Judge John R Tunheim's Rulings on Plan Administrator S Duty To Pay Benefits

Explore Judge John R Tunheim's 1 rulings on plan administrator s duty to pay benefits. AI-powered summaries and legal analysis.

1
Cases
1
Defendant Win

Courts

ca6 (1)

Judge John R Tunheim's Plan Administrator S Duty To Pay Benefits Opinions (1)

AMISUB (SFH), Inc. v. Cigna Health & Life Ins. Co.

Sixth Circuit: Non-participating provider cannot recover under ERISA plan.

Sixth Circuit · 2025-07-01 · Defendant Win · Impact: 30/100

AMISUB (SFH), Inc. v. Cigna Health & Life Ins. Co., decided by Sixth Circuit on July 1, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judg...

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How many plan administrator s duty to pay benefits cases has Judge John R Tunheim decided?

CaseLawBrief tracks 1 plan administrator s duty to pay benefits cases decided by Judge John R Tunheim. The count updates as new opinions are published.

Q: What is Judge John R Tunheim's ruling pattern on plan administrator s duty to pay benefits cases?

Based on tracked cases, outcomes include: Defendant Win: 1.

Q: Which courts has Judge John R Tunheim served on for plan administrator s duty to pay benefits cases?

Judge John R Tunheim has decided plan administrator s duty to pay benefits cases in: ca6.

Explore More

All Judge John R Tunheim Cases All Plan Administrator S Duty To Pay Benefits Cases All Judges All Topics Search