In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.710
Headline: Florida Supreme Court Amends Rules for Appealing Lawyer Advertising Decisions
Citation:
Case Summary
This case involves amendments to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.710, which governs the procedures for appealing decisions made by the Florida Bar's Board of Governors concerning lawyer advertising. The Florida Supreme Court approved several changes to the rule. Key amendments include clarifying that the Board of Governors' decision is final agency action, establishing a 30-day deadline for filing a notice of appeal, and specifying the required contents of the notice of appeal. The amendments also detail the process for filing the record on appeal, the briefing schedule, and the standard of review the Court will apply, which is whether the Board's findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence and whether its recommendations are lawful. The Court also clarified that the Board's decision is presumed correct.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Key Holdings
The court established the following key holdings in this case:
- Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.710 is amended to clarify the process for appealing Florida Bar Board of Governors' decisions on lawyer advertising.
- The Board of Governors' decision regarding lawyer advertising is deemed a final agency action.
- A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the Board's decision.
- The standard of review for the Supreme Court is whether the Board's findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence and whether its recommendations are lawful.
- The Board's decision is presumed correct on appeal.
Entities and Participants
Parties
- Florida Supreme Court (party)
- Florida Bar (company)
- Board of Governors (company)
Frequently Asked Questions (4)
Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.
Basic Questions (4)
Q: What was this case about?
This case was about the Florida Supreme Court's amendments to Rule 9.710 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, which outlines the process for appealing decisions made by the Florida Bar's Board of Governors regarding lawyer advertising.
Q: What is the main purpose of the amendments?
The main purpose of the amendments is to clarify and streamline the appellate process for challenging decisions on lawyer advertising made by the Florida Bar's Board of Governors, including setting deadlines, specifying required documents, and defining the standard of review.
Q: What is the deadline for filing an appeal under the new rule?
Under the amended rule, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the Board of Governors' decision.
Q: What standard will the Supreme Court use to review these appeals?
The Supreme Court will review whether the Board's findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence and whether its recommendations are lawful. The Board's decision is also presumed correct.
Case Details
| Case Name | In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.710 |
| Citation | |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
| Date Filed | 2026-03-12 |
| Docket Number | SC2025-1415 |
| Precedential Status | Published |
| Outcome | Other |
| Impact Score | 60 / 100 |
| Legal Topics | appellate-procedure, legal-ethics, administrative-law, rule-amendment |
| Jurisdiction | fl |
Related Legal Resources
About This Analysis
This AI-generated analysis of In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.710 was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English.
CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Related Cases
Other opinions on appellate-procedure or from the Florida Supreme Court:
-
In Re Bruce Wheatley in His Capacity as of the Estate of Judith T. Wheatley, and Tony Aguilar v. the State of Texas
Texas Appeals Court Affirms Estate Distribution and State's RoleTexas Court of Appeals · 2026-04-22
-
Bobo v. Appellate Division of Super. Ct.
Supreme Court Denies Mandate for Suppression Motion ReviewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026-04-22
-
Ex Parte Terran Doral Green v. the State of Texas
Appellate Court Denies Mandamus for Untimely New Trial RulingTexas Court of Appeals · 2026-04-14
-
In re: Nom. of Morris; Appeal of: Morris
Father cannot appeal custody order he agreed toPennsylvania Supreme Court · 2026-04-12
-
Michael Dewayne Norris v. the State of Texas
Conviction for Aggravated Sexual Assault AffirmedTexas Court of Appeals · 2026-04-02
-
Walker v. State of Florida
Ineffective Assistance Claim Fails Due to Lack of PrejudiceFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-02
-
Thaddeus Deshun Papillion v. the State of Texas
Appellate Court Upholds Conviction, Denies Mistrial RequestTexas Court of Appeals · 2026-04-01
-
Lance Davis v. the State of Texas
Conviction for Aggravated Sexual Assault AffirmedTexas Court of Appeals · 2026-04-01