Explore 4 sufficiency of evidence to support jury verdict court cases in California. AI-powered summaries, key holdings, and legal analysis.
Prior Misconduct Evidence Admissible for Motive and Intent
People v. Dixon, decided by California Court of Appeal on February 13, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The defendant, Dixon, was convicted of second-degree murder and assault with a deadly ...
Prior Misconduct Evidence Admissible to Show Intent and Motive
People v. Dixon, decided by California Court of Appeal on January 26, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The defendant, Dixon, was convicted of second-degree murder and assault with a deadly w...
Prior Misconduct Evidence Admissible for Motive and Identity
People v. Reyes, decided by California Court of Appeal on July 16, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The defendant, Reyes, was convicted of second-degree murder and assault with a deadly weap...
Prior misconduct evidence admissible to prove identity and intent; conviction affirmed
People v. Benson, decided by California Court of Appeal on April 28, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The defendant, Benson, was convicted of second-degree murder and assault with a deadly w...
CaseLawBrief currently tracks 4 sufficiency of evidence to support jury verdict cases from courts in California. New cases are added as opinions are published.
Courts deciding sufficiency of evidence to support jury verdict cases in California include: calctapp (4 cases).
Outcome breakdown: Defendant Win: 4.