Browse 14 speedy trial rights cases decided by California Court of Appeal. AI-powered summaries, holdings, and legal analysis.
Appellate Court Denies Writ for Speedy Trial Violation
Paknad v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on April 17, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner, Paknad, sought a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court to dis...
Arbitration Agreement Enforceable Despite Unconscionability Claims
Armstrong v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on March 27, 2026, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The plaintiff, Armstrong, sought a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court t...
Speedy Trial Violation Leads to Case Dismissal
Ayala-Ventura v. Superior Court, decided by California Court of Appeal on March 17, 2026, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The petitioner, Ayala-Ventura, sought a writ of mandate to compel the Sup...
Appellate court grants writ of mandate for speedy trial violation
Houser v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on December 12, 2025, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The petitioner sought a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to dismiss...
Appellate Court Denies Writ for Speedy Trial Violation
Angulo v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on September 16, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner, Angulo, sought a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court to...
Appellate Court Denies Writ for Speedy Trial Violation
Mendoza v. Superior Court, decided by California Court of Appeal on September 15, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner, Mendoza, sought a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Co...
Speedy Trial Rights Weighed Against Need for DNA Evidence
Arriaga v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on August 29, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner, Arriaga, sought a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court to ...
Court severs unconscionable arbitration terms, compels arbitration
Gomez v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on August 15, 2025, resulted in a mixed outcome. The plaintiff, Gomez, sought to compel arbitration of a dispute with the defendant, but the ...
Court: New charges in amended info must be supported by preliminary hearing evidence
Sanders v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on May 14, 2025, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The petitioner, Sanders, sought a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court to dis...
Arbitration agreement found unconscionable, denying employer's motion
Sanders v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on May 6, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner, a former employee, sought to compel arbitration of his wage and hour c...
Delay for Search Warrant Justifies Speedy Trial Denial
B.D. v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on April 30, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner, B.D., sought a writ of mandate to compel the superior court to dismiss...
Appellate Court Orders Dismissal of Criminal Case for Speedy Trial Violation
Goebner v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on April 30, 2025, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The petitioner sought a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to dismiss a...
Appellate Court Denies Writ for Speedy Trial Violation
McIntosh v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on March 28, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner, McIntosh, sought a writ of mandate to compel the superior court to...
Appellate Court Denies Writ for Speedy Trial Violation, Citing DNA Analysis
R.D. v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on February 19, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner, R.D., sought a writ of mandate to compel the superior court to dism...
CaseLawBrief currently tracks 14 speedy trial rights cases from California Court of Appeal. This number is updated as new opinions are published.
Outcome breakdown: Defendant Win: 8, Plaintiff Win: 5, Mixed: 1.
Each case page on CaseLawBrief includes an AI-generated plain English summary, key holdings, and legal analysis. Click any case above to read its full analysis.