Sexually Oriented Business Regulations Cases

Explore 2 court opinions on Sexually Oriented Business Regulations. AI-powered plain English summaries, key holdings, and legal analysis.

2 recent cases analyzed in this topic area.

Courts Deciding Sexually Oriented Business Regulations Cases

texapp (1)ohioctapp (1)

Recent Sexually Oriented Business Regulations Opinions (2)

KamKane Enterprises, LLC v. City of Gholson, Eddie Oliver, Ric Maddox, Zach McFarland, Holley Herwig, Buck McAdams II, and Jonathan Spence

City zoning decision upheld; no due process or taking violation found

texapp · 2026-04-02 · Defendant Win · Impact: 25/100

KamKane Enterprises, LLC v. City of Gholson, Eddie Oliver, Ric Maddox, Zach McFarland, Holley Herwig, Buck McAdams II, and Jonathan Spence, decided by Texas Court of Appeals on April 2, 2026, resulted...

Richmond Hts. v. Turner

Zoning ordinance restricting sexually oriented businesses deemed unconstitutional

ohioctapp · 2025-11-26 · Reversed · Impact: 75/100

Richmond Hts. v. Turner, decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on November 26, 2025, resulted in a reversed outcome. The core dispute involved whether the City of Richmond Heights' zoning ordinance, which ...

Sexually Oriented Business Regulations by Court

Supreme Court First Circuit Second Circuit Third Circuit Fourth Circuit Fifth Circuit Sixth Circuit Seventh Circuit Eighth Circuit Ninth Circuit Tenth Circuit Eleventh Circuit D.C. Circuit Federal Circuit

Sexually Oriented Business Regulations by State

California Texas New York Florida Illinois Pennsylvania Ohio Georgia Michigan New Jersey Virginia Washington Massachusetts North Carolina

Related Resources

sexually-oriented-business-regulations Legal Definition sexually-oriented-business-regulations Practice Area Guide sexually-oriented-business-regulations Landmarks Home Search Cases States Courts Topic Rankings