Explore 24 court opinions on Deceptive Trade Practices. AI-powered plain English summaries, key holdings, and legal analysis.
24 recent cases analyzed in this topic area.
Court Rules Against Borrower in Loan Modification Dispute
Lumpkin v. Nutmeg State Financial Credit Union, decided by Connecticut Supreme Court on April 28, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The plaintiff, Lumpkin, sued Nutmeg State Financial Credit ...
AG's investigation into NIL deals not retaliatory, court rules
Female Athletes United v. Keith Ellison, decided by Eighth Circuit on April 15, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. Female Athletes United (FAU) sued Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, a...
Mortgage company not liable for OCSPA or FDCPA violations in modification dispute
Toth v. Rocket Mtge., L.L.C., decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on March 19, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The plaintiff, Toth, sued Rocket Mortgage for alleged violations of the Ohio Cons...
Appellate Court Affirms Summary Judgment for Auto Dealer in FDUTPA Case
Roahso Toussaint v. H Greg Auto Pompano, LLC, D/B/A HGREG LUX, decided by Florida District Court of Appeal on March 19, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The plaintiff, Roahso Toussaint, sued...
GEICO loses bid to recover overcharges from auto body shop
GEICO Ins. Co. v. Glendale Body Shop, Inc., decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on March 18, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. This case concerns whether GEICO Insurance Company could recover fu...
Loan servicer's statements not deceptive under FDUTPA, court rules
Anamary Bakhos Aponte v. Private Lending Group, LLC, decided by Florida District Court of Appeal on March 18, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The core dispute centered on whether a loan ser...
Ohio Appellate Court Affirms Summary Judgment for Quicken Loans in Debt Collection Case
Voss v. Quicken Loans, L.L.C., decided by Ohio Supreme Court on February 19, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The plaintiff, Voss, sued Quicken Loans alleging violations of the Ohio Consumer...
Arbitration clauses in car sales contracts upheld as enforceable
In Re Charlie Clark, Individually, Amaru Motors, L.P., Amaru Motors 2, LLC, Amaru Motors 3, LLC, Amaru Motors 5, LLC, and Amaru Motors 6, LLC v. the State of Texas, decided by Texas Court of Appeals o...
Grocery store's 'Buy 10, Get 10 Free' promotion not deceptive
John Mayo v. H-E-B, LP, decided by Texas Court of Appeals on January 14, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The plaintiff, John Mayo, sued H-E-B, LP, alleging that the grocery store's "Buy 10,...
Minnesota Attorney General's Office wins case against Madison Equities over deceptive trade practices
This case involves a dispute between the State of Minnesota, represented by its Attorney General, and Madison Equities, Inc., a company involved in property management. The core issue revolved around ...
Dealership's "Charlie's" Name Use Infringes on Prior User's Trademark
Charlie's CDJR, L.L.C. v. Charlie's Toledo, Inc., decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on January 6, 2026, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The core dispute centered on whether Charlie's Toledo, Inc. ...
Casino's duty to patron is tort, not contract, court rules
Macron Inv. Co. v. Jack Cleveland Casino, L.L.C., decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on November 20, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The core dispute involved whether a casino's alleged failu...
Eighth Circuit: "All-Risk" Policy Exclusion for Mold Upheld
Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Casualty Co., decided by Eighth Circuit on November 17, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant ...
Ninth Circuit: Slurpee cup sizes not deceptive under California law
Gilbert v. 7-Eleven, Inc., decided by Ninth Circuit on October 24, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a lawsuit alleging that 7-Ele...
Eighth Circuit: No Duty to Defend Fraud Claims Under Commercial Policy
Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Casualty Co., decided by Eighth Circuit on August 28, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of...
Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Lanham Act Claims Against Sanofi
Mosaic Health, Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC, decided by Second Circuit on August 6, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. Mosaic Health, Inc. challenged Sanofi-Aventis's marketing of its diab...
Class Action Decertified in Ford PowerShift Transmission Warranty Cases
Ford Motor Warranty Cases, decided by California Supreme Court on July 3, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. This case consolidated multiple warranty claims against Ford Motor Company concerni...
Huggies 'New and Improved' Claims Not Misleading, Court Rules
Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., decided by Second Circuit on July 1, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a class action lawsuit alleging that Kimberl...
Walmart's 'rollback' pricing not false advertising, court rules
Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. v. Walmart, Inc., decided by California Court of Appeal on June 30, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Consumer Advocacy Group (CAG) sued Walmart, alleging th...
Gruma Corp. Wins Appeal Over "Natural" Labeling of Tortillas
Charles Adler v. Gruma Corporation, decided by Third Circuit on April 16, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Third Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a class action lawsuit...
Exaggerated Marketing Claims Not Deceptive Under Washington CPA
Raab v. Nu Skin Enters., Inc., decided by Washington Supreme Court on March 27, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The plaintiff, Raab, alleged that Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. engaged in a dece...
Louisiana bettors' claims against racetracks dismissed for failure to state a claim
Consolidated With 2024-CA-0096 DONOVAN FREMIN, STAN GUIDROZ, WILLIAM EDWIN JUDSON, JR., LUKE LABRUZZO, JR., RAWLSTON PHILLIPS, III AND SALVADOR P. TANTILLO, III v. BOYD RACING, LLC, CHURCHILL DOWNS LO...
Auto dealer liable for fraud and breach of contract in undisclosed vehicle defects.
Connie Lange v. GMT Auto Sales, Inc., decided by Missouri Supreme Court on March 18, 2025, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The plaintiff, Connie Lange, sued GMT Auto Sales, Inc. for breach of con...
Amazon's FCRA compliance in employee investigations affirmed
Del Rio v. Amazon.com.dec.llc, decided by Second Circuit on March 17, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit alleging Amazon violated the Fai...