Judge Michelle T Friedland's Rulings on Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization

Explore Judge Michelle T Friedland's 2 rulings on sherman act section 2 monopolization. AI-powered summaries and legal analysis.

2
Cases
2
Defendant Win

Courts

ca9 (2)

Judge Michelle T Friedland's Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization Opinions (2)

Alivecor, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Alivecor's Antitrust Claims Against Apple

Ninth Circuit · 2026-01-08 · Defendant Win · Impact: 65/100

Alivecor, Inc. v. Apple Inc., decided by Ninth Circuit on January 8, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Alivecor's antitrust claims...

Popa v. Microsoft Corporation

Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Antitrust Claims Against Microsoft Edge

Ninth Circuit · 2025-08-26 · Defendant Win · Impact: 45/100

Popa v. Microsoft Corporation, decided by Ninth Circuit on August 26, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a class-action lawsuit all...

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How many sherman act section 2 monopolization cases has Judge Michelle T Friedland decided?

CaseLawBrief tracks 2 sherman act section 2 monopolization cases decided by Judge Michelle T Friedland. The count updates as new opinions are published.

Q: What is Judge Michelle T Friedland's ruling pattern on sherman act section 2 monopolization cases?

Based on tracked cases, outcomes include: Defendant Win: 2.

Q: Which courts has Judge Michelle T Friedland served on for sherman act section 2 monopolization cases?

Judge Michelle T Friedland has decided sherman act section 2 monopolization cases in: ca9.

Explore More

All Judge Michelle T Friedland Cases All Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization Cases All Judges All Topics Search