State ex rel. Quinn v. Rastatter

Citation: 2026 Ohio 1208

Court: Ohio Supreme Court · Filed: 2026-04-07 · Docket: 2025-0965

Published

Impact Score: 0/100 — Low impact: This case is narrowly focused with minimal precedential value.

Case Overview

State ex rel. Quinn v. Rastatter is a court opinion from the Ohio Supreme Court, filed on 2026-04-07 (Docket No. 2025-0965).

Precedential Status: Published. This opinion may be cited as authority in future cases.

CaseLawBrief is currently processing this opinion through our AI enrichment pipeline to generate a comprehensive plain-English summary, key holdings analysis, entity extraction, and practical legal insights. The full analysis will include multiple perspectives for legal practitioners, students, and the general public.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Court Syllabus

Mandamus—Writ sought to compel rulings on motions pending before trial court—Request for writ granted to extent relator asks that trial-court judge be ordered to rule on motion for leave to file motion for new trial—Request for writ denied to extent relator asks that trial-court judge be ordered to rule on contemporaneously filed motion for new trial, because the two motions must be ruled on sequentially—Because trial-court judge denied the petition for postconviction relief after relator filed this mandamus action, that part of writ request is denied as moot—Writ granted in part and denied in part.

Case Details

Case Name	State ex rel. Quinn v. Rastatter
Citation	2026 Ohio 1208
Court	Ohio Supreme Court
Date Filed	2026-04-07
Docket Number	2025-0965
Precedential Status	Published
Impact Score	0 / 100
Jurisdiction	oh

Related Legal Resources

Ohio Supreme Court Opinions oh Jurisdiction Home Search Cases Is It Legal? 2026 Cases All Courts All Topics States Rankings

About This Analysis

This AI-generated analysis of State ex rel. Quinn v. Rastatter was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English.

CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Related Cases

Other opinions from the Ohio Supreme Court:

NC Ents., L.L.C. v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.
Railroad's use of spur line upheld under federal law

Ohio Supreme Court · 2026-04-24
State ex rel. Howard v. Chief Inspector's Office
BWC accreditation rule upheld; claimant denied medical reimbursement

Ohio Supreme Court · 2026-04-23
State v. Hill
Ohio Supreme Court: Peering through fence gap is unlawful search

Ohio Supreme Court · 2026-04-23
In re Complaint of Ohio Power Co v. Nationwide Energy Partners, L.L.C.
Court Rules Nationwide Not Obligated to Pay Ohio Power for Energy Credits

Ohio Supreme Court · 2026-04-22
State v. J.B.
Ohio Supreme Court: Sleep deprivation alone doesn't make confession involuntary

Ohio Supreme Court · 2026-04-22
State ex rel. Wright v. Madison Cty. Mun. Court
Acquitted defendant cannot be charged court-appointed counsel fees

Ohio Supreme Court · 2026-04-21
In re Resigantion of Greulich
Email resignation invalid if not filed with appointing authority

Ohio Supreme Court · 2026-04-17
Disciplinary Counsel v. VanBibber
Ohio Supreme Court Disbars Attorney for Neglect and Misconduct

Ohio Supreme Court · 2026-04-10