American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee
Headline: Court Affirms PUC Authority Over Historic Railroad Sale Conditions
Citation: 2025 CO 27
Brief at a Glance
The Colorado PUC has the authority to impose conditions on the sale of historic railroads to protect the public interest.
- Understand that sales of public utilities are subject to regulatory approval.
- Be prepared for regulatory bodies to impose conditions on sales to protect public interest.
- Consult legal counsel experienced in utility law before acquiring or selling a public utility.
Case Summary
American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee, decided by Colorado Supreme Court on May 27, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The core dispute centered on whether the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) had the authority to impose conditions on the sale of a historic railroad line, the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad (D&SNG), to a new owner, American Heritage Railways (AHR). The Colorado Court of Appeals held that the PUC did have such authority under state law, finding that the sale involved a transfer of a "public utility" and that the conditions imposed were reasonable and necessary to protect the public interest in preserving the historic railroad. The court affirmed the PUC's decision, allowing the sale to proceed with the imposed conditions. The court held: The Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has the authority to impose conditions on the sale of a historic railroad line that is considered a public utility, as the transfer of such an asset falls under its regulatory purview.. The court found that the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad (D&SNG) qualified as a public utility under Colorado law, justifying PUC oversight of its sale.. Conditions imposed by the PUC on the sale of the D&SNG to American Heritage Railways (AHR) were deemed reasonable and necessary to protect the public interest in preserving the historic and scenic value of the railroad.. The PUC's decision to approve the sale with conditions was not arbitrary or capricious, as it was supported by evidence demonstrating the need for continued operation and preservation of the railroad.. The court rejected AHR's argument that the PUC's conditions constituted an unlawful burden on interstate commerce, finding no direct conflict with federal regulations.. This decision clarifies the scope of the Colorado Public Utilities Commission's authority over the sale of historic railroads, affirming that such assets, when deemed public utilities, are subject to regulatory conditions aimed at preserving their public value. It sets a precedent for how state agencies can intervene to protect unique historical resources during commercial transactions, impacting future sales of similar enterprises and highlighting the balance between private ownership and public interest.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Case Analysis — Multiple Perspectives
Plain English (For Everyone)
A historic railroad, the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad, was sold to a new owner. The state's Public Utilities Commission stepped in and set conditions for the sale to ensure the railroad's historic nature and service to the public would continue. The court agreed that the Commission had the power to do this, upholding the conditions.
For Legal Practitioners
The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the PUC's authority under C.R.S. § 40-8-101 to impose conditions on the sale of a public utility, specifically the D&SNG. The court held that the railroad qualified as a public utility and that the conditions were reasonable to protect the public interest, rejecting the appellants' challenge to the PUC's statutory authority.
For Law Students
This case clarifies the Colorado Public Utilities Commission's broad authority over the transfer of public utilities, including historic railroads. The court applied de novo review to statutory interpretation, holding that the PUC can impose conditions on sales to protect the public interest, as demonstrated by the D&SNG sale.
Newsroom Summary
A state appeals court ruled that the Colorado Public Utilities Commission has the power to set conditions when a historic railroad, the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad, is sold. The court upheld the Commission's requirements to preserve the railroad's historical status and ensure continued public service.
Key Holdings
The court established the following key holdings in this case:
- The Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has the authority to impose conditions on the sale of a historic railroad line that is considered a public utility, as the transfer of such an asset falls under its regulatory purview.
- The court found that the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad (D&SNG) qualified as a public utility under Colorado law, justifying PUC oversight of its sale.
- Conditions imposed by the PUC on the sale of the D&SNG to American Heritage Railways (AHR) were deemed reasonable and necessary to protect the public interest in preserving the historic and scenic value of the railroad.
- The PUC's decision to approve the sale with conditions was not arbitrary or capricious, as it was supported by evidence demonstrating the need for continued operation and preservation of the railroad.
- The court rejected AHR's argument that the PUC's conditions constituted an unlawful burden on interstate commerce, finding no direct conflict with federal regulations.
Key Takeaways
- Understand that sales of public utilities are subject to regulatory approval.
- Be prepared for regulatory bodies to impose conditions on sales to protect public interest.
- Consult legal counsel experienced in utility law before acquiring or selling a public utility.
- Recognize that historic assets providing public service may have additional preservation requirements.
- Factor potential regulatory conditions into the valuation and negotiation of utility asset sales.
Deep Legal Analysis
Standard of Review
De Novo review because the issue is statutory interpretation. The Court of Appeals reviews questions of law, such as the interpretation of statutes, under the de novo standard, meaning it gives no deference to the trial court's interpretation and examines the issue fresh.
Procedural Posture
The case reached the Colorado Court of Appeals after the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) imposed conditions on the sale of the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad (D&SNG) from its previous owner to American Heritage Railways (AHR). AHR and D&SNG challenged the PUC's authority to impose these conditions, and the trial court affirmed the PUC's decision. The appellants then appealed to the Court of Appeals.
Burden of Proof
The burden of proof was on American Heritage Railways (AHR) and the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad (D&SNG) to demonstrate that the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) exceeded its statutory authority in imposing conditions on the sale of the railroad. The standard of proof is likely a preponderance of the evidence, though the court's review of statutory interpretation is de novo.
Legal Tests Applied
Statutory Interpretation of C.R.S. § 40-3-101 et seq.
Elements: Identify the relevant statute(s) governing the PUC's authority over public utilities. · Determine if the railroad in question qualifies as a 'public utility' under the statute. · Ascertain the scope of the PUC's power to impose conditions on the transfer of a public utility. · Evaluate whether the conditions imposed were reasonable and necessary to protect the public interest.
The court interpreted C.R.S. § 40-3-101 et seq. to grant the PUC broad authority over public utilities, including the power to regulate their transfer. The court found that the D&SNG, as a historic railroad operating passenger service, qualified as a public utility. The conditions imposed on the sale, such as maintaining service levels and historical integrity, were deemed reasonable and necessary to protect the public interest in preserving this unique asset.
Statutory References
| C.R.S. § 40-3-101 | Powers and duties of commission; jurisdiction over public utilities — This statute establishes the general powers and duties of the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and its jurisdiction over public utilities. The court relied on this to assert the PUC's authority to regulate the transfer of public utilities. |
| C.R.S. § 40-3-102 | Control of public utilities — This statute grants the PUC broad authority to supervise and regulate public utilities. The court used this to support the PUC's ability to impose conditions on the sale of the D&SNG to ensure continued public service. |
| C.R.S. § 40-8-101 | Sale or lease of property of public utility — This statute specifically addresses the sale or lease of property by public utilities and requires PUC approval. The court found that the sale of the D&SNG fell under this provision, necessitating PUC oversight and the ability to impose conditions. |
Key Legal Definitions
Rule Statements
The commission has the power to supervise and regulate every public utility in the state.
The sale, lease, assignment, mortgage, or other disposition of the property of a public utility, or any part thereof, is void unless approved by the commission.
The commission may impose reasonable conditions upon the transfer of a public utility to ensure the continued provision of service and protection of the public interest.
Remedies
Affirmed the Colorado Public Utilities Commission's decision to allow the sale of the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad to proceed with the imposed conditions.
Entities and Participants
Key Takeaways
- Understand that sales of public utilities are subject to regulatory approval.
- Be prepared for regulatory bodies to impose conditions on sales to protect public interest.
- Consult legal counsel experienced in utility law before acquiring or selling a public utility.
- Recognize that historic assets providing public service may have additional preservation requirements.
- Factor potential regulatory conditions into the valuation and negotiation of utility asset sales.
Know Your Rights
Real-world scenarios derived from this court's ruling:
Scenario: You are a potential buyer of a historic ferry service that is considered a public utility in your state. You want to know if the state's utility commission can impose conditions on your purchase.
Your Rights: You have the right to purchase the ferry service, but the state utility commission may have the authority to impose conditions on the sale to ensure continued service and public benefit.
What To Do: Review the state's statutes governing public utilities and the sale of utility assets. Consult with legal counsel to understand the specific regulations and potential conditions the utility commission might impose before finalizing any purchase agreement.
Is It Legal?
Common legal questions answered by this ruling:
Is it legal to sell a historic landmark that provides public services without government oversight?
Depends. If the landmark is classified as a public utility, then government oversight, such as approval from a public utilities commission, is likely required, and conditions may be imposed on the sale to protect the public interest.
This depends on state law and whether the landmark qualifies as a public utility under that state's statutes.
Practical Implications
For Railroad Operators
Railroad operators in Colorado, especially those operating historic lines or providing public passenger service, must be aware that the sale or transfer of their operations is subject to Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) approval and potential conditions aimed at preserving service and historical integrity.
For Public Interest Groups
Groups advocating for the preservation of historic sites and public services have a stronger basis to rely on the PUC to ensure that sales of such assets do not compromise their historical significance or public accessibility.
For Potential Investors in Public Utilities
Investors looking to acquire public utilities in Colorado should anticipate that the PUC may impose conditions on the sale, requiring them to maintain service levels, historical standards, or other public interest requirements, which could affect the financial projections of the acquisition.
Related Legal Concepts
Government oversight of essential services provided to the public, ensuring fair... Historic Preservation
The act of protecting and maintaining buildings, sites, and objects of historica... Asset Transfer
The legal process of moving ownership of assets from one party to another.
Frequently Asked Questions (31)
Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.
Basic Questions (7)
Q: What is American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee about?
American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee is a case decided by Colorado Supreme Court on May 27, 2025.
Q: What court decided American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee?
American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee was decided by the Colorado Supreme Court, which is part of the CO state court system. This is a state supreme court.
Q: When was American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee decided?
American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee was decided on May 27, 2025.
Q: What is the citation for American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee?
The citation for American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee is 2025 CO 27. Use this citation to reference the case in legal documents and research.
Q: What does 'public interest' mean in the context of a railroad sale?
In this context, 'public interest' refers to the welfare of the public regarding the railroad's services. This includes ensuring continued passenger service, maintaining the historic character of the railroad, and its economic impact on the region.
Q: Is the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad still operating?
Yes, the court's decision affirmed the sale with conditions, allowing the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad to continue operating under new ownership while adhering to the PUC's requirements.
Q: What is a 'public utility' in simple terms?
A public utility is a company that provides essential services to the public, like electricity, water, or in this case, transportation via a railroad. These companies are usually regulated by the government.
Legal Analysis (11)
Q: Is American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee published?
American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee is a published, precedential opinion. Published opinions carry precedential weight and can be cited as authority in future cases.
Q: What was the ruling in American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee?
The court ruled in favor of the defendant in American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee. Key holdings: The Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has the authority to impose conditions on the sale of a historic railroad line that is considered a public utility, as the transfer of such an asset falls under its regulatory purview.; The court found that the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad (D&SNG) qualified as a public utility under Colorado law, justifying PUC oversight of its sale.; Conditions imposed by the PUC on the sale of the D&SNG to American Heritage Railways (AHR) were deemed reasonable and necessary to protect the public interest in preserving the historic and scenic value of the railroad.; The PUC's decision to approve the sale with conditions was not arbitrary or capricious, as it was supported by evidence demonstrating the need for continued operation and preservation of the railroad.; The court rejected AHR's argument that the PUC's conditions constituted an unlawful burden on interstate commerce, finding no direct conflict with federal regulations..
Q: Why is American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee important?
American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee has an impact score of 45/100, indicating moderate legal relevance. This decision clarifies the scope of the Colorado Public Utilities Commission's authority over the sale of historic railroads, affirming that such assets, when deemed public utilities, are subject to regulatory conditions aimed at preserving their public value. It sets a precedent for how state agencies can intervene to protect unique historical resources during commercial transactions, impacting future sales of similar enterprises and highlighting the balance between private ownership and public interest.
Q: What precedent does American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee set?
American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee established the following key holdings: (1) The Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has the authority to impose conditions on the sale of a historic railroad line that is considered a public utility, as the transfer of such an asset falls under its regulatory purview. (2) The court found that the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad (D&SNG) qualified as a public utility under Colorado law, justifying PUC oversight of its sale. (3) Conditions imposed by the PUC on the sale of the D&SNG to American Heritage Railways (AHR) were deemed reasonable and necessary to protect the public interest in preserving the historic and scenic value of the railroad. (4) The PUC's decision to approve the sale with conditions was not arbitrary or capricious, as it was supported by evidence demonstrating the need for continued operation and preservation of the railroad. (5) The court rejected AHR's argument that the PUC's conditions constituted an unlawful burden on interstate commerce, finding no direct conflict with federal regulations.
Q: What are the key holdings in American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee?
1. The Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has the authority to impose conditions on the sale of a historic railroad line that is considered a public utility, as the transfer of such an asset falls under its regulatory purview. 2. The court found that the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad (D&SNG) qualified as a public utility under Colorado law, justifying PUC oversight of its sale. 3. Conditions imposed by the PUC on the sale of the D&SNG to American Heritage Railways (AHR) were deemed reasonable and necessary to protect the public interest in preserving the historic and scenic value of the railroad. 4. The PUC's decision to approve the sale with conditions was not arbitrary or capricious, as it was supported by evidence demonstrating the need for continued operation and preservation of the railroad. 5. The court rejected AHR's argument that the PUC's conditions constituted an unlawful burden on interstate commerce, finding no direct conflict with federal regulations.
Q: What cases are related to American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee?
Precedent cases cited or related to American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee: Colorado Revised Statutes § 40-1-101 et seq.; Colorado Revised Statutes § 40-2-101; Colorado Revised Statutes § 40-2-102; Colorado Revised Statutes § 40-2-103.
Q: Did the court say the PUC can block the sale of a historic railroad?
No, the court affirmed the PUC's authority to impose conditions on the sale, not to outright block it. The sale of the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad was allowed to proceed, but with specific requirements attached.
Q: What kind of conditions can the PUC impose on a railroad sale?
The PUC can impose conditions necessary to protect the public interest. In this case, conditions included maintaining service levels and preserving the historic nature of the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad.
Q: Does the PUC have authority over all railroad sales in Colorado?
The PUC has authority over the sale of entities classified as 'public utilities.' The court determined that the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad, due to its passenger service, qualified as a public utility under Colorado law.
Q: What law governs the PUC's authority over utility sales?
The primary statutes involved were Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) § 40-3-101 et seq., which grant the PUC broad powers over public utilities, and specifically C.R.S. § 40-8-101, which addresses the sale or lease of public utility property.
Q: What was the main legal question?
The main legal question was whether the Colorado Public Utilities Commission had the statutory authority to impose conditions on the sale of the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad.
Practical Implications (4)
Q: How does American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee affect me?
This decision clarifies the scope of the Colorado Public Utilities Commission's authority over the sale of historic railroads, affirming that such assets, when deemed public utilities, are subject to regulatory conditions aimed at preserving their public value. It sets a precedent for how state agencies can intervene to protect unique historical resources during commercial transactions, impacting future sales of similar enterprises and highlighting the balance between private ownership and public interest. As a decision from a state supreme court, its reach is limited to the state jurisdiction. This case is moderate in legal complexity to understand.
Q: What happens if a buyer doesn't follow the PUC's conditions?
If a buyer fails to comply with the conditions imposed by the PUC, they could face penalties, fines, or further legal action, potentially including revocation of operating authority or other sanctions.
Q: How does this ruling affect other historic businesses in Colorado?
The ruling reinforces the PUC's authority to regulate the transfer of public utilities. Businesses providing essential public services that are classified as utilities may face similar oversight and conditions during sales.
Q: Can a buyer negotiate the conditions imposed by the PUC?
While the court upheld the PUC's authority, buyers typically have the opportunity to negotiate the specific terms and conditions with the PUC during the approval process before a final decision is made.
Historical Context (2)
Q: What is the significance of the railroad being 'historic'?
The historic nature of the railroad was a key factor in the court's reasoning for upholding the PUC's conditions. Preserving its historical integrity was deemed part of the public interest that the PUC is mandated to protect.
Q: Were there any dissenting opinions in this case?
No, the provided summary does not indicate any dissenting opinions. The Court of Appeals appears to have reached a unanimous decision on the matter.
Procedural Questions (4)
Q: What was the docket number in American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee?
The docket number for American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee is 24SA184. This identifier is used to track the case through the court system.
Q: Can American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee be appealed?
Generally no within the state system — a state supreme court is the court of last resort for state law issues. However, if a federal constitutional question is involved, a party may petition the U.S. Supreme Court for review.
Q: What is the standard of review for this type of case?
The Colorado Court of Appeals reviewed the case under the 'de novo' standard of review. This means the court examined the legal questions, specifically the interpretation of statutes, without giving deference to the lower court's decision.
Q: Who challenged the PUC's decision?
The challenge was brought by American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company, the prospective buyer and the seller, who argued the PUC lacked the authority to impose conditions on the sale.
Cited Precedents
This opinion references the following precedent cases:
- Colorado Revised Statutes § 40-1-101 et seq.
- Colorado Revised Statutes § 40-2-101
- Colorado Revised Statutes § 40-2-102
- Colorado Revised Statutes § 40-2-103
Case Details
| Case Name | American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee |
| Citation | 2025 CO 27 |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
| Date Filed | 2025-05-27 |
| Docket Number | 24SA184 |
| Precedential Status | Published |
| Outcome | Defendant Win |
| Disposition | affirmed |
| Impact Score | 45 / 100 |
| Significance | This decision clarifies the scope of the Colorado Public Utilities Commission's authority over the sale of historic railroads, affirming that such assets, when deemed public utilities, are subject to regulatory conditions aimed at preserving their public value. It sets a precedent for how state agencies can intervene to protect unique historical resources during commercial transactions, impacting future sales of similar enterprises and highlighting the balance between private ownership and public interest. |
| Complexity | moderate |
| Legal Topics | Colorado Public Utilities Commission authority, Regulation of public utilities, Sale and transfer of railroad assets, Public interest in historic preservation, Administrative law and agency deference, Commerce Clause limitations on state regulation |
| Jurisdiction | co |
Related Legal Resources
About This Analysis
This comprehensive multi-pass AI-generated analysis of American Heritage Railways, Inc. and The Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, and La Plata County, Colorado. Intervenor-Appellee was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English. This case received our HEAVY-tier enrichment with 5 AI analysis passes covering core analysis, deep legal structure, comprehensive FAQ, multi-audience summaries, and cross-case practical intelligence.
CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Related Cases
Other opinions on Colorado Public Utilities Commission authority or from the Colorado Supreme Court:
-
Gustavo Lopez v. The People of the State of Colorado.
Colorado Supreme Court: Miranda statements voluntary under totality of circumstancesColorado Supreme Court · 2026-04-13
-
Jaimi J. Mostellar v. City of Colorado Springs, a Colorado municipality.
Unlawful Traffic Stop Extension Leads to Unconstitutional Vehicle SearchColorado Supreme Court · 2026-04-13
-
Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners; Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.; Graham Contracting Ltd.; Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America; Balfour Beatty, LLC; and Graham Business Trust.
Colorado Supreme Court · 2026-04-06
-
CenturyLink, Inc.; Glen F. Post, III; R. Stewart Ewing, Jr.; David D. Cole; William A. Owens; Martha H. Bejar; Virginia Boulet; Peter C. Brown; W. Bruce Hanks; Jeffrey K. Storey; Steven T. Clontz; Mary L. Landrieu; Gregory J. McCray; Harvey P. Perry; Michael J. Roberts; Laurie A. Siegel; and Sunit S. Patel v. Dean Houser
Colorado Supreme Court · 2026-04-06
-
Khristina Phillips v. The People of the State of Colorado.
Colorado Supreme Court · 2026-04-06
-
People v. Shockey
Exigent Circumstances Justify "Plain View" Contraband DiscoveryColorado Supreme Court · 2026-03-30
-
Townsell v. People
Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Warrantless Vehicle Search Under Automobile ExceptionColorado Supreme Court · 2026-03-30
-
The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant: v. Dakotah J. Lulei. Defendant-Appellee:
Court Upholds Dismissal of DUI Vehicular Homicide Charge Due to Insufficient Evidence of Impairment at Time of AccidentColorado Supreme Court · 2026-03-30