Browse 6 service of process cases decided by California Court of Appeal. AI-powered summaries, holdings, and legal analysis.
Court Denies Writ to Dismiss Case Due to Good Cause for Service Delay
N.D. v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on January 20, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner sought a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to dismiss a ...
Writ of Mandate Denied: Service Extension Upheld
Harmon v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on January 20, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner, Harmon, sought a writ of mandate to compel the trial court to dism...
Writ of Mandate Granted: Trial Court Abused Discretion in Denying Dismissal
Cain v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on April 11, 2025, resulted in a remanded outcome. The petitioner, Cain, sought a writ of mandate to compel the trial court to dismiss a case ...
Writ of Mandate Denied: Court Upholds Trial Court's Service Ruling
Doe 3 v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on April 9, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner, Doe 3, sought a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court to dismis...
Court Denies Writ for Speedy Trial Violation
Jackson v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on March 21, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The plaintiff, Jackson, sought a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court to di...
Discovery Rule Applies to Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims
Jackson v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on February 28, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner, Jackson, sought a writ of mandate to compel the trial court to d...
CaseLawBrief currently tracks 6 service of process cases from California Court of Appeal. This number is updated as new opinions are published.
Outcome breakdown: Defendant Win: 5, Remanded: 1.
Each case page on CaseLawBrief includes an AI-generated plain English summary, key holdings, and legal analysis. Click any case above to read its full analysis.