Explore court opinions related to admissibility-of-evidence. AI summaries of legal decisions in plain English.
This case involves Robert Lee Anthony appealing his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The core issue on appeal was whether the trial court properly admitted certain evidence, spe...
This case involves Carlos Franco Hernandez A/K/A Carlos Alberto Hernandez Orta appealing his conviction for aggravated sexual assault. The core of his appeal centers on the trial court's decision to a...
This case involves Francisco Gibran Morales, who was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to 20 years in prison. Morales appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial c...
This case involves K. Fountain, who was convicted of several charges including aggravated assault and strangulation after an incident with his girlfriend. Fountain appealed his conviction, arguing tha...
In People v. Bender, the New York Court of Appeals addressed the legal standard for determining when a defendant is 'in custody' for Miranda purposes, specifically in the context of a police interview...
In People v. Tyson, the New York Court of Appeals addressed the legal standard for determining whether a defendant is in custody for Miranda purposes when being questioned by law enforcement. The case...
In State v. Monaco, the Oregon Supreme Court addressed the admissibility of a defendant's refusal to submit to a breath test as evidence in a driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) case. Th...
In Commonwealth v. Ferguson, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court addressed the admissibility of a defendant's statements made during a custodial interrogation. The defendant, Ferguson, was arrest...
In Commonwealth v. Tanner, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts addressed the admissibility of a defendant's statements made during a custodial interrogation. The defendant, Tanner, was questio...
In People v. Morgan, the California Supreme Court addressed the admissibility of a defendant's statements made during a police interrogation. The defendant, Morgan, was questioned by police regarding ...
This case involves a defendant, Mr. Bolden, who was convicted of several crimes, including assault and battery. During his trial, the judge allowed certain evidence to be presented that the defense ar...