LEGAL TERM
A standard of judicial review under which a court upholds an agency action unless it is found to be unreasonable, illogical, or unsupported by evidence.
Arbitrary and Capricious Standard is a foundational legal concept that appears frequently in court opinions across federal and state jurisdictions. In legal practice, it refers to: A standard of judicial review under which a court upholds an agency action unless it is found to be unreasonable, illogical, or unsupported by evidence.
Courts have applied and interpreted arbitrary and capricious standard in numerous cases, shaping its legal meaning through judicial opinions. The concept plays a critical role in legal reasoning, affecting how judges analyze cases and reach decisions. CaseLawBrief tracks 2 court opinions that reference this legal concept, providing AI-powered summaries to help readers understand how arbitrary and capricious standard operates in practice.
The following court opinions reference or apply the legal concept of arbitrary and capricious standard. Each case provides real-world context for how courts interpret and apply this term.
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.