Comprehensive guide to Work Product Doctrine cases, courts, and legal analysis.
This case, Armstrong v. Superior Court, involved a dispute over whether a trial court could order a defendant to produce a privilege log that included information about the type of privilege being ass...
Martin Phipps, Individually and Phipps LLP v. Cord Largo, decided by Texas Court of Appeals on March 10, 2026, resulted in a reversed outcome. The dispute centered on whether Cord Largo, a former clie...
In Re General Motors, LLC v. the State of Texas, decided by Texas Court of Appeals on February 18, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. This case concerns whether the State of Texas could compel...
In Re Azhar Chaudhary Law Firm, PC; And Azhar M. Chaudhary v. the State of Texas, decided by Texas Court of Appeals on February 4, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. This case concerns the Sta...
In Re David L. Sheller v. the State of Texas, decided by Texas Court of Appeals on February 3, 2026, resulted in a dismissed outcome. The appellant, David L. Sheller, sought a writ of mandamus to comp...
The Renco Group Inc. and the Doe Run Resources Corporation v. Napoli Shkolnik PLLC, decided by Eleventh Circuit on January 21, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed ...
In Re State of Texas v. the State of Texas, decided by Texas Court of Appeals on January 14, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The State of Texas sought a writ of mandamus to compel the trial...
In Re State of Texas v. the State of Texas, decided by Texas Court of Appeals on January 14, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The State of Texas sought a writ of mandamus to compel the trial...
In re Thai, decided by California Court of Appeal on January 13, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, holding that the defendant's action...
STATE, DEP'T OF CORR. v. DIST. CT. (CAPERONIS) (CIVIL), decided by Nevada Supreme Court on November 13, 2025, resulted in a remanded outcome. The Nevada Supreme Court reviewed a District Court's order...
Matter of Hans-Gaston v. Sunshine, decided by New York Appellate Division on November 7, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner, Hans-Gaston, sought to compel the respondent, Sunshi...
Matter of Scanlon v. Miller-Williams, decided by New York Appellate Division on September 24, 2025, resulted in a mixed outcome. The petitioner sought to compel the respondent to produce certain finan...
In re: Sealed Case (PUBLIC REISSUED OPINION), decided by D.C. Circuit on September 24, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The D.C. Circuit reviewed a district court's order compelling a former...
State ex rel. Martin v. McCormick, decided by Ohio Supreme Court on September 23, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ohio Supreme Court considered whether a county court of appeals erred i...
The Kennedy Com. v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on September 11, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The plaintiff, Kennedy, sued the defendant, a superior court, for issu...
State ex rel. Castellon v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor's Office, decided by Ohio Supreme Court on August 12, 2025, resulted in a mixed outcome. This case concerns the Ohio Public Records Act and whether ...
In re Application of Notestine, decided by Ohio Supreme Court on July 8, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The applicant sought to compel the Ohio Secretary of State to provide certain voter ...
Citizen Action Def. Fund v. Off. of Fin. Mgmt., decided by Washington Supreme Court on June 26, 2025, resulted in a mixed outcome. The Citizen Action Defense Fund (CADF) sued the Office of Financial M...
In Re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Lindsey Nicole Dessart, decided by Texas Supreme Court on April 25, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. This case concerns whether an in...
Matter of Cipressi, decided by New York Appellate Division on April 7, 2025, resulted in a mixed outcome. The petitioner sought to compel the respondent to produce certain financial records related to...
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.