Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steven D. Johnson
Headline: Wisconsin Supreme Court Suspends Attorney Steven D. Johnson's License for 60 Days Due to Professional Misconduct
Case Summary
The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed a complaint against attorney Steven D. Johnson, alleging he engaged in professional misconduct. Specifically, Johnson was accused of failing to properly represent his clients, neglecting their cases, and failing to communicate with them. The Wisconsin Supreme Court reviewed the findings of a referee who had determined that Johnson committed several violations of the attorney disciplinary rules. The Court agreed with the referee's findings and concluded that Johnson's actions constituted professional misconduct. As a result, the Court suspended Johnson's law license for 60 days.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Key Holdings
The court established the following key holdings in this case:
- An attorney's failure to diligently pursue a client's case, communicate with the client, and respond to reasonable requests for information constitutes professional misconduct.
- Neglecting client matters and failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client violates attorney disciplinary rules.
- A 60-day suspension of an attorney's license is an appropriate sanction for multiple instances of professional misconduct involving client neglect and lack of communication.
Entities and Participants
Parties
- Office of Lawyer Regulation (company)
- Steven D. Johnson (party)
- Wisconsin Supreme Court (company)
Frequently Asked Questions (4)
Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.
Basic Questions (4)
Q: What was the main issue in this case?
The case involved allegations of professional misconduct against attorney Steven D. Johnson, including neglecting client cases and failing to communicate with clients.
Q: Who brought the complaint against the attorney?
The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed the complaint.
Q: What did the Wisconsin Supreme Court decide?
The Court agreed with the referee's findings that Johnson committed professional misconduct and suspended his law license for 60 days.
Q: What specific actions by the attorney were considered misconduct?
Johnson failed to diligently represent clients, neglected their cases, and did not communicate with them.
Case Details
| Case Name | Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steven D. Johnson |
| Court | wis |
| Date Filed | 2025-10-10 |
| Docket Number | 2022AP000011-D |
| Outcome | Plaintiff Win |
| Impact Score | 45 / 100 |
| Legal Topics | attorney discipline, professional misconduct, client representation, neglect of legal matters, communication with clients |
| Jurisdiction | wi |
About This Analysis
This AI-generated analysis of Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steven D. Johnson was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English.
CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.