Browse 4 deceptive advertising cases decided by California Court of Appeal. AI-powered summaries, holdings, and legal analysis.
UCL doesn't apply to attorney advertising, court rules
County of Los Angeles v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, decided by California Court of Appeal on October 23, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The County of Los Angeles sued Quinn Em...
Adir International LLC's "all-natural" claims found deceptive under UCL
People v. Adir Internat., LLC, decided by California Court of Appeal on September 9, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding that Ad...
Court Affirms Dismissal of Pipe Defect Claims Under UCL and FAL
Bjoin v. J-M Manufacturing Co., decided by California Court of Appeal on August 25, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The plaintiff, Bjoin, sued J-M Manufacturing Co. for alleged violations o...
Court Rules Charter Communications Not Preempted by Federal Law on Internet Speeds
Hirdman v. Charter Communications, LLC, decided by California Court of Appeal on August 4, 2025, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The plaintiff, Hirdman, sued Charter Communications for alleged vi...
CaseLawBrief currently tracks 4 deceptive advertising cases from California Court of Appeal. This number is updated as new opinions are published.
Outcome breakdown: Defendant Win: 3, Plaintiff Win: 1.
Each case page on CaseLawBrief includes an AI-generated plain English summary, key holdings, and legal analysis. Click any case above to read its full analysis.