Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc.
Headline: Breach of Contract Claim Barred by Statute of Limitations
Citation:
Case Summary
Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc., decided by Florida District Court of Appeal on April 2, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding that the plaintiff's claim for breach of contract was barred by the statute of limitations. The court held that the plaintiff's allegations did not establish a continuing breach that would toll the statute. The court held: A breach of contract claim is barred by the statute of limitations if it is not filed within the prescribed time period.. The statute of limitations is not tolled by allegations of a continuing breach unless the plaintiff can demonstrate a continuous, ongoing violation of the contract.. Mere repeated breaches do not constitute a continuing breach for the purpose of tolling the statute of limitations.. This case reinforces the importance of timely filing lawsuits and clarifies the distinction between repeated and continuing breaches for the purpose of tolling the statute of limitations in contract disputes.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Key Holdings
The court established the following key holdings in this case:
- A breach of contract claim is barred by the statute of limitations if it is not filed within the prescribed time period.
- The statute of limitations is not tolled by allegations of a continuing breach unless the plaintiff can demonstrate a continuous, ongoing violation of the contract.
- Mere repeated breaches do not constitute a continuing breach for the purpose of tolling the statute of limitations.
Entities and Participants
Frequently Asked Questions (15)
Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.
Basic Questions (15)
Q: What is Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. about?
Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. is a case decided by Florida District Court of Appeal on April 2, 2026.
Q: What court decided Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc.?
Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. was decided by the Florida District Court of Appeal, which is part of the FL state court system. This is a state appellate court.
Q: When was Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. decided?
Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. was decided on April 2, 2026.
Q: What was the docket number in Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc.?
The docket number for Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. is 4D2025-1209. This identifier is used to track the case through the court system.
Q: What is the citation for Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc.?
The citation for Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. is . Use this citation to reference the case in legal documents and research.
Q: Is Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. published?
Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. is a published, precedential opinion. Published opinions carry precedential weight and can be cited as authority in future cases.
Q: What was the ruling in Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc.?
The court ruled in favor of the defendant in Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc.. Key holdings: A breach of contract claim is barred by the statute of limitations if it is not filed within the prescribed time period.; The statute of limitations is not tolled by allegations of a continuing breach unless the plaintiff can demonstrate a continuous, ongoing violation of the contract.; Mere repeated breaches do not constitute a continuing breach for the purpose of tolling the statute of limitations..
Q: Why is Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. important?
Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. has an impact score of 45/100, indicating moderate legal relevance. This case reinforces the importance of timely filing lawsuits and clarifies the distinction between repeated and continuing breaches for the purpose of tolling the statute of limitations in contract disputes.
Q: What precedent does Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. set?
Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. established the following key holdings: (1) A breach of contract claim is barred by the statute of limitations if it is not filed within the prescribed time period. (2) The statute of limitations is not tolled by allegations of a continuing breach unless the plaintiff can demonstrate a continuous, ongoing violation of the contract. (3) Mere repeated breaches do not constitute a continuing breach for the purpose of tolling the statute of limitations.
Q: What are the key holdings in Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc.?
1. A breach of contract claim is barred by the statute of limitations if it is not filed within the prescribed time period. 2. The statute of limitations is not tolled by allegations of a continuing breach unless the plaintiff can demonstrate a continuous, ongoing violation of the contract. 3. Mere repeated breaches do not constitute a continuing breach for the purpose of tolling the statute of limitations.
Q: How does Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. affect me?
This case reinforces the importance of timely filing lawsuits and clarifies the distinction between repeated and continuing breaches for the purpose of tolling the statute of limitations in contract disputes. As a decision from a state appellate court, its reach is limited to the state jurisdiction. This case is moderate in legal complexity to understand.
Q: Can Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. be appealed?
Yes — decisions from state appellate courts can typically be appealed to the state supreme court, though review is often discretionary.
Q: What is the typical statute of limitations for a breach of contract claim in Florida?
In Florida, the statute of limitations for a breach of contract claim is generally five years from the date the cause of action accrues.
Q: Under what circumstances might a statute of limitations be tolled in a contract dispute?
A statute of limitations can be tolled under various circumstances, such as fraudulent concealment by the defendant, minority or incapacity of the plaintiff, or, as attempted here, a claim of continuing breach.
Q: What is the difference between a 'repeated breach' and a 'continuing breach' in contract law?
A repeated breach involves multiple distinct violations of the contract, each giving rise to a separate cause of action. A continuing breach, on the other hand, is a single, ongoing violation that persists over time, where the cause of action accrues anew each day the breach continues.
Case Details
| Case Name | Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. |
| Citation | |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeal |
| Date Filed | 2026-04-02 |
| Docket Number | 4D2025-1209 |
| Precedential Status | Published |
| Outcome | Defendant Win |
| Impact Score | 45 / 100 |
| Significance | This case reinforces the importance of timely filing lawsuits and clarifies the distinction between repeated and continuing breaches for the purpose of tolling the statute of limitations in contract disputes. |
| Complexity | moderate |
| Legal Topics | breach of contract, statute of limitations, tolling |
| Jurisdiction | fl |
Related Legal Resources
About This Analysis
This AI-generated analysis of Johanna Gromek v. Six Oaks Groves, Inc. was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English.
CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Related Cases
Other opinions on breach of contract or from the Florida District Court of Appeal:
-
Mikesha Chantae Johnson v. Department of Revenue and Jevaun Shimoi Harvey
Homestead Exemption Allowed for Co-Owned Property Despite Co-Owner's IntentFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Paris Demetrius Evans v. State of Florida, Orange County Sheriff's Office, and Clerk of the Court for Orange County
Appellate court affirms denial of motion to correct illegal sentence without hearingFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Raul A. Campoverde v. State of Florida
Anonymous tip insufficient for traffic stop, evidence suppressedFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Carliovis Bandera-Valier v. State of Florida
Prior Bad Acts Evidence Admissible Under Modus Operandi ExceptionFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Damerius Kashon Hart v. State of Florida
Traffic stop lacked reasonable suspicion, evidence suppressedFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
JERRETT WILLIAMS GRAHAM, Individually and as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF RAJAH MALIK GRAHAM v. ORLANDO LODGE NO. 1079, BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. D/B/A ORLANDO FLORIDA ELKS LODGE 1079, and TAJH WILLIAMS, Individually
Elks Lodge owes duty of care in overdose death caseFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Patrick Maxwell v. State of Florida
Florida appeals court: Nervousness and marijuana smell insufficient for probable causeFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Quintavis Jaquan Wilson v. State of Florida
Affirmed: Reasonable suspicion justified traffic stop, leading to drug conviction.Florida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24