State ex rel. Stokes v. Combs

Citation: 2026 Ohio 1209

Court: Ohio Supreme Court · Filed: 2026-04-07 · Docket: 2025-0973
Published
Impact Score: 0/100 — Low impact: This case is narrowly focused with minimal precedential value.

Case Overview

State ex rel. Stokes v. Combs is a court opinion from the Ohio Supreme Court, filed on 2026-04-07 (Docket No. 2025-0973).

Precedential Status: Published. This opinion may be cited as authority in future cases.

CaseLawBrief is currently processing this opinion through our AI enrichment pipeline to generate a comprehensive plain-English summary, key holdings analysis, entity extraction, and practical legal insights. The full analysis will include multiple perspectives for legal practitioners, students, and the general public.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Court Syllabus

Mandamus—R.C. 2969.25(A)(2)—To avoid dismissal for failure to comply with R.C. 2969.25(A)(2), an inmate must identify and describe all federal and state civil actions and appeals of civil actions that the inmate filed in the previous five years—Appellant's affidavit of prior civil actions did not provide the case numbers for three appeals that he stated were filed within the previous five years—State ex rel. Harris v. Trelka followed—Court of appeals' dismissal of action affirmed.

Case Details

Case NameState ex rel. Stokes v. Combs
Citation2026 Ohio 1209
CourtOhio Supreme Court
Date Filed2026-04-07
Docket Number2025-0973
Precedential StatusPublished
Impact Score0 / 100
Jurisdictionoh

Related Legal Resources

Ohio Supreme Court Opinions oh Jurisdiction Home Search Cases Is It Legal? 2026 Cases All Courts All Topics States Rankings

About This Analysis

This AI-generated analysis of State ex rel. Stokes v. Combs was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English.

CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Related Cases

Other opinions from the Ohio Supreme Court: