Furtive Gestures As Justification For Stops Cases in Ohio Court of Appeals

Browse 1 furtive gestures as justification for stops cases decided by Ohio Court of Appeals. AI-powered summaries, holdings, and legal analysis.

1
Cases
1
Defendant Win

Furtive Gestures As Justification For Stops Opinions from Ohio Court of Appeals (1)

State v. Scheaffer

Furtive Gesture Alone Insufficient for Traffic Stop

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-01-15 · Defendant Win · Impact: 30/100

State v. Scheaffer, decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on January 15, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision to suppress evidence seized f...

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How many furtive gestures as justification for stops cases has Ohio Court of Appeals decided?

CaseLawBrief currently tracks 1 furtive gestures as justification for stops cases from Ohio Court of Appeals. This number is updated as new opinions are published.

Q: What types of outcomes occur in furtive gestures as justification for stops cases at Ohio Court of Appeals?

Outcome breakdown: Defendant Win: 1.

Q: Where can I find plain English summaries of furtive gestures as justification for stops rulings from Ohio Court of Appeals?

Each case page on CaseLawBrief includes an AI-generated plain English summary, key holdings, and legal analysis. Click any case above to read its full analysis.

Explore More

All Ohio Court of Appeals Cases All Furtive Gestures As Justification For Stops Cases All Courts All Topics Search