Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw's Rulings on Antitrust Law Relevant Market Definition

Explore Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw's 1 rulings on antitrust law relevant market definition. AI-powered summaries and legal analysis.

1
Cases
1
Mixed

Courts

ca9 (1)

Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw's Antitrust Law Relevant Market Definition Opinions (1)

Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Ninth Circuit largely sides with Apple on antitrust claims, but modifies injunction

Ninth Circuit · 2025-12-11 · Mixed · Impact: 75/100

Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc., decided by Ninth Circuit on December 11, 2025, resulted in a mixed outcome. The Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court's ruling in the a...

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How many antitrust law relevant market definition cases has Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw decided?

CaseLawBrief tracks 1 antitrust law relevant market definition cases decided by Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw. The count updates as new opinions are published.

Q: What is Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw's ruling pattern on antitrust law relevant market definition cases?

Based on tracked cases, outcomes include: Mixed: 1.

Q: Which courts has Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw served on for antitrust law relevant market definition cases?

Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw has decided antitrust law relevant market definition cases in: ca9.

Explore More

All Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw Cases All Antitrust Law Relevant Market Definition Cases All Judges All Topics Search