Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw's Rulings on Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization

Explore Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw's 1 rulings on sherman act section 2 monopolization. AI-powered summaries and legal analysis.

1
Cases
1
Mixed

Courts

ca9 (1)

Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw's Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization Opinions (1)

Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Ninth Circuit largely sides with Apple on antitrust claims, but modifies injunction

Ninth Circuit · 2025-12-11 · Mixed · Impact: 75/100

Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc., decided by Ninth Circuit on December 11, 2025, resulted in a mixed outcome. The Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court's ruling in the a...

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How many sherman act section 2 monopolization cases has Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw decided?

CaseLawBrief tracks 1 sherman act section 2 monopolization cases decided by Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw. The count updates as new opinions are published.

Q: What is Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw's ruling pattern on sherman act section 2 monopolization cases?

Based on tracked cases, outcomes include: Mixed: 1.

Q: Which courts has Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw served on for sherman act section 2 monopolization cases?

Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw has decided sherman act section 2 monopolization cases in: ca9.

Explore More

All Judge Kim Mclane Wardlaw Cases All Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization Cases All Judges All Topics Search