Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida
Headline: Consent to Search Valid Despite Officer's Questioning
Citation:
Case Summary
Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida, decided by Florida District Court of Appeal on April 2, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of the defendant's motion to suppress evidence, finding that the defendant's consent to search his vehicle was voluntary and not coerced. The court also held that the officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop. The court held: The trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress evidence.. The defendant's consent to search his vehicle was voluntary and not the product of coercion.. The officer had reasonable suspicion to initiate the traffic stop based on observed driving behavior.. This case reinforces the standard for voluntary consent to search and the requirements for reasonable suspicion in traffic stops, providing guidance for law enforcement and defense attorneys in Florida.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Key Holdings
The court established the following key holdings in this case:
- The trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress evidence.
- The defendant's consent to search his vehicle was voluntary and not the product of coercion.
- The officer had reasonable suspicion to initiate the traffic stop based on observed driving behavior.
Entities and Participants
Frequently Asked Questions (16)
Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.
Basic Questions (16)
Q: What is Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida about?
Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida is a case decided by Florida District Court of Appeal on April 2, 2026.
Q: What court decided Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida?
Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida was decided by the Florida District Court of Appeal, which is part of the FL state court system. This is a state appellate court.
Q: When was Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida decided?
Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida was decided on April 2, 2026.
Q: What was the docket number in Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida?
The docket number for Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida is 5D2025-1616. This identifier is used to track the case through the court system.
Q: What is the citation for Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida?
The citation for Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida is . Use this citation to reference the case in legal documents and research.
Q: Is Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida published?
Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida is a published, precedential opinion. Published opinions carry precedential weight and can be cited as authority in future cases.
Q: What was the ruling in Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida?
The court ruled in favor of the defendant in Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida. Key holdings: The trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress evidence.; The defendant's consent to search his vehicle was voluntary and not the product of coercion.; The officer had reasonable suspicion to initiate the traffic stop based on observed driving behavior..
Q: Why is Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida important?
Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida has an impact score of 45/100, indicating moderate legal relevance. This case reinforces the standard for voluntary consent to search and the requirements for reasonable suspicion in traffic stops, providing guidance for law enforcement and defense attorneys in Florida.
Q: What precedent does Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida set?
Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida established the following key holdings: (1) The trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress evidence. (2) The defendant's consent to search his vehicle was voluntary and not the product of coercion. (3) The officer had reasonable suspicion to initiate the traffic stop based on observed driving behavior.
Q: What are the key holdings in Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida?
1. The trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress evidence. 2. The defendant's consent to search his vehicle was voluntary and not the product of coercion. 3. The officer had reasonable suspicion to initiate the traffic stop based on observed driving behavior.
Q: How does Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida affect me?
This case reinforces the standard for voluntary consent to search and the requirements for reasonable suspicion in traffic stops, providing guidance for law enforcement and defense attorneys in Florida. As a decision from a state appellate court, its reach is limited to the state jurisdiction. This case is moderate in legal complexity to understand.
Q: Can Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida be appealed?
Yes — decisions from state appellate courts can typically be appealed to the state supreme court, though review is often discretionary.
Q: What cases are related to Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida?
Precedent cases cited or related to Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida: State v. J.A.; State v. Smith.
Q: What specific factors did the court consider when determining the voluntariness of the consent to search?
The court considered factors such as the officer's tone of voice, the duration of the stop, the presence of physical restraints, and the defendant's age, intelligence, and education.
Q: What constitutes 'reasonable suspicion' for a traffic stop in Florida?
Reasonable suspicion exists when an officer has a specific and articulable fact that, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrants the intrusion.
Q: How does the appellate court's review of a motion to suppress differ from the trial court's initial decision?
The appellate court reviews the trial court's factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo.
Cited Precedents
This opinion references the following precedent cases:
- State v. J.A.
- State v. Smith
Case Details
| Case Name | Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida |
| Citation | |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeal |
| Date Filed | 2026-04-02 |
| Docket Number | 5D2025-1616 |
| Precedential Status | Published |
| Outcome | Defendant Win |
| Impact Score | 45 / 100 |
| Significance | This case reinforces the standard for voluntary consent to search and the requirements for reasonable suspicion in traffic stops, providing guidance for law enforcement and defense attorneys in Florida. |
| Complexity | moderate |
| Legal Topics | Fourth Amendment, Consent to Search, Reasonable Suspicion, Traffic Stops |
| Jurisdiction | fl |
Related Legal Resources
About This Analysis
This AI-generated analysis of Cameo Capell Reid v. State of Florida was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English.
CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Related Cases
Other opinions on Fourth Amendment or from the Florida District Court of Appeal:
-
Mikesha Chantae Johnson v. Department of Revenue and Jevaun Shimoi Harvey
Homestead Exemption Allowed for Co-Owned Property Despite Co-Owner's IntentFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Paris Demetrius Evans v. State of Florida, Orange County Sheriff's Office, and Clerk of the Court for Orange County
Appellate court affirms denial of motion to correct illegal sentence without hearingFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Raul A. Campoverde v. State of Florida
Anonymous tip insufficient for traffic stop, evidence suppressedFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Carliovis Bandera-Valier v. State of Florida
Prior Bad Acts Evidence Admissible Under Modus Operandi ExceptionFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Damerius Kashon Hart v. State of Florida
Traffic stop lacked reasonable suspicion, evidence suppressedFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
JERRETT WILLIAMS GRAHAM, Individually and as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF RAJAH MALIK GRAHAM v. ORLANDO LODGE NO. 1079, BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. D/B/A ORLANDO FLORIDA ELKS LODGE 1079, and TAJH WILLIAMS, Individually
Elks Lodge owes duty of care in overdose death caseFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Patrick Maxwell v. State of Florida
Florida appeals court: Nervousness and marijuana smell insufficient for probable causeFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Quintavis Jaquan Wilson v. State of Florida
Affirmed: Reasonable suspicion justified traffic stop, leading to drug conviction.Florida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24