State v. Blevins
ohioctapp · 2026-04-01
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Blevins's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Blevins's home based on information from a co...
Explore court opinions related to search-and-seizure. AI summaries of legal decisions in plain English.
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Blevins's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Blevins's home based on information from a co...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Wilson's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Mr. Wilson's home based on information that he...
This case involves Christopher Hardy, who was convicted of several crimes, including possession of child pornography. During his arrest, law enforcement seized various electronic devices. Hardy argued...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Davis's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Mr. Davis's home based on information that he w...
This case involves a dispute over a "no-knock" search warrant executed at the home of Mr. Lammie. Police suspected Lammie of drug trafficking and obtained a warrant that allowed them to enter without ...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Allen's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Allen's home based on information that he was i...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Davis's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Mr. Davis's home and vehicle, believing he was ...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Gregory's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Gregory's home and garage, believing he was invol...
John Lozano was convicted of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several...
This case involves Harold Kaeding, who was convicted of possessing a firearm as a felon and possessing an unregistered firearm. Kaeding appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made se...
This case involved Patrick Opdahl, who was convicted of possessing child pornography. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several errors, including denying his motion to s...
This case involves D. Lee's appeal of his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and conspiracy. Lee argued that the trial court improperly denied his motion to sup...
This case involves Fabian, who was convicted of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute heroin and fentanyl, and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking cri...
This case involves Lawrence Alexander, who was convicted of possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. Alexander appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several errors. Specifica...
This case involves Michael Wayne Bailey, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition. Bailey appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several erro...
In United States v. Ferrari, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed the appeal of Mr. Ferrari, who was convicted of drug trafficking offenses. Ferrari argued that the district court erred in den...
Gabriel Aguirre was convicted of possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute and being a felon in possession of a firearm. He appealed, arguing that the district court should have suppressed ...
This case involves Bo Bryant Hostettler, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition. Hostettler appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several ...
This case involves two separate appeals, Commonwealth v. Psikarakis and Commonwealth v. Smith, both concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained from cell phone tower location information (CTLI) ...
This case involves Anthony Richard Smeby, who was convicted of first-degree controlled substance crime and fifth-degree controlled substance crime. Smeby appealed his convictions, arguing that the dis...
This case, Commonwealth v. Lane, E., from Pennsylvania, involved an appeal by the Commonwealth regarding the suppression of evidence. The trial court had granted the defendant's motion to suppress evi...
This case, People v. Jones, involved an appeal by Mr. Jones from his conviction for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. The primary issue on appeal was whether the police had probable...
This case involves Tayseer Yousef, who was convicted of bank fraud and aggravated identity theft. Yousef appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several errors, including failing...
This case involves Floyd Suggs, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition. Suggs appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several errors. Specif...
This case, United States v. Garcia, involved Mr. Garcia's appeal of his conviction and sentence for drug-related offenses. Garcia argued that the district court made several errors, including improper...
This case involves the State of Alabama's appeal of a trial court's decision to grant Brooklyn Paige Grimes's motion to suppress evidence. Grimes was charged with unlawful possession of marijuana and ...
This case involves the State of Alabama's appeal of a lower court's decision to grant Mason John Grimes's motion to suppress evidence. Grimes was charged with unlawful possession of marijuana and drug...
This case involves three separate appeals from the State Court of Gwinnett County, all concerning the same defendant, Mr. Gines. In each case, Mr. Gines was charged with driving under the influence (D...
This case involves a defendant, Parlin, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition. Parlin appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several error...
This case involves Mr. Wofford, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several errors. Specifica...