Browse 6 expectation of privacy in vehicles cases decided by Georgia Supreme Court. AI-powered summaries, holdings, and legal analysis.
Georgia Supreme Court: Warrantless GPS Tracking Violates Fourth Amendment
GINES v. THE STATE (Three Cases), decided by Georgia Supreme Court on March 12, 2026, resulted in a mixed outcome. This case consolidated three appeals concerning the admissibility of evidence obtaine...
Georgia Supreme Court: Warrantless GPS tracking violates Fourth Amendment
FLAKES v. THE STATE (Two Cases), decided by Georgia Supreme Court on February 3, 2026, resulted in a mixed outcome. This case consolidates two appeals concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained...
GPS Tracking of Vehicles on Public Roads Permissible Without Warrant
SHELLS v. THE STATE (Two Cases), decided by Georgia Supreme Court on February 3, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. This case consolidates two appeals concerning the admissibility of evidence ...
Warrantless GPS tracking of vehicles violates Fourth Amendment, GA Supreme Court rules
UPSHAW v. THE STATE (Three Cases), decided by Georgia Supreme Court on January 5, 2026, resulted in a reversed outcome. This case consolidates three appeals concerning the admissibility of evidence ob...
Georgia Supreme Court Rules Warrant Required for GPS Vehicle Tracking
State v. ROMAN (Nine Cases), decided by Georgia Supreme Court on September 16, 2025, resulted in a reversed outcome. This case consolidates nine appeals concerning the admissibility of evidence obtain...
Georgia Supreme Court: Warrantless GPS Tracking Violates Fourth Amendment
CHAPMAN v. THE STATE (Two Cases), decided by Georgia Supreme Court on July 1, 2025, resulted in a mixed outcome. The Georgia Supreme Court addressed two consolidated cases concerning the admissibility...
CaseLawBrief currently tracks 6 expectation of privacy in vehicles cases from Georgia Supreme Court. This number is updated as new opinions are published.
Outcome breakdown: Mixed: 3, Defendant Win: 1, Reversed: 2.
Each case page on CaseLawBrief includes an AI-generated plain English summary, key holdings, and legal analysis. Click any case above to read its full analysis.