State v. McCarthy
or · 2026-04-23
State v. McCarthy, decided by Oregon Supreme Court on April 23, 2026, resulted in a remanded outcome. The core dispute in State v. McCarthy centered on whether the defendant's confession was voluntary...
Explore the legal landscape of Oregon. Browse courts, recent cases, top legal topics, notable judges, and landmark decisions in Oregon.
State v. McCarthy, decided by Oregon Supreme Court on April 23, 2026, resulted in a remanded outcome. The core dispute in State v. McCarthy centered on whether the defendant's confession was voluntary...
State v. Miller, decided by Oregon Supreme Court on April 23, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The core dispute in State v. Miller concerned whether the defendant's confession was voluntary ...
This case, State v. De Witt Simons, involved Mr. Simons appealing his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm. The core issue revolved around whether the trial court made a mistake by not allo...
This case involves a disciplinary action against attorney Robert Ersoff by the Oregon State Bar. Ersoff was found to have violated multiple rules of professional conduct, primarily related to his hand...
In State v. Monaco, the Oregon Supreme Court addressed the admissibility of a defendant's refusal to submit to a breath test as evidence in a driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) case. Th...
This case involves a disciplinary action against attorney Robert Ersoff by the Oregon State Bar. Ersoff was found to have violated multiple rules of professional conduct, primarily related to his hand...
This case, State v. Monaco, involved an appeal by Mr. Monaco from his conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine. Mr. Monaco argued that the trial court made a mistake by not allowing him t...
This case involves a dispute over a contract for the sale of a business. The buyer, Robinson, sued the seller, Hendricks, alleging that Hendricks misrepresented the financial condition of the business...
This case involves a defendant, Fletes, who was convicted of aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. The victim testified that Fletes attacked him with a knife during an argument. Fletes claimed self...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state could seize property from an individual, Mr. Roberts, who was accused of a crime. The court had to decide if the state's actions violated Mr. Robert...
This case involves a dispute between the Department of Human Services (DHS) and an individual identified as T.G. The specific details of the dispute are not provided in the excerpt, but it appears to ...
This case involves a defendant, McGee, who was charged with a crime. The core issue revolved around whether the jury instructions provided by the judge accurately reflected the law and adequately info...
This case involves a defendant, Ribas, who was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The victim testified that Ribas attacked him with a knife. Ribas claimed self-defense, arguing the ...
This case involves a dispute over whether the State of Oregon could seize a vehicle used in a drug-related crime. The owner of the vehicle, Mr. Strain, argued that his vehicle should not be forfeited ...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state could seize a vehicle used in a drug-related crime. The defendant, Worsham, argued that his vehicle should not be forfeited because he was unaware o...
This case involves a former employee, Hatton, who sued her employer, Sundquist, alleging wrongful termination and discrimination. Hatton claimed she was fired because she reported her supervisor's all...
This case involves a dispute over a contract for the sale of a business. The buyer, McEwen, claimed that the seller, Thrasher, misrepresented the financial condition of the business and breached the c...
This case involves a dispute between a former employee, Fletes, and their former employer, Thrasher. Fletes alleged that Thrasher wrongfully terminated their employment and failed to pay them for over...
This case involves a former employee of the Oregon Department of Transportation, Mr. Crandall, who sued the state alleging wrongful termination and discrimination. Mr. Crandall claimed that his termin...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state could seize property from an individual, Mr. Williams, who was accused of drug trafficking. The core legal question was whether the state had follow...
This case involves a dispute over a will. The court had to decide whether a handwritten document, signed by the deceased, was a valid will. The deceased's family argued that the document was not a val...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state could seize a vehicle used in a drug-related crime. The defendant, Mr. Williams, argued that the forfeiture of his car was an excessive fine, violat...