State v. Blevins
ohioctapp · 2026-04-01
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Blevins's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Blevins's home based on information from a co...
Explore court opinions related to criminal-procedure. AI summaries of legal decisions in plain English.
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Blevins's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Blevins's home based on information from a co...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Wilson's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Mr. Wilson's home based on information that he...
This case involves Willie Styles III appealing a conviction for possession of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia. Styles argued that the evidence found during a traffic stop should have been...
This case involves Christopher Hardy, who was convicted of several crimes, including possession of child pornography. During his arrest, law enforcement seized various electronic devices. Hardy argued...
This case involves a dispute between Morris Mitchell and the State of Texas. Mitchell was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and appealed his conviction. The core of his appeal was that the trial ...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Florida properly handled a request for public records. Emanuel Huey Spence, Jr. sought records related to his criminal case. The state initially ...
This case involves Gavin Michael Riley, Jr., who was convicted of aggravated battery. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made several errors. Specifically, Riley claimed the judg...
This case involves a dispute over whether the State of Florida properly handled evidence in a criminal case. The defendant, Connor James Vidair, argued that the state failed to preserve potentially ex...
This case involves a dispute over a plea agreement in a criminal case. Yoham Bueno Delgado pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. As part of his plea, he agreed to a sentence of 10...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Davis's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Mr. Davis's home based on information that he w...
This case involves a dispute over a "no-knock" search warrant executed at the home of Mr. Lammie. Police suspected Lammie of drug trafficking and obtained a warrant that allowed them to enter without ...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Allen's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Allen's home based on information that he was i...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Davis's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Mr. Davis's home and vehicle, believing he was ...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Gregory's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Gregory's home and garage, believing he was invol...
This case involves Mr. Urizar-Mota, who was convicted of drug trafficking and money laundering. After his conviction, he filed a motion asking the court to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, ...
This case involved Mr. Hicks, who was convicted of a crime and later sought to have his conviction overturned based on new evidence. He filed a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, w...
In State v. Livingston, the Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision to deny Livingston's motion to suppress evidence. Livingston was charged with operating a vehicle while under the ...
This case involves Mr. Flannery, who was found guilty of domestic violence and assault. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made several errors. Specifically, he claimed that the ...
This case involved Valdimir Morrobel appealing his conviction for attempted second-degree murder with a firearm. Morrobel argued that the trial court made a mistake by not allowing him to present evid...
This case involves Mr. Seiker, who was found guilty of domestic violence and assault. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made several errors. Specifically, he claimed that the co...
This case involves Larry Eugene Bell, Jr.'s appeal of his conviction and sentence for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. Bell argued that the trial court made several errors, including denying h...
This case involves Mark Duane Hodges, who was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death. After his conviction and sentence were upheld on direct appeal, Hodges filed a motion for postcon...
This case involves Desmen Crawford, who was convicted of aggravated robbery. Crawford appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made several errors. Specifically, he claimed the judge impr...
This case involves Miguel Garcia Gonzalez, who was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to 15 years in prison. Gonzalez appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial co...
This case involved K.R.C., who was charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) and operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC), both as a fifth offense. K.R.C. filed a motion ...
In State v. Houston, the Maryland Supreme Court addressed whether a defendant's right to a speedy trial under Maryland Rule 4-271 was violated when the trial was postponed multiple times. The Court fo...
In State v. Thomas, the North Carolina Court of Appeals addressed the appeal of Mr. Thomas, who was convicted of various charges including felony breaking or entering, larceny, and being a habitual fe...
This case involves two separate appeals, Commonwealth v. Psikarakis and Commonwealth v. Smith, both concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained from cell phone tower location information (CTLI) ...
In State v. Calloway, the Washington Supreme Court addressed whether a defendant's right to a public trial was violated when the trial court conducted individual, in-chambers voir dire (jury selection...
This case involves Andrew Golobic, who was convicted of bank fraud and aggravated identity theft. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several errors, including failing to ...