Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos
Headline: Appellate Court Upholds Equitable Distribution and Alimony Award
Citation:
Case Summary
Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos, decided by Florida District Court of Appeal on April 2, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision regarding the equitable distribution of assets and alimony, finding no abuse of discretion. The court also affirmed the denial of the husband's motion for a new trial. The court held: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in the equitable distribution of marital assets.. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding alimony.. The denial of the husband's motion for a new trial was proper.. This case reinforces the deference appellate courts give to trial court decisions in family law matters, particularly concerning equitable distribution and alimony, unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Key Holdings
The court established the following key holdings in this case:
- The trial court did not abuse its discretion in the equitable distribution of marital assets.
- The trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding alimony.
- The denial of the husband's motion for a new trial was proper.
Entities and Participants
Frequently Asked Questions (15)
Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.
Basic Questions (15)
Q: What is Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos about?
Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos is a case decided by Florida District Court of Appeal on April 2, 2026.
Q: What court decided Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos?
Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos was decided by the Florida District Court of Appeal, which is part of the FL state court system. This is a state appellate court.
Q: When was Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos decided?
Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos was decided on April 2, 2026.
Q: What was the docket number in Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos?
The docket number for Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos is 4D2025-2710. This identifier is used to track the case through the court system.
Q: What is the citation for Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos?
The citation for Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos is . Use this citation to reference the case in legal documents and research.
Q: Is Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos published?
Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos is a published, precedential opinion. Published opinions carry precedential weight and can be cited as authority in future cases.
Q: What was the ruling in Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos?
The court ruled in favor of the defendant in Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos. Key holdings: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in the equitable distribution of marital assets.; The trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding alimony.; The denial of the husband's motion for a new trial was proper..
Q: Why is Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos important?
Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos has an impact score of 25/100, indicating limited broader impact. This case reinforces the deference appellate courts give to trial court decisions in family law matters, particularly concerning equitable distribution and alimony, unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated.
Q: What precedent does Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos set?
Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos established the following key holdings: (1) The trial court did not abuse its discretion in the equitable distribution of marital assets. (2) The trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding alimony. (3) The denial of the husband's motion for a new trial was proper.
Q: What are the key holdings in Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos?
1. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in the equitable distribution of marital assets. 2. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding alimony. 3. The denial of the husband's motion for a new trial was proper.
Q: How does Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos affect me?
This case reinforces the deference appellate courts give to trial court decisions in family law matters, particularly concerning equitable distribution and alimony, unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated. As a decision from a state appellate court, its reach is limited to the state jurisdiction. This case is accessible to a general audience to understand.
Q: Can Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos be appealed?
Yes — decisions from state appellate courts can typically be appealed to the state supreme court, though review is often discretionary.
Q: What specific factors does Florida law consider when determining equitable distribution of marital assets?
Florida Statute 61.075 outlines factors such as the contribution of each spouse to the marriage, the economic circumstances of each spouse, and the duration of the marriage.
Q: Under what circumstances can a party appeal an alimony award in Florida?
An alimony award can be appealed if the trial court abused its discretion, meaning the decision was unreasonable, arbitrary, or unsupported by the evidence.
Q: What is the standard of review for a trial court's denial of a motion for a new trial?
The appellate court reviews the denial of a motion for a new trial for an abuse of discretion.
Case Details
| Case Name | Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos |
| Citation | |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeal |
| Date Filed | 2026-04-02 |
| Docket Number | 4D2025-2710 |
| Precedential Status | Published |
| Outcome | Defendant Win |
| Impact Score | 25 / 100 |
| Significance | This case reinforces the deference appellate courts give to trial court decisions in family law matters, particularly concerning equitable distribution and alimony, unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated. |
| Complexity | easy |
| Legal Topics | equitable distribution, alimony, new trial |
| Jurisdiction | fl |
Related Legal Resources
About This Analysis
This AI-generated analysis of Shannon Katsenos v. George Katsenos was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English.
CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Related Cases
Other opinions on equitable distribution or from the Florida District Court of Appeal:
-
Mikesha Chantae Johnson v. Department of Revenue and Jevaun Shimoi Harvey
Homestead Exemption Allowed for Co-Owned Property Despite Co-Owner's IntentFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Paris Demetrius Evans v. State of Florida, Orange County Sheriff's Office, and Clerk of the Court for Orange County
Appellate court affirms denial of motion to correct illegal sentence without hearingFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Raul A. Campoverde v. State of Florida
Anonymous tip insufficient for traffic stop, evidence suppressedFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Carliovis Bandera-Valier v. State of Florida
Prior Bad Acts Evidence Admissible Under Modus Operandi ExceptionFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Damerius Kashon Hart v. State of Florida
Traffic stop lacked reasonable suspicion, evidence suppressedFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
JERRETT WILLIAMS GRAHAM, Individually and as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF RAJAH MALIK GRAHAM v. ORLANDO LODGE NO. 1079, BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. D/B/A ORLANDO FLORIDA ELKS LODGE 1079, and TAJH WILLIAMS, Individually
Elks Lodge owes duty of care in overdose death caseFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Patrick Maxwell v. State of Florida
Florida appeals court: Nervousness and marijuana smell insufficient for probable causeFlorida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24
-
Quintavis Jaquan Wilson v. State of Florida
Affirmed: Reasonable suspicion justified traffic stop, leading to drug conviction.Florida District Court of Appeal · 2026-04-24