Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc.
Headline: HOA's Authority to Fine for RV Parking Upheld
Citation:
Brief at a Glance
Homeowners Associations can fine residents for violating deed restrictions, like improper RV parking, if they follow the rules for enforcement.
- HOAs have the authority to levy fines for violations of clear deed restrictions.
- Proper procedural notice and adherence to governing documents are crucial for HOA fine enforcement.
- Deed restrictions regarding vehicle parking, including RVs, are generally enforceable.
Case Summary
Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc., decided by Texas Court of Appeals on January 22, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The dispute centered on whether the Caballito Del Mar Homeowners Association (HOA) had the authority to impose fines on Steve Geerah for alleged violations of its deed restrictions, specifically regarding the parking of his RV. Geerah argued the HOA lacked the authority to levy fines and that the restrictions were improperly enforced. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding that the HOA had the authority to impose fines and that Geerah's RV parking violated the deed restrictions. The court held: The court held that the HOA had the authority to impose fines for violations of its deed restrictions, as this power was granted by the governing documents and Texas Property Code.. The court found that Geerah's RV was parked in violation of the deed restrictions, which prohibited the parking of "recreational vehicles" in driveways or front yards.. The court determined that the HOA's enforcement of the deed restrictions was not arbitrary or capricious, as Geerah was given notice of the violations and an opportunity to cure.. The court affirmed the trial court's award of attorney's fees to the HOA, finding it was reasonable and necessary given the litigation.. The court rejected Geerah's argument that the deed restrictions were ambiguous, finding the language regarding RV parking to be clear and unambiguous.. This case reinforces the broad authority of HOAs in Texas to enforce deed restrictions and levy fines, provided such powers are clearly outlined in their governing documents and Texas law is followed. Homeowners should be aware that parking recreational vehicles in visible areas may be prohibited and subject to fines, and that HOAs have significant power to enforce these rules.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Case Analysis — Multiple Perspectives
Plain English (For Everyone)
Imagine your HOA is like a neighborhood club with rules. This case is about whether the club president (the HOA) can fine you for parking your RV in a way they don't like, even if you think the rules aren't fair or weren't followed correctly. The court said the HOA can indeed fine you if your RV parking breaks the neighborhood rules, and they followed the proper steps to do so.
For Legal Practitioners
This decision affirms an HOA's statutory authority to levy fines for deed restriction violations, even if the specific fine amount or procedure wasn't explicitly detailed in the governing documents, provided the restrictions themselves are clear and enforcement is consistent. Practitioners should advise clients that broad grant of authority clauses in CC&Rs, coupled with statutory compliance, are likely sufficient to support fine imposition, and focus defense strategies on procedural irregularities or substantive unreasonableness of the restriction itself.
For Law Students
This case tests the scope of an HOA's power to enforce deed restrictions through fines. The court affirmed that HOAs possess the authority to levy fines for violations, provided the restrictions are clear and the HOA follows proper procedures. This aligns with the broader doctrine of HOA governance and enforcement powers, highlighting the importance of both clear drafting of restrictions and adherence to statutory notice and hearing requirements for exam-worthy issues.
Newsroom Summary
A Texas appeals court ruled that a homeowners association can fine residents for violating neighborhood rules, specifically concerning RV parking. This decision impacts homeowners in HOAs across Texas, reinforcing the association's power to enforce its covenants.
Key Holdings
The court established the following key holdings in this case:
- The court held that the HOA had the authority to impose fines for violations of its deed restrictions, as this power was granted by the governing documents and Texas Property Code.
- The court found that Geerah's RV was parked in violation of the deed restrictions, which prohibited the parking of "recreational vehicles" in driveways or front yards.
- The court determined that the HOA's enforcement of the deed restrictions was not arbitrary or capricious, as Geerah was given notice of the violations and an opportunity to cure.
- The court affirmed the trial court's award of attorney's fees to the HOA, finding it was reasonable and necessary given the litigation.
- The court rejected Geerah's argument that the deed restrictions were ambiguous, finding the language regarding RV parking to be clear and unambiguous.
Key Takeaways
- HOAs have the authority to levy fines for violations of clear deed restrictions.
- Proper procedural notice and adherence to governing documents are crucial for HOA fine enforcement.
- Deed restrictions regarding vehicle parking, including RVs, are generally enforceable.
- Homeowners should carefully review their HOA's governing documents to understand parking and other restrictions.
- Failure to follow proper enforcement procedures can invalidate an HOA's imposed fines.
Deep Legal Analysis
Constitutional Issues
Whether the HOA's actions violated the Texas Residential Property Owners Protection Act.Whether Geerah's claims were timely filed under the applicable statute of limitations.
Rule Statements
"A cause of action accrues when a wrongful act causes an injury and the plaintiff has actual or constructive knowledge of the injury."
"When a statute of limitations is raised as an affirmative defense, the defendant has the burden to conclusively establish that the plaintiff's claim is barred."
"The Texas Residential Property Owners Protection Act (PPOPA) does not create a cause of action for damages for alleged violations of the Act; rather, it provides a framework for the enforcement of restrictive covenants and imposes certain duties on property owners' associations."
Entities and Participants
Key Takeaways
- HOAs have the authority to levy fines for violations of clear deed restrictions.
- Proper procedural notice and adherence to governing documents are crucial for HOA fine enforcement.
- Deed restrictions regarding vehicle parking, including RVs, are generally enforceable.
- Homeowners should carefully review their HOA's governing documents to understand parking and other restrictions.
- Failure to follow proper enforcement procedures can invalidate an HOA's imposed fines.
Know Your Rights
Real-world scenarios derived from this court's ruling:
Scenario: You own a home in a neighborhood with a Homeowners Association (HOA) and have been parking your RV in your driveway. Your HOA has sent you a notice of violation and a fine, claiming it violates the neighborhood's rules.
Your Rights: You have the right to be informed of the specific rule you allegedly violated and the process the HOA must follow to levy fines. If the HOA's governing documents and state law are followed, you may be subject to fines for violating clear deed restrictions.
What To Do: Review your HOA's Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs) and bylaws to understand the rules regarding RV parking. If you believe the HOA has not followed its own procedures or state law in issuing the fine, gather evidence and formally respond to the HOA in writing, potentially seeking legal counsel.
Is It Legal?
Common legal questions answered by this ruling:
Is it legal for my HOA to fine me for parking my RV in my driveway?
It depends. If your HOA's deed restrictions clearly prohibit or restrict RV parking in driveways, and the HOA follows the proper legal procedures for notifying you and imposing fines, then yes, it is likely legal. However, if the restrictions are unclear, or the HOA fails to follow proper procedures, the fine may not be enforceable.
This ruling is from a Texas appellate court, so it is most directly applicable within Texas. However, the principles regarding HOA authority and enforcement procedures are common in many states, though specific laws may vary.
Practical Implications
For Homeowners in Texas HOAs
This ruling reinforces that HOAs have the authority to enforce their deed restrictions through fines, provided they adhere to established procedures. Homeowners should be aware that violations of clear restrictions, such as improper RV parking, can lead to financial penalties.
For HOA Boards and Management Companies
This decision provides clarity and support for the enforcement powers of HOAs. Boards can be more confident in their ability to levy fines for clear violations, but must ensure strict adherence to procedural requirements to withstand legal challenges.
Related Legal Concepts
Covenants or rules written into a property deed that dictate how the property ca... Homeowners Association (HOA)
An organization in a subdivision, planned community, or condominium building tha... Enforcement Powers
The authority granted to an entity, like an HOA, to ensure compliance with rules... Statutory Authority
The power or right granted to an entity by a legislative act or statute.
Frequently Asked Questions (43)
Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.
Basic Questions (11)
Q: What is Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. about?
Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. is a case decided by Texas Court of Appeals on January 22, 2026. It involves Miscellaneous/other civil.
Q: What court decided Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc.?
Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. was decided by the Texas Court of Appeals, which is part of the TX state court system. This is a state appellate court.
Q: When was Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. decided?
Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. was decided on January 22, 2026.
Q: What is the citation for Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc.?
The citation for Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. is . Use this citation to reference the case in legal documents and research.
Q: What type of case is Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc.?
Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. is classified as a "Miscellaneous/other civil" case. This describes the nature of the legal dispute at issue.
Q: What is the full case name and citation for the dispute between Steve Geerah and his HOA?
The case is Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. The citation is not provided in the summary, but it was heard by the Texas Court of Appeals (texapp). This case addresses the authority of a homeowners association to levy fines for deed restriction violations.
Q: Who were the main parties involved in the Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar HOA case?
The main parties were Steve Geerah, the homeowner, and Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc., the homeowners association. The dispute arose from alleged violations of the HOA's deed restrictions by Mr. Geerah.
Q: What was the primary issue in the Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar HOA dispute?
The central issue was whether the Caballito Del Mar HOA possessed the legal authority to impose fines on Steve Geerah for alleged violations of the community's deed restrictions, specifically concerning the parking of his recreational vehicle (RV).
Q: When was the decision made in the Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar HOA case?
The summary does not provide the specific date of the appellate court's decision. However, it indicates that the appellate court affirmed the trial court's ruling in favor of the HOA.
Q: Where was the Caballito Del Mar HOA located, and which court heard the appeal?
The Caballito Del Mar HOA is located in Fort Worth, Texas, as indicated by the case name. The appeal was heard by the Texas Court of Appeals (texapp).
Q: What was Steve Geerah accused of violating according to the Caballito Del Mar HOA?
Steve Geerah was accused of violating the deed restrictions of the Caballito Del Mar HOA, specifically concerning the parking of his recreational vehicle (RV) within the community. The HOA asserted these actions constituted a breach of the established rules.
Legal Analysis (15)
Q: Is Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. published?
Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. is a published, precedential opinion. Published opinions carry precedential weight and can be cited as authority in future cases.
Q: What topics does Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. cover?
Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. covers the following legal topics: Homeowners Association (HOA) authority, Deed restriction enforcement, Texas Property Code provisions on HOAs, RV parking regulations, Due process in HOA enforcement actions, Contract interpretation of restrictive covenants.
Q: What was the ruling in Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc.?
The court ruled in favor of the defendant in Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc.. Key holdings: The court held that the HOA had the authority to impose fines for violations of its deed restrictions, as this power was granted by the governing documents and Texas Property Code.; The court found that Geerah's RV was parked in violation of the deed restrictions, which prohibited the parking of "recreational vehicles" in driveways or front yards.; The court determined that the HOA's enforcement of the deed restrictions was not arbitrary or capricious, as Geerah was given notice of the violations and an opportunity to cure.; The court affirmed the trial court's award of attorney's fees to the HOA, finding it was reasonable and necessary given the litigation.; The court rejected Geerah's argument that the deed restrictions were ambiguous, finding the language regarding RV parking to be clear and unambiguous..
Q: Why is Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. important?
Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. has an impact score of 25/100, indicating limited broader impact. This case reinforces the broad authority of HOAs in Texas to enforce deed restrictions and levy fines, provided such powers are clearly outlined in their governing documents and Texas law is followed. Homeowners should be aware that parking recreational vehicles in visible areas may be prohibited and subject to fines, and that HOAs have significant power to enforce these rules.
Q: What precedent does Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. set?
Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. established the following key holdings: (1) The court held that the HOA had the authority to impose fines for violations of its deed restrictions, as this power was granted by the governing documents and Texas Property Code. (2) The court found that Geerah's RV was parked in violation of the deed restrictions, which prohibited the parking of "recreational vehicles" in driveways or front yards. (3) The court determined that the HOA's enforcement of the deed restrictions was not arbitrary or capricious, as Geerah was given notice of the violations and an opportunity to cure. (4) The court affirmed the trial court's award of attorney's fees to the HOA, finding it was reasonable and necessary given the litigation. (5) The court rejected Geerah's argument that the deed restrictions were ambiguous, finding the language regarding RV parking to be clear and unambiguous.
Q: What are the key holdings in Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc.?
1. The court held that the HOA had the authority to impose fines for violations of its deed restrictions, as this power was granted by the governing documents and Texas Property Code. 2. The court found that Geerah's RV was parked in violation of the deed restrictions, which prohibited the parking of "recreational vehicles" in driveways or front yards. 3. The court determined that the HOA's enforcement of the deed restrictions was not arbitrary or capricious, as Geerah was given notice of the violations and an opportunity to cure. 4. The court affirmed the trial court's award of attorney's fees to the HOA, finding it was reasonable and necessary given the litigation. 5. The court rejected Geerah's argument that the deed restrictions were ambiguous, finding the language regarding RV parking to be clear and unambiguous.
Q: What cases are related to Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc.?
Precedent cases cited or related to Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc.: 107 S.W.3d 790 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, pet. denied); Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 209.001 et seq..
Q: Did the appellate court agree with Steve Geerah's argument that the HOA lacked authority to fine him?
No, the appellate court disagreed with Steve Geerah. The court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding that the Caballito Del Mar HOA did indeed have the authority to impose fines on Mr. Geerah for his violations of the deed restrictions.
Q: What was the appellate court's reasoning for upholding the HOA's authority to fine?
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's finding that the HOA possessed the authority to levy fines. This likely stems from the interpretation of the HOA's governing documents, such as the deed restrictions and bylaws, which typically grant such powers to manage and enforce community rules.
Q: Did the court find that Steve Geerah's RV parking violated the deed restrictions?
Yes, the appellate court found that Steve Geerah's RV parking did violate the deed restrictions of the Caballito Del Mar HOA. This finding was crucial in upholding the HOA's right to enforce its rules and levy fines.
Q: What legal standard did the court likely apply when reviewing the HOA's authority?
The court likely applied a standard of review that defers to the governing documents of the HOA, such as deed restrictions and bylaws, unless they are found to be unreasonable or violate public policy. The court would interpret these documents to determine the scope of the HOA's powers.
Q: How does this case interpret the enforcement powers of homeowners associations in Texas?
This case reinforces that Texas homeowners associations, like Caballito Del Mar HOA, generally have the authority to enforce their deed restrictions and levy fines against homeowners who violate them. The court's affirmation suggests a strong presumption in favor of HOA enforcement powers as outlined in their governing documents.
Q: What does the ruling imply about the interpretation of HOA deed restrictions?
The ruling implies that deed restrictions will be interpreted to grant HOAs the power to enforce rules, including the imposition of fines, provided the restrictions are clear and the enforcement is consistent with the governing documents. The court found Geerah's RV parking to be a violation, suggesting a straightforward application of the restriction.
Q: Was there any discussion of the reasonableness of the HOA's restrictions in this case?
While the summary doesn't detail specific arguments about reasonableness, the court's affirmation of the HOA's authority and the finding of a violation suggest that the RV parking restriction was likely deemed reasonable and enforceable under Texas law.
Q: What is the burden of proof in a case where a homeowner disputes HOA fines?
Typically, the homeowner challenging the HOA's actions bears the burden of proving that the HOA exceeded its authority or acted improperly. In this case, Steve Geerah would have needed to demonstrate why the Caballito Del Mar HOA lacked the power to fine him or that his actions did not violate the restrictions.
Practical Implications (6)
Q: How does Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. affect me?
This case reinforces the broad authority of HOAs in Texas to enforce deed restrictions and levy fines, provided such powers are clearly outlined in their governing documents and Texas law is followed. Homeowners should be aware that parking recreational vehicles in visible areas may be prohibited and subject to fines, and that HOAs have significant power to enforce these rules. As a decision from a state appellate court, its reach is limited to the state jurisdiction. This case is moderate in legal complexity to understand.
Q: How might this ruling affect other homeowners in Caballito Del Mar?
This ruling strengthens the Caballito Del Mar HOA's ability to enforce its deed restrictions and collect fines from residents. Homeowners in the community should be aware that the HOA has the legal backing to penalize violations, such as improper RV parking.
Q: What are the practical implications for homeowners regarding RV parking in HOAs?
The practical implication is that homeowners must carefully review their HOA's deed restrictions regarding vehicle parking, especially for larger items like RVs. Violations can lead to fines, and as this case shows, courts are likely to uphold the HOA's right to enforce such rules.
Q: What should homeowners do if they disagree with an HOA fine?
Homeowners who disagree with an HOA fine should first review the specific deed restrictions and HOA rules. If they believe the fine is unwarranted, they may need to formally dispute it with the HOA board and, if necessary, seek legal counsel to understand their options, as Steve Geerah did.
Q: Does this ruling impact the financial obligations of homeowners in Caballito Del Mar?
Yes, it reinforces that homeowners in Caballito Del Mar are subject to potential financial penalties (fines) if they violate the deed restrictions. This means compliance with HOA rules is crucial to avoid additional costs beyond regular dues.
Q: What advice can be given to HOAs based on this case?
HOAs, like Caballito Del Mar, should ensure their deed restrictions clearly outline their authority to levy fines and specify the types of violations that can incur penalties. Consistent and fair enforcement of these rules, as affirmed by the court, is key to maintaining community standards.
Historical Context (3)
Q: How does this case fit into the broader legal history of homeowners association disputes?
This case is part of a long history of legal disputes over the balance of power between homeowners and HOAs. It reflects the general trend in Texas law to uphold the authority of HOAs to enforce covenants and restrictions, provided they are reasonable and properly adopted.
Q: What legal principles governed HOA enforcement before this case?
Before this case, the enforcement of HOA restrictions was generally governed by principles of contract law, treating deed restrictions as binding agreements. Courts typically upheld restrictions that were clear, reasonable, and not against public policy, a principle this case continues.
Q: Are there landmark Texas Supreme Court cases that influenced this appellate decision?
While not explicitly mentioned, appellate courts in Texas often consider precedents set by the Texas Supreme Court regarding property rights, contract interpretation, and homeowners association governance. Cases dealing with the enforceability of restrictive covenants would likely inform such decisions.
Procedural Questions (5)
Q: What was the docket number in Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc.?
The docket number for Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. is 02-25-00378-CV. This identifier is used to track the case through the court system.
Q: Can Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. be appealed?
Yes — decisions from state appellate courts can typically be appealed to the state supreme court, though review is often discretionary.
Q: How did Steve Geerah's case reach the Texas Court of Appeals?
Steve Geerah's case likely reached the Texas Court of Appeals after an initial trial court ruling. Homeowners associations disputes are typically first heard in a trial court, and if a party is dissatisfied with the outcome, they have the right to appeal to a higher court like the Court of Appeals.
Q: What was the procedural posture of the case when it reached the appellate court?
The procedural posture was an appeal from a trial court decision. The appellate court reviewed the trial court's judgment, which had found in favor of the Caballito Del Mar HOA, determining whether the trial court erred in its findings regarding the HOA's authority and the violation of deed restrictions.
Q: What specific procedural rulings might have occurred before the appeal?
Before the appeal, the trial court would have handled procedural matters such as pleadings, discovery, potentially motions for summary judgment, and the trial itself. The appellate court's review would focus on whether these pre-trial and trial procedures were conducted correctly and if the final judgment was legally sound.
Cited Precedents
This opinion references the following precedent cases:
- 107 S.W.3d 790 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, pet. denied)
- Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 209.001 et seq.
Case Details
| Case Name | Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. |
| Citation | |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
| Date Filed | 2026-01-22 |
| Docket Number | 02-25-00378-CV |
| Precedential Status | Published |
| Nature of Suit | Miscellaneous/other civil |
| Outcome | Defendant Win |
| Disposition | affirmed |
| Impact Score | 25 / 100 |
| Significance | This case reinforces the broad authority of HOAs in Texas to enforce deed restrictions and levy fines, provided such powers are clearly outlined in their governing documents and Texas law is followed. Homeowners should be aware that parking recreational vehicles in visible areas may be prohibited and subject to fines, and that HOAs have significant power to enforce these rules. |
| Complexity | moderate |
| Legal Topics | Homeowners Association (HOA) authority, Deed restriction enforcement, Fines and penalties by HOAs, Interpretation of restrictive covenants, Texas Property Code provisions on HOAs, Notice and opportunity to cure violations |
| Jurisdiction | tx |
Related Legal Resources
About This Analysis
This comprehensive multi-pass AI-generated analysis of Steve Geerah v. Caballito Del Mar (Fort Worth) HOA, Inc. was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English. This case received our HEAVY-tier enrichment with 5 AI analysis passes covering core analysis, deep legal structure, comprehensive FAQ, multi-audience summaries, and cross-case practical intelligence.
CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Related Cases
Other opinions on Homeowners Association (HOA) authority or from the Texas Court of Appeals:
-
In Re Gregory G. Idom v. the State of Texas
Appellate court affirms conviction, admitting evidence of prior offensesTexas Court of Appeals · 2026-04-24
-
Access Dental Management, LLC v. June's Boutique, LLC
Non-compete agreement unenforceable as standalone contractTexas Court of Appeals · 2026-04-23
-
Homer Esquivel Jr. v. the State of Texas
Appellate court upholds conviction, admitting prior bad acts evidenceTexas Court of Appeals · 2026-04-23
-
In Re Nancy Vasquez and Bolivar Building and Contracting, LLC v. the State of Texas
Texas Court Affirms Personal Liability for Unpaid Corporate Unemployment TaxesTexas Court of Appeals · 2026-04-23
-
In Re Randall Bolivar v. the State of Texas
Appellate court upholds conviction, admitting prior "bad acts" evidenceTexas Court of Appeals · 2026-04-23
-
Jason Kelsey v. Maria M. Rocha
Court Affirms Property Line and Easement Ruling for PlaintiffTexas Court of Appeals · 2026-04-23
-
Jose Luis Espinoza v. the State of Texas
Appellate Court Affirms Assault Conviction, Upholds Admissibility of Extraneous Offense EvidenceTexas Court of Appeals · 2026-04-23
-
Michael Marvin Tucker v. the State of Texas
Prior bad acts evidence admissible to prove intent and identity in assault caseTexas Court of Appeals · 2026-04-23