Explore court opinions related to criminal-law. AI summaries of legal decisions in plain English.
This case involves Anthony Small, Jr., who was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial...
This case involves Delray Antonio Montaque appealing his conviction for possession of cocaine and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Montaque argued that the evidence found during the traff...
This case involves Juan Daniel Nava appealing his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Nava argued that the trial court made several errors, including improperly admitting evidence ...
This case involves Robert Lee Anthony appealing his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The core issue on appeal was whether the trial court properly admitted certain evidence, spe...
This case involves a dispute between Morris Mitchell and the State of Texas. Mitchell was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and appealed his conviction. The core of his appeal was that the trial ...
This case involves Lorenza Lamar Stevenson appealing his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Stevenson argued that the trial court made several errors, including admitting evidence...
This case involves Christopher Joe Bradshaw, Sr. who was convicted of aggravated sexual assault. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made errors during his trial. Specifically, Br...
This case involves a dispute over a "no-contact" order issued against Brian Russell Turbeville. Turbeville was involved in a prior criminal case where he was convicted of aggravated sexual assault. As...
This case involves a dispute over whether Donald Sandstrum's attorney fees should be paid by the State of Texas. Sandstrum was convicted of aggravated sexual assault, but his conviction was later over...
This case involves Gavin Michael Riley, Jr., who was convicted of aggravated battery. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made several errors. Specifically, Riley claimed the judg...
This case involves Khalil Jahmarri Lang appealing his conviction for aggravated battery. Lang argued that the trial court made several errors, including admitting certain evidence and improperly instr...
This case involves Eric Darwin Dobson appealing his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Dobson argued that the trial court made several errors, including improperly admitting evide...
This case involves Leron De'Vonte Graham appealing his conviction for possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. Graham argued that the evidence found during a traffic ...
This case involves Matthew Kristian Hawkins appealing his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Hawkins argued that the trial court made several errors, including improperly admittin...
This case involves Richard Warren Hannans appealing a conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Hannans argued that the trial court made several errors, including improperly admitting ev...
This case involves Demetrius Demon Cook appealing his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Cook argued that the trial court made sev...
This case involves Edwin Alan Mills appealing a conviction for aggravated stalking. Mills argued that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to prove he committed the crime. Specifically, he...
This case involves Eric Francis Sandefur, who was convicted of aggravated stalking and resisting an officer without violence. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made several erro...
This case involves Fredis Garcia-Lopez, who was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the tria...
Reginald Verdell Daniels was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court erred by de...
This case involves Steven Allen Quarrells appealing his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. He argued that the trial court made several errors, including admitting evidence of prio...
This case involves a dispute over whether a defendant, Dakotah J. Lulei, could be charged with vehicular homicide while under the influence of alcohol. The prosecution argued that Lulei was driving un...
This case involves a dispute over a plea agreement in a criminal case. Yoham Bueno Delgado pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. As part of his plea, he agreed to a sentence of 10...
In this case, the State of Ohio charged Mr. Oatman with domestic violence. The alleged victim, Ms. Smith, initially reported the incident and identified Mr. Oatman as the perpetrator. However, during ...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio could seize a vehicle used in a drug-related crime. The owner of the vehicle, Cecil, argued that the seizure was unconstitutional because he...
This case involves a dispute over whether a defendant, Kirk, could be charged with a crime for allegedly violating a "no-contact" order. The order was put in place as part of a domestic violence case....
This case involves a dispute over whether a defendant, Caudill, could be charged with a crime for allegedly violating a "no-contact" order. The "no-contact" order was part of a domestic violence prote...
This case involves a dispute over a "no-contest" plea entered by the defendant, Mr. Fails, in a prior criminal case. Mr. Fails had been charged with several offenses, including domestic violence. He e...
This case involves Emanuel Matthew Williams, Jr., who was convicted of aggravated sexual assault. Williams appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made several errors. Specifically, he c...
This case involves a dispute over a "no-contest" plea agreement in a criminal case. Joe Flores pleaded "no contest" to charges, which means he did not admit guilt but agreed not to contest the charges...