Explore 4 substantive unconscionability in contract terms court cases in California. AI-powered summaries, key holdings, and legal analysis.
Arbitration clause in rent-to-own home agreement deemed unconscionable
In re Mattison, decided by California Court of Appeal on December 8, 2025, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, affirmed the trial court's den...
Arbitration Agreement Found Unconscionable, Motion to Compel Denied
In re Mattison, decided by California Court of Appeal on November 7, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, affirmed a trial court's order...
Arbitration agreement found unconscionable and unenforceable
Hernandez v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on September 24, 2025, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The petitioner, a former employee, sought to compel arbitration of his wage a...
Unconscionable Arbitration Agreement Denied Writ of Mandate
McDaniel v. Super. Ct., decided by California Court of Appeal on May 19, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The petitioner, a former employee, sought a writ of mandate to compel the trial cour...
CaseLawBrief currently tracks 4 substantive unconscionability in contract terms cases from courts in California. New cases are added as opinions are published.
Courts deciding substantive unconscionability in contract terms cases in California include: calctapp (4 cases).
Outcome breakdown: Plaintiff Win: 2, Defendant Win: 2.