximate cause of Mr. McVay's death.
Q: What is the role of expert testimony in medical malpractice cases?
Expert testimony is crucial in medical malpractice cases to establish the accepted standard of care for healthcare providers and to explain how the defendant's actions or omissions deviated from that standard, and whether that deviation caused the harm.
Q: What is summary judgment?
Summary judgment is a court order that resolves a lawsuit without a full trial. It is granted when there are no genuine disputes over the important facts of the case and one party is entitled to win as a matter of law.
Practical Implications (5)
Q: How does Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center affect me?
This decision reinforces the high burden of proof required in medical malpractice cases, particularly in establishing proximate causation. It highlights the importance of reliable expert testimony and adherence to the established standard of care for healthcare providers to avoid liability. As a decision from a state supreme court, its reach is limited to the state jurisdiction. This case is moderate in legal complexity to understand.
Q: Can a family sue a hospital if they believe a mistake was made, even if they don't have definitive proof?
A family can sue, but they must be able to present sufficient evidence, typically including expert medical opinions, to establish the hospital's negligence and its connection to the death. Without such evidence, the case may be dismissed, as it was in this instance.
Q: What should someone do if they suspect medical negligence led to a death?
They should consult with an attorney specializing in medical malpractice as soon as possible. The attorney can help gather records, assess the case, and find appropriate medical experts.
Q: How long do I have to file a wrongful death lawsuit in Iowa?
Iowa has a statute of limitations for wrongful death claims, which is generally two years from the date of death, though specific circumstances can affect this deadline. It is crucial to consult an attorney promptly.
Q: What if the hospital's actions were questionable but not definitively proven to be the cause of death?
If the actions were questionable but not proven to be the proximate cause of death, the lawsuit will likely fail. The plaintiff must demonstrate a direct link between the hospital's alleged negligence and the death, not just a possibility.
Historical Context (2)
Q: Does this ruling set a precedent for future medical malpractice cases in Iowa?
Yes, this ruling reinforces the established legal standards for proving medical malpractice in Iowa, particularly the necessity of strong expert testimony to demonstrate breach of duty and proximate causation, especially when a hospital seeks summary judgment.
Q: Are there specific Iowa laws governing medical malpractice?
Yes, Iowa Code Chapter 668 addresses damages and comparative fault in tort actions, and general principles of negligence law, including those related to the standard of care for medical professionals, apply.
Procedural Questions (4)
Q: What was the docket number in Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center?
The docket number for Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center is 23-0243. This identifier is used to track the case through the court system.
Q: Can Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center be appealed?
Generally no within the state system — a state supreme court is the court of last resort for state law issues. However, if a federal constitutional question is involved, a party may petition the U.S. Supreme Court for review.
Q: How did the case reach the Iowa Supreme Court?
The case reached the Iowa Supreme Court on appeal after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the hospital. The estate appealed this decision, arguing that there were genuine issues of material fact for a jury to decide.
Q: What is the significance of a summary judgment ruling in a medical malpractice case?
A summary judgment ruling can end a case before trial if the court finds that there are no material facts in dispute and the defendant hospital is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, as occurred here.
Cited Precedents
This opinion references the following precedent cases:
- Estate of Smith v. State, 885 N.W.2d 129 (Iowa 2016)
- Hollingsworth v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co., 716 N.W.2d 187 (Iowa 2006)
- Slocum v. Estes, 383 N.W.2d 533 (Iowa 1986)
Case Details
| Case Name | Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center |
| Citation | |
| Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
| Date Filed | 2025-02-28 |
| Docket Number | 23-0243 |
| Precedential Status | Published |
| Outcome | Defendant Win |
| Disposition | affirmed |
| Impact Score | 25 / 100 |
| Significance | This decision reinforces the high burden of proof required in medical malpractice cases, particularly in establishing proximate causation. It highlights the importance of reliable expert testimony and adherence to the established standard of care for healthcare providers to avoid liability. |
| Complexity | moderate |
| Legal Topics | Medical Malpractice, Wrongful Death, Negligence, Duty of Care, Proximate Causation, Standard of Care, Expert Testimony Admissibility |
| Jurisdiction | ia |
Related Legal Resources
About This Analysis
This comprehensive multi-pass AI-generated analysis of Estate of Larry Joe McVay, By Thomas Mcvay, and Thomas Mcvay, Individually v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center, Grinnell Regional Medical Center d/b/a UnityPoint Health-Grinnell Regional Medical Center was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English. This case received our HEAVY-tier enrichment with 5 AI analysis passes covering core analysis, deep legal structure, comprehensive FAQ, multi-audience summaries, and cross-case practical intelligence.
CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Related Cases
Other opinions on Medical Malpractice or from the Iowa Supreme Court:
-
CMT Highway, LLC, an Iowa Limited Company v. Logan Contractors Supply, Inc., an Iowa Corporation
Contractor Breached Agreement by Refusing to Deliver Asphalt at Contracted PriceIowa Supreme Court · 2026-04-24
-
Matthew Lewis Hunter v. City of Des Moines, Iowa; and Des Moines Police Bargaining Unit, Jane Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2, John Doe No. 3, John Doe No. 4, and John Doe No. 5
Iowa Supreme Court Affirms Summary Judgment for Police in Excessive Force CaseIowa Supreme Court · 2026-04-24
-
Sarah Kingsbury v. Second Injury Fund of Iowa
Prior Injury Not Scheduled: Second Injury Fund Not Liable for Additional BenefitsIowa Supreme Court · 2026-04-24
-
Worthwhile Wind, LLC v. Worth County Board of Supervisors
Iowa Supreme Court Reverses Wind Farm Permit Denial for Lack of FindingsIowa Supreme Court · 2026-04-24
-
City of Davenport v. Office of Auditor of State of Iowa
Iowa Supreme Court Upholds Auditor's Broad Investigative PowersIowa Supreme Court · 2026-04-17
-
Dr. Paul R. Gausman v. Sioux City Community School District, Daniel D. Greenwell, Jan George, Taylor Goodvin, and Bob Michaelson
Iowa Supreme Court Affirms Summary Judgment for School District in Defamation CaseIowa Supreme Court · 2026-04-17
-
State of Iowa v. Dillon Michael Heiller
Iowa Supreme Court Upholds Implied Consent Law Against Fourth Amendment ChallengeIowa Supreme Court · 2026-04-17
-
Timothy Kono v. D.R. Horton, Inc. and D.R. Horton-Iowa, LLC d/b/a Classic Builders
Homeowner's Breach of Contract and Fraud Claims Against Builder DismissedIowa Supreme Court · 2026-04-10