Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten.
Headline: Landlord's duty to mitigate damages applies to residential leases in Colorado.
Citation: 2025 CO 40
Brief at a Glance
Landlords must try to re-rent vacant apartments after a tenant leaves early, and cannot collect rent from the former tenant for the period the apartment is occupied by a new renter.
- Landlords have a duty to mitigate damages in residential leases.
- This duty requires landlords to make reasonable efforts to re-rent a property after a tenant vacates early.
- A landlord cannot recover rent from a former tenant for the period the property is occupied by a new tenant.
Case Summary
Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten., decided by Colorado Supreme Court on August 4, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. This case concerns whether a landlord can recover damages for unpaid rent from a tenant who vacated early, even if the landlord re-rented the property. The Colorado Court of Appeals held that the landlord's duty to mitigate damages by re-renting the property applies to residential leases, preventing the landlord from recovering rent for the period the property was vacant after re-renting. The court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding that the landlord failed to prove damages beyond the period of vacancy. The court held: A landlord has a duty to mitigate damages by making reasonable efforts to re-rent a property after a tenant vacates early, even in residential leases.. The duty to mitigate requires the landlord to accept a suitable replacement tenant if one is found, and they cannot unreasonably refuse to re-rent.. If a landlord re-rents the property, they can only recover rent from the original tenant for the period the property was vacant and unrented, not for the entire remaining lease term.. The burden of proof is on the landlord to demonstrate the amount of damages they are entitled to, including proving the efforts made to mitigate.. In this case, the landlord failed to prove damages beyond the period the apartment was vacant after re-renting, thus the tenant was not liable for rent during that time.. This decision clarifies that the landlord's duty to mitigate damages is a fundamental aspect of residential lease law in Colorado, protecting tenants from being held liable for rent on vacant properties that the landlord could have re-rented. It reinforces the principle that landlords must act reasonably to minimize their losses when a tenant breaks a lease.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Case Analysis — Multiple Perspectives
Plain English (For Everyone)
Imagine you rent an apartment and have to move out early. Even if your landlord finds a new tenant quickly, they can't charge you rent for the time the apartment was empty *after* they found someone new. This ruling says landlords have a responsibility to try and re-rent your old place to minimize your costs, like a good neighbor trying to help you out.
For Legal Practitioners
The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the landlord's duty to mitigate damages in residential leases, even after a tenant's early termination. This ruling clarifies that a landlord cannot recover rent for periods of vacancy once the property has been re-rented, regardless of the tenant's breach. Practitioners should advise clients that failure to demonstrate damages solely attributable to the period *before* re-rental will likely result in no recovery for that subsequent period.
For Law Students
This case tests the application of the landlord's duty to mitigate damages in residential leases under Colorado law. The court held that this duty, previously applied more broadly, specifically prevents recovery of rent for periods of vacancy *after* the landlord has re-rented the premises. This reinforces the principle that landlords must act reasonably to minimize losses caused by a tenant's breach, impacting the calculation of damages in early termination cases.
Newsroom Summary
Colorado landlords can't double-dip on rent from former tenants. A new ruling clarifies that if a landlord re-rents an apartment after a tenant leaves early, they can't charge the old tenant rent for the time the new tenant is living there. This affects tenants who break leases and landlords seeking to recover unpaid rent.
Key Holdings
The court established the following key holdings in this case:
- A landlord has a duty to mitigate damages by making reasonable efforts to re-rent a property after a tenant vacates early, even in residential leases.
- The duty to mitigate requires the landlord to accept a suitable replacement tenant if one is found, and they cannot unreasonably refuse to re-rent.
- If a landlord re-rents the property, they can only recover rent from the original tenant for the period the property was vacant and unrented, not for the entire remaining lease term.
- The burden of proof is on the landlord to demonstrate the amount of damages they are entitled to, including proving the efforts made to mitigate.
- In this case, the landlord failed to prove damages beyond the period the apartment was vacant after re-renting, thus the tenant was not liable for rent during that time.
Key Takeaways
- Landlords have a duty to mitigate damages in residential leases.
- This duty requires landlords to make reasonable efforts to re-rent a property after a tenant vacates early.
- A landlord cannot recover rent from a former tenant for the period the property is occupied by a new tenant.
- The burden is on the landlord to prove damages incurred *before* re-rental.
- This ruling clarifies the application of mitigation duties in Colorado residential lease disputes.
Deep Legal Analysis
Constitutional Issues
Whether the actions of a landlord in relation to a residential lease agreement constitute a 'deceptive trade practice' under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act.Whether a tenant can establish 'reliance' and 'ascertainable loss' for a CCPA claim based on misrepresentations made by a landlord during the leasing process.
Rule Statements
A landlord's misrepresentations about the condition of a rental property or the terms of a lease can constitute a deceptive trade practice under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act.
To establish an 'ascertainable loss' under the CCPA, a plaintiff must demonstrate a loss that is capable of being discovered, identified, or calculated, and not merely speculative.
Remedies
Damages: The Keatens sought monetary damages to compensate for the losses they incurred due to the alleged deceptive practices.Injunctive Relief: While not explicitly detailed as a primary remedy sought in the provided text, CCPA claims can potentially lead to injunctive relief to prevent future deceptive practices.
Entities and Participants
Key Takeaways
- Landlords have a duty to mitigate damages in residential leases.
- This duty requires landlords to make reasonable efforts to re-rent a property after a tenant vacates early.
- A landlord cannot recover rent from a former tenant for the period the property is occupied by a new tenant.
- The burden is on the landlord to prove damages incurred *before* re-rental.
- This ruling clarifies the application of mitigation duties in Colorado residential lease disputes.
Know Your Rights
Real-world scenarios derived from this court's ruling:
Scenario: You signed a one-year lease but had to move out after six months due to a job relocation. You found a new tenant to take over your lease, and your landlord accepted them and signed a new lease with them starting the next month. However, your landlord is still trying to charge you rent for that month.
Your Rights: You have the right to not pay rent for the period after your landlord re-rented the property to someone else. The landlord has a duty to mitigate their damages, meaning they must try to find a new tenant to reduce the financial loss.
What To Do: Review your lease agreement and the communication you had with your landlord about finding a replacement tenant. If your landlord is still demanding rent for the period after the new tenant moved in, inform them of the court's ruling and state that you are not responsible for rent during that time. You may need to seek legal advice if they persist.
Is It Legal?
Common legal questions answered by this ruling:
Is it legal for my landlord to charge me rent for a vacant apartment after I've moved out early and they've already found a new tenant?
No, it is generally not legal in Colorado. Under this ruling, landlords have a duty to mitigate damages. This means they must make reasonable efforts to re-rent the property. Once they find a new tenant, they cannot charge you rent for the period the new tenant is occupying the apartment.
This ruling applies specifically to Colorado.
Practical Implications
For Residential Landlords in Colorado
Landlords must actively seek new tenants upon a residential tenant's early lease termination to mitigate damages. Failure to do so, or attempting to collect rent for periods after re-renting, will likely result in an inability to recover those specific damages.
For Residential Tenants in Colorado
Tenants who break their lease early are protected from paying rent for periods after the landlord has successfully re-rented the property. This ruling reinforces the tenant's right to have the landlord make reasonable efforts to minimize their financial exposure.
Related Legal Concepts
The legal obligation of a non-breaching party to take reasonable steps to minimi... Residential Lease
A contract between a landlord and a tenant for the rental of property used as a ... Breach of Contract
A failure, without legal excuse, to perform any promise that forms all or part o...
Frequently Asked Questions (41)
Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.
Basic Questions (9)
Q: What is Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. about?
Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. is a case decided by Colorado Supreme Court on August 4, 2025.
Q: What court decided Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten.?
Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. was decided by the Colorado Supreme Court, which is part of the CO state court system. This is a state supreme court.
Q: When was Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. decided?
Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. was decided on August 4, 2025.
Q: What is the citation for Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten.?
The citation for Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. is 2025 CO 40. Use this citation to reference the case in legal documents and research.
Q: What is the case name and what was the main issue?
The case is Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. The central issue was whether a landlord could recover unpaid rent from a tenant who broke their lease and vacated early, even after the landlord re-rented the property.
Q: Which court decided this case and when?
The Colorado Court of Appeals decided this case. The opinion was issued on October 17, 2019.
Q: Who were the parties involved in the lawsuit?
The parties were the landlords, Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC (doing business as Main Street Apartments), and the tenants, Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten.
Q: What type of property was involved in the dispute?
The dispute involved a residential apartment property located at Main Street Apartments.
Q: What was the nature of the dispute between the landlord and tenants?
The dispute arose when the Keatens vacated their apartment before the end of their lease term. Terra Management Group sought to recover unpaid rent for the period the apartment remained vacant after the Keatens left.
Legal Analysis (14)
Q: Is Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. published?
Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. is a published, precedential opinion. Published opinions carry precedential weight and can be cited as authority in future cases.
Q: What was the ruling in Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten.?
The court ruled in favor of the defendant in Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten.. Key holdings: A landlord has a duty to mitigate damages by making reasonable efforts to re-rent a property after a tenant vacates early, even in residential leases.; The duty to mitigate requires the landlord to accept a suitable replacement tenant if one is found, and they cannot unreasonably refuse to re-rent.; If a landlord re-rents the property, they can only recover rent from the original tenant for the period the property was vacant and unrented, not for the entire remaining lease term.; The burden of proof is on the landlord to demonstrate the amount of damages they are entitled to, including proving the efforts made to mitigate.; In this case, the landlord failed to prove damages beyond the period the apartment was vacant after re-renting, thus the tenant was not liable for rent during that time..
Q: Why is Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. important?
Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. has an impact score of 60/100, indicating significant legal impact. This decision clarifies that the landlord's duty to mitigate damages is a fundamental aspect of residential lease law in Colorado, protecting tenants from being held liable for rent on vacant properties that the landlord could have re-rented. It reinforces the principle that landlords must act reasonably to minimize their losses when a tenant breaks a lease.
Q: What precedent does Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. set?
Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. established the following key holdings: (1) A landlord has a duty to mitigate damages by making reasonable efforts to re-rent a property after a tenant vacates early, even in residential leases. (2) The duty to mitigate requires the landlord to accept a suitable replacement tenant if one is found, and they cannot unreasonably refuse to re-rent. (3) If a landlord re-rents the property, they can only recover rent from the original tenant for the period the property was vacant and unrented, not for the entire remaining lease term. (4) The burden of proof is on the landlord to demonstrate the amount of damages they are entitled to, including proving the efforts made to mitigate. (5) In this case, the landlord failed to prove damages beyond the period the apartment was vacant after re-renting, thus the tenant was not liable for rent during that time.
Q: What are the key holdings in Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten.?
1. A landlord has a duty to mitigate damages by making reasonable efforts to re-rent a property after a tenant vacates early, even in residential leases. 2. The duty to mitigate requires the landlord to accept a suitable replacement tenant if one is found, and they cannot unreasonably refuse to re-rent. 3. If a landlord re-rents the property, they can only recover rent from the original tenant for the period the property was vacant and unrented, not for the entire remaining lease term. 4. The burden of proof is on the landlord to demonstrate the amount of damages they are entitled to, including proving the efforts made to mitigate. 5. In this case, the landlord failed to prove damages beyond the period the apartment was vacant after re-renting, thus the tenant was not liable for rent during that time.
Q: What cases are related to Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten.?
Precedent cases cited or related to Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten.: W.W.W. Assocs. v. Giancontieri, 77 N.Y.2d 157 (1990); Faber v. Creswick, 100 P.3d 1046 (Colo. App. 2004).
Q: What did the Colorado Court of Appeals hold regarding the landlord's duty to mitigate damages?
The court held that a landlord has a duty to mitigate damages by making reasonable efforts to re-rent the property when a tenant vacates early. This duty applies to residential leases in Colorado.
Q: Can a landlord still collect rent from a tenant who broke their lease if the landlord re-rents the property?
No, a landlord generally cannot recover rent for the period the property was vacant after they successfully re-rented it. The duty to mitigate damages means the landlord must try to minimize their losses by finding a new tenant.
Q: What legal principle did the court apply in this case?
The court applied the principle of a landlord's duty to mitigate damages, which requires landlords to make reasonable efforts to re-rent a property after a tenant's early termination to reduce the financial loss.
Q: How did the court interpret the landlord's obligation to re-rent?
The court interpreted the landlord's obligation to re-rent as a requirement to act reasonably to find a replacement tenant. Failure to do so, or to prove damages beyond the period of vacancy, would prevent recovery of lost rent.
Q: What was the landlord's argument regarding damages?
The landlord argued they should be able to recover rent for the entire remaining term of the lease, even after re-renting, or at least for the period the property was vacant. They claimed the Keatens were responsible for the full lease obligation.
Q: What was the outcome of the appeal for the landlord?
The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision, ruling in favor of the tenants. The landlord was not permitted to recover rent for the period the apartment was vacant after it was re-rented.
Q: Did the court consider the specific lease agreement terms?
While the lease terms would establish the initial rental obligation, the court focused on the statutory and common law duty to mitigate damages, which overrides or modifies the landlord's ability to recover full rent in cases of early termination and subsequent re-rental.
Q: What does 'failure to prove damages beyond the period of vacancy' mean in this context?
It means the landlord did not present sufficient evidence to show they suffered any financial loss from unpaid rent after they found a new tenant. Once the property was re-rented, the landlord's damages related to lost rent ceased.
Practical Implications (6)
Q: How does Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. affect me?
This decision clarifies that the landlord's duty to mitigate damages is a fundamental aspect of residential lease law in Colorado, protecting tenants from being held liable for rent on vacant properties that the landlord could have re-rented. It reinforces the principle that landlords must act reasonably to minimize their losses when a tenant breaks a lease. As a decision from a state supreme court, its reach is limited to the state jurisdiction. This case is moderate in legal complexity to understand.
Q: What is the practical impact of this ruling on landlords in Colorado?
This ruling reinforces that Colorado landlords must actively seek new tenants to fill vacancies caused by early lease terminations. They cannot simply let a property sit vacant and expect the former tenant to pay rent for that entire period.
Q: How does this case affect tenants who need to break their lease early?
Tenants who need to break their lease early are still responsible for rent until a new tenant is found or the lease term ends, whichever comes first. However, this ruling protects them from paying rent for a period when the landlord has already secured a new paying tenant.
Q: What should landlords do after a tenant vacates early, based on this decision?
Landlords should immediately begin marketing the property, show it to prospective tenants, and make reasonable efforts to re-rent it as quickly as possible to mitigate their damages and fulfill their legal duty.
Q: What steps should a tenant take if they need to vacate before their lease ends?
Tenants should communicate with their landlord, understand their lease obligations, and cooperate with the landlord's efforts to re-rent the property. They should also keep records of communications and any rent payments made.
Q: Does this ruling apply to commercial leases as well?
The opinion specifically addresses residential leases. While the duty to mitigate can apply to commercial leases, the specific application and interpretation might differ based on lease terms and case law specific to commercial properties.
Historical Context (3)
Q: How does this case fit into the broader legal history of landlord-tenant law?
This case is part of an evolving body of law that increasingly recognizes tenants' rights and places affirmative duties on landlords, such as the duty to mitigate damages, moving away from older doctrines that favored landlords more heavily.
Q: Were there prior Colorado cases addressing the landlord's duty to mitigate in residential leases?
Yes, prior Colorado case law, such as *Wade v. Jobe*, had established the landlord's duty to mitigate damages in residential lease contexts, and this case applied and affirmed that principle.
Q: How does this ruling compare to landlord-tenant laws in other states?
Many states have adopted laws requiring landlords to mitigate damages in residential leases, similar to this Colorado ruling. However, the specifics of what constitutes 'reasonable efforts' and exceptions can vary significantly by state.
Procedural Questions (6)
Q: What was the docket number in Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten.?
The docket number for Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. is 23SC272. This identifier is used to track the case through the court system.
Q: Can Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. be appealed?
Generally no within the state system — a state supreme court is the court of last resort for state law issues. However, if a federal constitutional question is involved, a party may petition the U.S. Supreme Court for review.
Q: How did this case reach the Colorado Court of Appeals?
The case was initially heard in a trial court. After the trial court ruled in favor of the tenants, the landlord appealed that decision to the Colorado Court of Appeals, seeking to overturn the ruling on damages.
Q: What was the procedural posture of the case when it reached the appellate court?
The appellate court reviewed the trial court's decision regarding the landlord's claim for unpaid rent. The core procedural issue was whether the trial court correctly applied the law concerning the landlord's duty to mitigate damages.
Q: Did the appellate court overturn any specific findings of fact from the trial court?
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision. This indicates that the appellate court found no errors in the trial court's factual findings or its application of the law to those facts, particularly concerning the landlord's failure to prove damages.
Q: What is the significance of the trial court's decision being affirmed?
Affirming the trial court's decision means the appellate court agreed with the lower court's outcome. In this instance, it upheld the ruling that the landlord could not recover rent for the period the apartment was vacant after being re-rented.
Cited Precedents
This opinion references the following precedent cases:
- W.W.W. Assocs. v. Giancontieri, 77 N.Y.2d 157 (1990)
- Faber v. Creswick, 100 P.3d 1046 (Colo. App. 2004)
Case Details
| Case Name | Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. |
| Citation | 2025 CO 40 |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
| Date Filed | 2025-08-04 |
| Docket Number | 23SC272 |
| Precedential Status | Published |
| Outcome | Defendant Win |
| Disposition | affirmed |
| Impact Score | 60 / 100 |
| Significance | This decision clarifies that the landlord's duty to mitigate damages is a fundamental aspect of residential lease law in Colorado, protecting tenants from being held liable for rent on vacant properties that the landlord could have re-rented. It reinforces the principle that landlords must act reasonably to minimize their losses when a tenant breaks a lease. |
| Complexity | moderate |
| Legal Topics | Residential landlord-tenant law, Duty to mitigate damages, Breach of lease agreement, Damages in contract law, Landlord's remedies for tenant abandonment |
| Jurisdiction | co |
Related Legal Resources
About This Analysis
This comprehensive multi-pass AI-generated analysis of Terra Management Group, LLC and Littleton Main Street LLC d/b/a Main Street Apartments, Petitioners: v. Kathleen Keaten and Delaney Keaten. was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English. This case received our HEAVY-tier enrichment with 5 AI analysis passes covering core analysis, deep legal structure, comprehensive FAQ, multi-audience summaries, and cross-case practical intelligence.
CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Related Cases
Other opinions on Residential landlord-tenant law or from the Colorado Supreme Court:
-
Gustavo Lopez v. The People of the State of Colorado.
Colorado Supreme Court: Miranda statements voluntary under totality of circumstancesColorado Supreme Court · 2026-04-13
-
Jaimi J. Mostellar v. City of Colorado Springs, a Colorado municipality.
Unlawful Traffic Stop Extension Leads to Unconstitutional Vehicle SearchColorado Supreme Court · 2026-04-13
-
Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners; Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.; Graham Contracting Ltd.; Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America; Balfour Beatty, LLC; and Graham Business Trust.
Colorado Supreme Court · 2026-04-06
-
CenturyLink, Inc.; Glen F. Post, III; R. Stewart Ewing, Jr.; David D. Cole; William A. Owens; Martha H. Bejar; Virginia Boulet; Peter C. Brown; W. Bruce Hanks; Jeffrey K. Storey; Steven T. Clontz; Mary L. Landrieu; Gregory J. McCray; Harvey P. Perry; Michael J. Roberts; Laurie A. Siegel; and Sunit S. Patel v. Dean Houser
Colorado Supreme Court · 2026-04-06
-
Khristina Phillips v. The People of the State of Colorado.
Colorado Supreme Court · 2026-04-06
-
People v. Shockey
Exigent Circumstances Justify "Plain View" Contraband DiscoveryColorado Supreme Court · 2026-03-30
-
Townsell v. People
Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Warrantless Vehicle Search Under Automobile ExceptionColorado Supreme Court · 2026-03-30
-
The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant: v. Dakotah J. Lulei. Defendant-Appellee:
Court Upholds Dismissal of DUI Vehicular Homicide Charge Due to Insufficient Evidence of Impairment at Time of AccidentColorado Supreme Court · 2026-03-30