Explore 9 court opinions on Lanham Act. AI-powered plain English summaries, key holdings, and legal analysis.
9 recent cases analyzed in this topic area.
Dealership's Trademark Use in Ads Ruled Infringement
South Dade Dealership, LLC D/B/A South Dade Toyota v. Line 5 LLC and Carx Depot, LLC, decided by Florida District Court of Appeal on April 22, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The core dispu...
Law Search Infringes on 2222 Internatl.'s Trademark
2222 Internatl., L.L.C. v. Law Search, L.L.C., decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on January 15, 2026, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. This case concerns whether Law Search, L.L.C. infringed on 222...
Appeals Court Affirms Trademark Infringement Finding and Injunction
Versa-Pak, Ltd. v. Sispack Corp., decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on December 8, 2025, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The core dispute centered on whether Versa-Pak's "VERSA-PAK" mark infringed...
CAFC: No trademark infringement for 'Fortress' fence components
Barrette Outdoor Living, Inc. v. Fortress Iron, Lp, decided by Federal Circuit on October 17, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The case concerns whether Fortress Iron's "Fortress" trademark ...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Patent Infringement Case
C-Ville Fabricating, Inc. v. Joshua Tarter, decided by Sixth Circuit on August 20, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment ...
Former employee's internal complaints not protected speech under First Amendment
Jake Paul Heiney v. Donna Moore, decided by Sixth Circuit on August 13, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of a preliminary injunction so...
Painting company loses contract dispute on appeal
Skyline Tower Painting, Inc. v. Elizabeth Goldberg, decided by Fourth Circuit on August 1, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary ...
Court Affirms Imputed Income in Child Support Case
X.K. v. M.C., decided by California Court of Appeal on July 24, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The core dispute involved a father's challenge to a child support order, arguing that the cou...
Steak 'n Shake's "Big Shake" does not infringe Ramos's "Big Shake" trademark.
Steak N Shake, Inc. v. Wilfred Ramos, Jr., decided by Florida Supreme Court on July 10, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The core dispute centered on whether Steak 'n Shake's "Big Shake" was...