Linardon v. Staybridge Suites

Headline: Staybridge Suites Ordered to Pay Former Employee Unpaid Wages and Damages for Wage Act Violations

Court: mass · Filed: 2026-03-02 · Docket: SJC 13849
Outcome: Plaintiff Win
Impact Score: 75/100 — High impact: This case is likely to influence future legal proceedings significantly.
Legal Topics: wage-and-houremployment-lawovertime-paypay-stubsliquidated-damages

Case Summary

This case involves a dispute between a former employee, Linardon, and Staybridge Suites. Linardon sued Staybridge Suites, alleging that the company failed to pay him for all hours worked, including overtime, and also failed to provide him with proper pay stubs, in violation of Massachusetts wage laws. The court found in favor of Linardon, ruling that Staybridge Suites did indeed violate the Massachusetts Wage Act by not paying him for all hours worked and by not providing accurate pay stubs. The court awarded Linardon unpaid wages, liquidated damages (which double the unpaid wages as a penalty), and his attorney's fees and costs. The core of the ruling centered on the employer's obligation to accurately track and pay for all hours worked, even if those hours were not explicitly approved beforehand, as long as the employer knew or should have known the employee was working. The court also emphasized the importance of providing detailed and accurate pay stubs as required by law. This decision reinforces the strict requirements of the Massachusetts Wage Act and its protections for employees.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Key Holdings

The court established the following key holdings in this case:

  1. An employer violates the Massachusetts Wage Act by failing to pay an employee for all hours worked, including overtime, even if those hours were not pre-approved, so long as the employer knew or should have known the employee was working.
  2. An employer violates the Massachusetts Wage Act by failing to provide employees with accurate and detailed pay stubs that include all required information, such as the total hours worked.
  3. Employees who successfully prove Wage Act violations are entitled to unpaid wages, liquidated damages (double the unpaid wages), and reasonable attorney's fees and costs.

Entities and Participants

Parties

  • Linardon (party)
  • Staybridge Suites (company)
  • mass (party)

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.

Basic Questions (4)

Q: What was this case about?

This case was about a former employee, Linardon, suing Staybridge Suites for alleged violations of the Massachusetts Wage Act, specifically regarding unpaid wages, overtime, and improper pay stubs.

Q: What did Linardon claim Staybridge Suites did wrong?

Linardon claimed Staybridge Suites failed to pay him for all hours worked, including overtime, and did not provide him with proper, detailed pay stubs as required by Massachusetts law.

Q: What was the court's decision?

The court ruled in favor of Linardon, finding that Staybridge Suites violated the Massachusetts Wage Act. The court ordered Staybridge Suites to pay Linardon unpaid wages, liquidated damages, and his attorney's fees and costs.

Q: What is the significance of this ruling for employers?

This ruling emphasizes that employers in Massachusetts must accurately track and pay for all hours an employee works, even if not pre-approved, if the employer knew or should have known about the work. It also highlights the strict requirement to provide accurate and detailed pay stubs.

Case Details

Case NameLinardon v. Staybridge Suites
Courtmass
Date Filed2026-03-02
Docket NumberSJC 13849
OutcomePlaintiff Win
Impact Score75 / 100
Legal Topicswage-and-hour, employment-law, overtime-pay, pay-stubs, liquidated-damages
Jurisdictionma

About This Analysis

This AI-generated analysis of Linardon v. Staybridge Suites was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English.

CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.