Seal Team 6 Asphalt Ceiling Co., L.L.C. v. Ford

Headline: Appellate court reverses judgment for asphalt company, remands case over contract dispute

Citation: 2026 Ohio 1116

Court: Ohio Court of Appeals · Filed: 2026-03-30 · Docket: 2025-T-0056
Published
Outcome: Remanded
Impact Score: 45/100 — Low-moderate impact: This case addresses specific legal issues with limited broader application.
Legal Topics: contract lawbreach of contractconditions precedentappellate procedure

Case Summary

This case involves a dispute between Seal Team 6 Asphalt Ceiling Co., L.L.C. (Seal Team 6) and Ford over a contract for asphalt work. Seal Team 6 sued Ford, alleging that Ford breached the contract by failing to pay for the work performed. Ford, in turn, argued that the work was not completed according to the contract specifications and that Seal Team 6 had not met certain conditions precedent to payment. The trial court initially ruled in favor of Seal Team 6, awarding them damages. However, the appellate court reviewed the case and found that the trial court had made errors in its application of the law, particularly concerning the conditions precedent and the evidence presented regarding the quality of the work. As a result, the appellate court reversed the trial court's decision and remanded the case back for further proceedings.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Court Syllabus

CIVIL - Forcible Entry and Detainer; R.C. Ch. 4781; R.C. Ch. 1923; Manufactured home park operator; R.C. 4781.37; R.C. 4781.45; R.C. 4781.39; owner of manufactured home park was without statutory authority to prevail in forcible entry and detainer where the owner failed to allege tenant had committed any violation of the tenancy.

Key Holdings

The court established the following key holdings in this case:

  1. A trial court's judgment may be reversed if it fails to properly consider conditions precedent to payment outlined in a contract.
  2. The appellate court must review the evidence presented to determine if a party has met its contractual obligations before awarding damages.

Entities and Participants

Parties

  • Seal Team 6 Asphalt Ceiling Co., L.L.C. (company)
  • Ford (company)

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.

Basic Questions (4)

Q: What was the main issue in this case?

The main issue was whether Seal Team 6 Asphalt Ceiling Co. had fulfilled its contractual obligations to Ford, particularly concerning the quality of asphalt work and meeting conditions precedent to payment, and whether the trial court had correctly applied the law in awarding damages to Seal Team 6.

Q: What did the appellate court decide?

The appellate court reversed the trial court's decision in favor of Seal Team 6 and remanded the case back for further proceedings, finding that the trial court had erred in its legal analysis.

Q: Why did the appellate court reverse the trial court's decision?

The appellate court found that the trial court did not properly consider the conditions precedent to payment in the contract and made errors in evaluating the evidence regarding the quality of the asphalt work.

Q: What happens next in this case?

The case will be sent back to the trial court for further proceedings, where the issues will be re-examined in light of the appellate court's ruling.

Case Details

Case NameSeal Team 6 Asphalt Ceiling Co., L.L.C. v. Ford
Citation2026 Ohio 1116
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
Date Filed2026-03-30
Docket Number2025-T-0056
Precedential StatusPublished
OutcomeRemanded
Impact Score45 / 100
Legal Topicscontract law, breach of contract, conditions precedent, appellate procedure
Jurisdictionoh

Related Legal Resources

Ohio Court of Appeals Opinions contract lawbreach of contractconditions precedentappellate procedure oh Jurisdiction Home Search Cases Is It Legal? 2026 Cases All Courts All Topics States Rankings contract law Guidebreach of contract Guide contract law Topic Hubbreach of contract Topic Hubconditions precedent Topic Hub

About This Analysis

This AI-generated analysis of Seal Team 6 Asphalt Ceiling Co., L.L.C. v. Ford was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English.

CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Related Cases

Other opinions on contract law or from the Ohio Court of Appeals:

  • State v. Goodson
    Probable Cause Justifies Warrantless Vehicle Search for Drugs
    Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-04-24
  • State v. Sanchez
    Statements to Police Deemed Voluntary, Conviction Affirmed
    Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-04-24
  • State v. Castaneda
    Ohio Court Affirms Suppression of Evidence from Warrantless Vehicle Search
    Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-04-24
  • State v. Mitchell
    Court suppresses evidence from warrantless vehicle search due to lack of probable cause
    Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-04-24
  • State v. Thompson
    Ohio Court Affirms Warrantless Vehicle Search Based on Probable Cause
    Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-04-24
  • State v. Gore
    Warrantless vehicle search after traffic stop deemed unlawful
    Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-04-24
  • Helton v. Kettering Medical Ctr.
    Medical Malpractice Claim Fails Due to Insufficient Evidence of Negligence
    Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-04-24
  • In re C.P.
    Ohio Court Allows Reconsideration of No-Contact Order for Child Visitation
    Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-04-24