Explore 6 child protective services court cases in Ohio. AI-powered summaries, key holdings, and legal analysis.
Child Protective Services Opinions in Ohio (6)
Court Affirms Temporary Child Commitment Despite Lack of Relative Placement Consideration
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-03-11 · Defendant Win · Impact: 15/100
In re I.F., decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on March 11, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The case concerns the interpretation of Ohio Revised Code § 2151.353(A)(1), which allows for the te...
Ohio Court of Appeals: "No-Knock" Warrant Lacked Probable Cause
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-02-05 · Defendant Win · Impact: 75/100
In re C.K., decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on February 5, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ohio Court of Appeals considered whether a "no-knock" warrant was supported by sufficient pro...
Paternal grandparents granted permanent custody of child
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-01-28 · Defendant Win · Impact: 20/100
In re A.S., decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on January 28, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision to grant permanent custody of a chi...
Appellate Court Affirms Termination of Parental Rights
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-12-30 · Defendant Win · Impact: 20/100
In re G.B., decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on December 30, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The case concerns the termination of parental rights for G.B. The appellate court affirmed the t...
Court Affirms No-Contact Order Against Son
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-12-10 · Defendant Win · Impact: 20/100
In re S.L., decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on December 10, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ohio Court of Appeals considered whether a father's "no-contact" order against his son, S.L....
Court Reverses Child Dispositional Order for Untimely Permanency Hearing
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-10-29 · Reversed · Impact: 30/100
In re S.I., decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on October 29, 2025, resulted in a reversed outcome. The core dispute involved the interpretation of Ohio Revised Code § 2151.353(A)(1), which governs the ...