Explore court opinions related to sufficiency-of-evidence. AI summaries of legal decisions in plain English.
This case involves Christopher Joe Bradshaw, Sr. who was convicted of aggravated sexual assault. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made errors during his trial. Specifically, Br...
This case involves Raul Eliss Dominguez, who was found to be a sexually violent predator and committed to a state facility. Dominguez appealed this commitment, arguing that the evidence presented by t...
This case involves Edwin Alan Mills appealing a conviction for aggravated stalking. Mills argued that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to prove he committed the crime. Specifically, he...
This case involves Eric Francis Sandefur, who was convicted of aggravated stalking and resisting an officer without violence. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made several erro...
This case involves Emanuel Matthew Williams, Jr., who was convicted of aggravated sexual assault. Williams appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made several errors. Specifically, he c...
This case, Bradberry v. State of Florida, involved Mr. Bradberry appealing his conviction for grand theft. The core issue revolved around whether the prosecution presented sufficient evidence to prove...
In State v. Beardsley, the defendant, Beardsley, appealed his conviction for domestic violence, arguing that the trial court made several errors. Beardsley claimed that the court improperly allowed ce...
This case involved Mr. Sweet, who was found guilty of domestic violence and abduction. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made several errors. Specifically, he claimed that the j...
In United States v. Myers, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed the appeal of Mr. Myers, who was convicted of various federal crimes. The core of his appeal revolved around challenges to the s...
This case involves Andrew Jay Porter, who was convicted of domestic abuse assault causing bodily injury. Porter appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several errors. Specifical...
This case involves Mr. Farler, who was found guilty of domestic violence and abduction. He appealed his conviction, arguing that there wasn't enough evidence to support the charges and that the trial ...
In this case, State v. Farwell, the defendant, Mr. Farwell, appealed his conviction for domestic violence. He argued that the trial court made several errors, including allowing certain evidence to be...
This case involved Mr. Windsor, who was found guilty of domestic violence and assault. He appealed his conviction, arguing that there wasn't enough evidence to support the domestic violence charge and...
This case involves Mark Suniga, who was convicted of aggravated sexual assault. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made several errors. Specifically, Suniga claimed that the evid...
This case involves Johnkenun Spivery, who was convicted of aggravated robbery. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made several errors. Specifically, Spivery claimed that the evid...
This case involves a dispute between Park Place Waco (and related entities) and the Wafford family concerning a student housing lease agreement. The Waffords, as guarantors for their daughter Emmalee'...
This case involves Veronica M. Hernandez's appeal against Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (PRA) regarding a default judgment. Hernandez sued PRA for various claims, including violations of the Texa...
This case involves Kevin Duane Owens, who was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to 10 years in prison. Owens appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made...
This case involves N.K., a child, who was found to be a neglected child by the trial court. The mother appealed this decision, arguing that the trial court's finding was not supported by sufficient ev...
This case involves E.J., a minor, who was found to be a person described under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 due to committing assault with a deadly weapon and misdemeanor battery. The juv...
In People v. Lye, the defendant, Mr. Lye, was convicted of aggravated battery with a firearm and sentenced to 15 years in prison. The case primarily revolved around the sufficiency of the evidence pre...
The case of State v. Ramirez involved Mr. Ramirez appealing his conviction for aggravated murder with a firearm specification, and tampering with evidence. He argued that the trial court made several ...
This case involves Mr. Arnett, who was convicted of several crimes, including aggravated assault, and sentenced to 10 to 20 years in prison. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court ma...
This case involves K. Fountain, who was convicted of several charges including aggravated assault and strangulation after an incident with his girlfriend. Fountain appealed his conviction, arguing tha...
This case involves Mr. Belgrave, who was convicted of several crimes, including aggravated assault and simple assault, after an incident where he allegedly assaulted his girlfriend, Ms. Johnson. The c...
This case involves Melissa Madelyne Zielinski, who was convicted of first-degree test refusal and fourth-degree driving while impaired (DWI) after refusing to take a blood test following a traffic sto...
This case involves Scot Perry Christian, who was convicted of first-degree premeditated murder and attempted first-degree premeditated murder. Christian appealed his convictions, arguing several point...
This case involves Fabian, who was convicted of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute heroin and fentanyl, and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking cri...
In United States v. Ferrari, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed the appeal of Mr. Ferrari, who was convicted of drug trafficking offenses. Ferrari argued that the district court erred in den...
Gabriel Aguirre was convicted of possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute and being a felon in possession of a firearm. He appealed, arguing that the district court should have suppressed ...