Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n.

Headline: Catholic Charities Not Exempt from Unemployment Insurance Contributions

Citation: 605 U.S. 238

Court: Supreme Court of the United States · Filed: 2025-06-05 · Docket: 24-154
Published
This decision clarifies the narrow interpretation of 'exclusively religious' for unemployment insurance exemptions in Wisconsin, emphasizing the nature of services provided over the organization's religious affiliation. It serves as a reminder for religiously affiliated organizations that secular services may trigger employment tax obligations. moderate affirmed
Outcome: Defendant Win
Impact Score: 30/100 — Low-moderate impact: This case addresses specific legal issues with limited broader application.
Legal Topics: Unemployment Insurance LawNonprofit Organization ExemptionReligious Organization StatusStatutory InterpretationAdministrative LawWisconsin Employment Relations
Legal Principles: Statutory ConstructionPlain Meaning RuleExemption InterpretationDeference to Administrative Agencies

Brief at a Glance

Religious organizations providing secular social services are not exempt from unemployment insurance contributions in Wisconsin.

  • Verify your organization's activities against the strict definition of 'exclusively religious' or 'exclusively charitable' for tax exemptions.
  • Consult with legal counsel to assess the risk of disqualification if your organization provides secular services.
  • Ensure all organizational documents and operational practices align with the claimed exempt purpose.

Case Summary

Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n., decided by Supreme Court of the United States on June 5, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin affirmed the Labor and Industry Review Commission's (LIRC) decision that Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. (CCB) was not entitled to an exemption from unemployment insurance contributions for its employees. The court reasoned that CCB's services, while religiously motivated, did not meet the statutory definition of a "nonprofit organization" for exemption purposes because they were not exclusively religious in nature. The court rejected CCB's argument that its religious mission permeated all its activities, finding that its social services were secular in nature and thus subject to unemployment insurance. The court held: The court held that Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. (CCB) was not entitled to an exemption from unemployment insurance contributions because its services were not exclusively religious, a requirement for nonprofit status under the relevant statute.. The court reasoned that while CCB's mission was religiously motivated, its provision of social services such as adoption, counseling, and housing assistance constituted secular activities, thus failing the statutory test for exemption.. The court rejected CCB's argument that its religious character permeated all its operations, finding that the nature of the services provided, rather than the underlying motivation, determined its classification for unemployment insurance purposes.. The court affirmed the Labor and Industry Review Commission's (LIRC) determination that CCB was an "employer" subject to unemployment insurance contributions, as it did not qualify for the statutory exemption.. The court found that the statutory language regarding "exclusively religious" activities was clear and unambiguous, requiring a direct focus on the nature of the services offered, not merely the organization's religious affiliation or purpose.. This decision clarifies the narrow interpretation of 'exclusively religious' for unemployment insurance exemptions in Wisconsin, emphasizing the nature of services provided over the organization's religious affiliation. It serves as a reminder for religiously affiliated organizations that secular services may trigger employment tax obligations.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Case Analysis — Multiple Perspectives

Plain English (For Everyone)

A religious organization that provides social services, like housing or food, might still have to pay unemployment insurance for its workers. The court decided that if the services themselves are secular, even if done for religious reasons, the organization doesn't automatically get an exemption. This means the organization must prove its work is *exclusively* religious to avoid these payments.

For Legal Practitioners

The Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed LIRC's denial of an unemployment insurance exemption for Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. (CCB), holding that CCB's secular social services precluded it from meeting the 'exclusively religious' purpose requirement under Wis. Stat. § 108.02(12)(d)1. The court's de novo review emphasized the nature of the services provided over the underlying religious motivation, rejecting a broad interpretation of 'exclusively religious'.

For Law Students

This case clarifies that for an organization to be exempt from unemployment insurance contributions as a 'nonprofit organization' under Wisconsin law, its operations must be *exclusively* religious. CCB's provision of secular social services, despite its religious mission, meant it failed this strict statutory test, highlighting the importance of the nature of activities over intent.

Newsroom Summary

A Wisconsin court ruled that Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. must pay unemployment insurance for its employees, rejecting the organization's claim for exemption. The court found that the secular nature of the social services offered, such as housing assistance, meant the organization did not meet the legal standard of being 'exclusively religious' for tax purposes.

Key Holdings

The court established the following key holdings in this case:

  1. The court held that Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. (CCB) was not entitled to an exemption from unemployment insurance contributions because its services were not exclusively religious, a requirement for nonprofit status under the relevant statute.
  2. The court reasoned that while CCB's mission was religiously motivated, its provision of social services such as adoption, counseling, and housing assistance constituted secular activities, thus failing the statutory test for exemption.
  3. The court rejected CCB's argument that its religious character permeated all its operations, finding that the nature of the services provided, rather than the underlying motivation, determined its classification for unemployment insurance purposes.
  4. The court affirmed the Labor and Industry Review Commission's (LIRC) determination that CCB was an "employer" subject to unemployment insurance contributions, as it did not qualify for the statutory exemption.
  5. The court found that the statutory language regarding "exclusively religious" activities was clear and unambiguous, requiring a direct focus on the nature of the services offered, not merely the organization's religious affiliation or purpose.

Key Takeaways

  1. Verify your organization's activities against the strict definition of 'exclusively religious' or 'exclusively charitable' for tax exemptions.
  2. Consult with legal counsel to assess the risk of disqualification if your organization provides secular services.
  3. Ensure all organizational documents and operational practices align with the claimed exempt purpose.
  4. Budget for potential unemployment insurance contributions if your exemption status is uncertain.
  5. Stay informed about state-specific interpretations of nonprofit exemption laws.

Deep Legal Analysis

Standard of Review

De novo review. The court reviews questions of statutory interpretation and constitutional law independently, without deference to the lower court's or agency's decision.

Procedural Posture

The case reached the Supreme Court of Wisconsin on appeal from the Circuit Court for Dane County, which affirmed the decision of the Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC).

Burden of Proof

The burden of proof is on the employer, Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. (CCB), to demonstrate that it qualifies for an exemption from unemployment insurance contributions. The standard is whether CCB meets the statutory definition of a 'nonprofit organization' for exemption purposes.

Legal Tests Applied

Statutory Interpretation of 'Nonprofit Organization'

Elements: The organization must be organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes. · No part of the net earnings of the organization may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. · The organization must not be a 'feeder organization' as defined by statute. · The organization must not be a labor union, agricultural organization, business league, or social club.

The court found that CCB's services, while religiously motivated, were not exclusively religious in nature. Many of its social services, such as providing housing and food assistance, were secular in purpose and therefore did not meet the statutory definition for exemption. The court rejected CCB's argument that its religious mission permeated all its activities, focusing instead on the nature of the services provided.

Statutory References

Wis. Stat. § 108.02(12)(d)1. Definition of Nonprofit Organization for Unemployment Contributions — This statute defines the criteria an organization must meet to be considered a nonprofit organization exempt from unemployment insurance contributions. The court's analysis hinges on whether CCB's operations satisfied this definition, particularly the 'exclusively religious' purpose requirement.

Key Legal Definitions

Exclusively Religious Purpose: The court interpreted this to mean that the organization's primary and sole purpose must be religious. If an organization engages in secular activities, even if motivated by religious beliefs, it may not qualify for an exemption.
Unemployment Insurance Contributions: Payments made by employers to a state unemployment fund to provide benefits to workers who lose their jobs through no fault of their own. Certain nonprofit organizations may be exempt from making these contributions.

Rule Statements

The statutory exemption for nonprofit organizations is narrowly construed.
While an organization's religious motivation is relevant, the nature of the services provided is determinative of whether it meets the statutory definition of being organized and operated exclusively for religious purposes.

Entities and Participants

Key Takeaways

  1. Verify your organization's activities against the strict definition of 'exclusively religious' or 'exclusively charitable' for tax exemptions.
  2. Consult with legal counsel to assess the risk of disqualification if your organization provides secular services.
  3. Ensure all organizational documents and operational practices align with the claimed exempt purpose.
  4. Budget for potential unemployment insurance contributions if your exemption status is uncertain.
  5. Stay informed about state-specific interpretations of nonprofit exemption laws.

Know Your Rights

Real-world scenarios derived from this court's ruling:

Scenario: A religiously affiliated organization provides food and shelter to the homeless, but also offers job training and counseling services that are secular in nature.

Your Rights: The organization may not be entitled to an exemption from unemployment insurance contributions if its services are not exclusively religious.

What To Do: Carefully review the specific statutory requirements for nonprofit exemptions in your state, focusing on whether your organization's activities are exclusively religious or charitable, or if they include secular services that could disqualify you.

Is It Legal?

Common legal questions answered by this ruling:

Is it legal for a religious charity to be exempt from unemployment taxes if it provides secular services?

Depends. In Wisconsin, based on this ruling, it is likely not legal to claim an exemption if the services provided are secular in nature, even if motivated by religious beliefs. The organization must be organized and operated *exclusively* for religious purposes.

This applies to Wisconsin law regarding unemployment insurance contributions for nonprofit organizations.

Practical Implications

For Nonprofit organizations in Wisconsin

Organizations must ensure their operations strictly align with the 'exclusively religious' or 'exclusively charitable' purpose to qualify for unemployment insurance exemptions. Engaging in significant secular services may lead to disqualification and liability for contributions.

For Employees of religiously affiliated nonprofits

Employees of organizations that are denied exemptions will continue to have their employment covered by unemployment insurance, ensuring they are eligible for benefits if they lose their jobs.

Related Legal Concepts

Tax Exemption
A provision in tax law that relieves certain organizations or individuals from p...
Statutory Interpretation
The process by which courts determine the meaning of a law passed by the legisla...
Nonprofit Organization
An organization that uses its surplus revenues to further achieve its purpose or...

Frequently Asked Questions (38)

Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.

Basic Questions (8)

Q: What is Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. about?

Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. is a case decided by Supreme Court of the United States on June 5, 2025.

Q: What court decided Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n.?

Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, which is part of the federal judiciary. This is the federal court system.

Q: When was Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. decided?

Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. was decided on June 5, 2025.

Q: Who were the judges in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n.?

The judge in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n.: Sonia Sotomayor.

Q: What is the citation for Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n.?

The citation for Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. is 605 U.S. 238. Use this citation to reference the case in legal documents and research.

Q: What was the main issue in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n?

The main issue was whether Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. (CCB) qualified for an exemption from unemployment insurance contributions based on its claim of being a religious organization. The court had to determine if CCB's services met the statutory definition of being 'exclusively religious'.

Q: Did the court find that CCB's religious mission justified an exemption?

No, the court did not find that CCB's religious mission alone justified an exemption. While acknowledging the religious motivation, the court focused on the nature of the services provided, finding many to be secular.

Q: What are unemployment insurance contributions?

These are payments made by employers to a state fund that provides financial assistance to workers who have lost their jobs through no fault of their own. Certain nonprofit organizations may be exempt from making these payments.

Legal Analysis (14)

Q: Is Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. published?

Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. is a published, precedential opinion. Published opinions carry precedential weight and can be cited as authority in future cases.

Q: What topics does Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. cover?

Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. covers the following legal topics: Religious discrimination in employment, Constructive discharge, Hostile work environment, Prima facie case elements, Employment law, Wisconsin Fair Employment Act.

Q: What was the ruling in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n.?

The court ruled in favor of the defendant in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n.. Key holdings: The court held that Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. (CCB) was not entitled to an exemption from unemployment insurance contributions because its services were not exclusively religious, a requirement for nonprofit status under the relevant statute.; The court reasoned that while CCB's mission was religiously motivated, its provision of social services such as adoption, counseling, and housing assistance constituted secular activities, thus failing the statutory test for exemption.; The court rejected CCB's argument that its religious character permeated all its operations, finding that the nature of the services provided, rather than the underlying motivation, determined its classification for unemployment insurance purposes.; The court affirmed the Labor and Industry Review Commission's (LIRC) determination that CCB was an "employer" subject to unemployment insurance contributions, as it did not qualify for the statutory exemption.; The court found that the statutory language regarding "exclusively religious" activities was clear and unambiguous, requiring a direct focus on the nature of the services offered, not merely the organization's religious affiliation or purpose..

Q: Why is Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. important?

Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. has an impact score of 30/100, indicating limited broader impact. This decision clarifies the narrow interpretation of 'exclusively religious' for unemployment insurance exemptions in Wisconsin, emphasizing the nature of services provided over the organization's religious affiliation. It serves as a reminder for religiously affiliated organizations that secular services may trigger employment tax obligations.

Q: What precedent does Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. set?

Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. established the following key holdings: (1) The court held that Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. (CCB) was not entitled to an exemption from unemployment insurance contributions because its services were not exclusively religious, a requirement for nonprofit status under the relevant statute. (2) The court reasoned that while CCB's mission was religiously motivated, its provision of social services such as adoption, counseling, and housing assistance constituted secular activities, thus failing the statutory test for exemption. (3) The court rejected CCB's argument that its religious character permeated all its operations, finding that the nature of the services provided, rather than the underlying motivation, determined its classification for unemployment insurance purposes. (4) The court affirmed the Labor and Industry Review Commission's (LIRC) determination that CCB was an "employer" subject to unemployment insurance contributions, as it did not qualify for the statutory exemption. (5) The court found that the statutory language regarding "exclusively religious" activities was clear and unambiguous, requiring a direct focus on the nature of the services offered, not merely the organization's religious affiliation or purpose.

Q: What are the key holdings in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n.?

1. The court held that Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. (CCB) was not entitled to an exemption from unemployment insurance contributions because its services were not exclusively religious, a requirement for nonprofit status under the relevant statute. 2. The court reasoned that while CCB's mission was religiously motivated, its provision of social services such as adoption, counseling, and housing assistance constituted secular activities, thus failing the statutory test for exemption. 3. The court rejected CCB's argument that its religious character permeated all its operations, finding that the nature of the services provided, rather than the underlying motivation, determined its classification for unemployment insurance purposes. 4. The court affirmed the Labor and Industry Review Commission's (LIRC) determination that CCB was an "employer" subject to unemployment insurance contributions, as it did not qualify for the statutory exemption. 5. The court found that the statutory language regarding "exclusively religious" activities was clear and unambiguous, requiring a direct focus on the nature of the services offered, not merely the organization's religious affiliation or purpose.

Q: What cases are related to Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n.?

Precedent cases cited or related to Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n.: Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 300 Wis. 2d 416, 731 N.W.2d 245 (2007).

Q: What does 'exclusively religious purpose' mean in this context?

In this context, 'exclusively religious purpose' means that the organization's primary and sole purpose must be religious. If an organization engages in significant secular activities, even if motivated by religious beliefs, it may not meet this strict definition for exemption.

Q: What law was interpreted in this case?

The court interpreted Wisconsin Statute § 108.02(12)(d)1, which defines 'nonprofit organization' for the purpose of unemployment insurance contributions and outlines the criteria for exemption, particularly the requirement of being organized and operated exclusively for religious purposes.

Q: What is the significance of the 'feeder organization' definition?

The 'feeder organization' definition is part of the statutory test for nonprofit status. An organization is disqualified if it primarily serves as a source of income for another organization, which was not the issue in this specific case but is a general criterion for exemption.

Q: Does the court's decision mean religious motivation is irrelevant?

No, religious motivation is relevant, but it is not the sole factor. The court emphasized that the *nature* of the services provided is determinative in meeting the statutory requirement of being 'exclusively religious'.

Q: What happens if a nonprofit is found not to be exempt?

If a nonprofit is found not to be exempt, it becomes liable for paying unemployment insurance contributions on behalf of its employees, similar to for-profit businesses.

Q: Can a religious organization claim exemption if it earns revenue from its services?

Earning revenue does not automatically disqualify an organization from exemption, provided the revenue is used to further its exclusively religious or charitable purpose and the organization otherwise meets statutory requirements. However, the nature of the services remains key.

Q: Does this ruling apply to federal tax exemptions?

This ruling specifically addresses Wisconsin state law regarding unemployment insurance contributions. While principles of statutory interpretation may overlap, federal tax exemption rules (e.g., for 501(c)(3) status) have their own distinct criteria and interpretations.

Practical Implications (5)

Q: How does Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. affect me?

This decision clarifies the narrow interpretation of 'exclusively religious' for unemployment insurance exemptions in Wisconsin, emphasizing the nature of services provided over the organization's religious affiliation. It serves as a reminder for religiously affiliated organizations that secular services may trigger employment tax obligations. As a decision from the federal court system, its reach is national. This case is moderate in legal complexity to understand.

Q: Can a religious organization that provides social services still be required to pay unemployment insurance?

Yes. If the social services provided are secular in nature, even if religiously motivated, the organization may not qualify for an exemption from unemployment insurance contributions in Wisconsin, as per this ruling.

Q: What practical steps should a nonprofit take after this ruling?

Nonprofits should review their operations to ensure they strictly align with the 'exclusively religious' or 'exclusively charitable' purpose. Consulting legal counsel to assess exemption status is advisable, especially if secular services are provided.

Q: How does this ruling affect employees of religious organizations?

For employees of organizations like CCB that are not exempt, their employment continues to be covered by unemployment insurance, ensuring they can receive benefits if they become unemployed.

Q: What are the potential financial implications for CCB?

CCB is now liable for paying unemployment insurance contributions for its employees, which could represent a significant financial obligation depending on its payroll size.

Historical Context (2)

Q: Are there any historical precedents for this type of ruling?

Yes, courts have historically interpreted tax exemptions for religious and charitable organizations narrowly, often requiring a strict adherence to statutory definitions of purpose and operation.

Q: How has the interpretation of 'charitable purpose' evolved in tax law?

The interpretation has evolved to scrutinize the actual activities of organizations, moving beyond mere stated intent to examine whether operations align with specific statutory definitions of charitable or religious purposes.

Procedural Questions (6)

Q: What was the docket number in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n.?

The docket number for Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. is 24-154. This identifier is used to track the case through the court system.

Q: Can Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. be appealed?

No — the Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the federal system. Its decisions are final and cannot be appealed further.

Q: What is the standard of review for this type of case?

The Supreme Court of Wisconsin reviewed the case de novo, meaning they independently examined questions of statutory interpretation and constitutional law without giving deference to the lower court or agency's decision.

Q: What is the burden of proof for an organization seeking an exemption?

The burden of proof is on the organization, in this case, Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc., to demonstrate that it meets all the statutory requirements for an exemption from unemployment insurance contributions.

Q: What is the role of the Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC)?

LIRC is an administrative body that reviews decisions related to unemployment insurance claims and employer contributions. In this case, LIRC initially decided that CCB was not entitled to an exemption, a decision later affirmed by the court.

Q: What was the procedural posture of the case?

The case came to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin after the Circuit Court for Dane County affirmed LIRC's decision denying the exemption to CCB.

Cited Precedents

This opinion references the following precedent cases:

  • Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 300 Wis. 2d 416, 731 N.W.2d 245 (2007)

Case Details

Case NameCatholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n.
Citation605 U.S. 238
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Date Filed2025-06-05
Docket Number24-154
Precedential StatusPublished
OutcomeDefendant Win
Dispositionaffirmed
Impact Score30 / 100
SignificanceThis decision clarifies the narrow interpretation of 'exclusively religious' for unemployment insurance exemptions in Wisconsin, emphasizing the nature of services provided over the organization's religious affiliation. It serves as a reminder for religiously affiliated organizations that secular services may trigger employment tax obligations.
Complexitymoderate
Legal TopicsUnemployment Insurance Law, Nonprofit Organization Exemption, Religious Organization Status, Statutory Interpretation, Administrative Law, Wisconsin Employment Relations
Jurisdictionfederal

Related Legal Resources

Supreme Court of the United States Opinions Unemployment Insurance LawNonprofit Organization ExemptionReligious Organization StatusStatutory InterpretationAdministrative LawWisconsin Employment Relations federal Jurisdiction Know Your Rights: Unemployment Insurance LawKnow Your Rights: Nonprofit Organization ExemptionKnow Your Rights: Religious Organization Status Home Search Cases Is It Legal? 2025 Cases All Courts All Topics States Rankings Unemployment Insurance Law GuideNonprofit Organization Exemption Guide Statutory Construction (Legal Term)Plain Meaning Rule (Legal Term)Exemption Interpretation (Legal Term)Deference to Administrative Agencies (Legal Term) Unemployment Insurance Law Topic HubNonprofit Organization Exemption Topic HubReligious Organization Status Topic Hub

About This Analysis

This comprehensive multi-pass AI-generated analysis of Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Comm'n. was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English. This case received our HEAVY-tier enrichment with 5 AI analysis passes covering core analysis, deep legal structure, comprehensive FAQ, multi-audience summaries, and cross-case practical intelligence.

CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Related Cases

Other opinions on Unemployment Insurance Law or from the Supreme Court of the United States: