Deceptive Advertising Cases

Explore 14 court opinions on Deceptive Advertising. AI-powered plain English summaries, key holdings, and legal analysis.

14 recent cases analyzed in this topic area.

Courts Deciding Deceptive Advertising Cases

ca9 (6)calctapp (4)ohioctapp (2)ca5 (1)ca8 (1)

Recent Deceptive Advertising Opinions (14)

State ex rel. Yost v. Best Choice Industries, L.L.C.

Ohio Court Affirms Deceptive Advertising Ruling Against Weight-Loss Product Seller

ohioctapp · 2026-03-24 · Defendant Win · Impact: 25/100

State ex rel. Yost v. Best Choice Industries, L.L.C., decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on March 24, 2026, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ohio Attorney General sued Best Choice Industries (BC...

Intuit v. FTC

Fifth Circuit Blocks Intuit's Attempt to Halt FTC Deceptive Advertising Case, Citing Lack of Jurisdiction

ca5 · 2026-03-20 · Dismissed · Impact: 65/100

This case involves Intuit, the maker of TurboTax, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC had issued an administrative complaint against Intuit, alleging that Intuit engaged in deceptive adver...

Ohio Atty. Gen. v. Lager

Ohio AG Wins Against Deceptive Advertiser

ohioctapp · 2025-12-18 · Plaintiff Win · Impact: 25/100

Ohio Atty. Gen. v. Lager, decided by Ohio Court of Appeals on December 18, 2025, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The Ohio Attorney General sued the defendant, alleging that he engaged in deceptiv...

Federal Trade Commission v. Noland

Ninth Circuit: "Made in USA" claims must be truthful about foreign content

ca9 · 2025-11-24 · Plaintiff Win · Impact: 75/100

Federal Trade Commission v. Noland, decided by Ninth Circuit on November 24, 2025, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the...

Gilbert v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

Ninth Circuit: Slurpee cup sizes not deceptive under California law

ca9 · 2025-10-24 · Defendant Win · Impact: 15/100

Gilbert v. 7-Eleven, Inc., decided by Ninth Circuit on October 24, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a lawsuit alleging that 7-Ele...

County of Los Angeles v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

UCL doesn't apply to attorney advertising, court rules

calctapp · 2025-10-23 · Defendant Win · Impact: 40/100

County of Los Angeles v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, decided by California Court of Appeal on October 23, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The County of Los Angeles sued Quinn Em...

People v. Adir Internat., LLC

Adir International LLC's "all-natural" claims found deceptive under UCL

calctapp · 2025-09-09 · Defendant Win · Impact: 45/100

People v. Adir Internat., LLC, decided by California Court of Appeal on September 9, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding that Ad...

Ruiz v. the Bradford Exchange, Ltd.

Ninth Circuit Affirms TCPA Class Action Dismissal Over ATDS Pleading

ca9 · 2025-08-28 · Defendant Win · Impact: 25/100

Ruiz v. the Bradford Exchange, Ltd., decided by Ninth Circuit on August 28, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a class action lawsu...

Bjoin v. J-M Manufacturing Co.

Plastic Pipe Advertising Not Deceptive Under California Law

calctapp · 2025-08-25 · Defendant Win · Impact: 15/100

Bjoin v. J-M Manufacturing Co., decided by California Court of Appeal on August 25, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The plaintiff, Bjoin, sued J-M Manufacturing Co. for alleged violations o...

Hirdman v. Charter Communications, LLC

Court Rules Charter Communications Not Preempted by Federal Law on Internet Speeds

calctapp · 2025-08-04 · Plaintiff Win · Impact: 40/100

Hirdman v. Charter Communications, LLC, decided by California Court of Appeal on August 4, 2025, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The plaintiff, Hirdman, sued Charter Communications for alleged vi...

Narguess Noohi v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.

Ninth Circuit: 'Natural' and 'Gentle' Baby Shampoo Claims Not Misleading

ca9 · 2025-07-25 · Defendant Win · Impact: 15/100

Narguess Noohi v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., decided by Ninth Circuit on July 25, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a class ...

Custom Communications, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Eighth Circuit: "Free trial" offer was deceptive, FTC wins

ca8 · 2025-07-08 · Defendant Win · Impact: 65/100

Custom Communications, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, decided by Eighth Circuit on July 8, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summa...

Brandon Briskin v. Shopify, Inc.

Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Shopify Payments Fee Lawsuit

ca9 · 2025-04-21 · Defendant Win · Impact: 15/100

Brandon Briskin v. Shopify, Inc., decided by Ninth Circuit on April 21, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a class action lawsuit a...

Cahill v. Nike, Inc.

Ninth Circuit: Nike's 'Made to Play' ads not deceptive product claims

ca9 · 2025-03-18 · Defendant Win · Impact: 15/100

Cahill v. Nike, Inc., decided by Ninth Circuit on March 18, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a class action lawsuit alleging that...

Deceptive Advertising by Court

Supreme CourtFirst CircuitSecond CircuitThird CircuitFourth CircuitFifth CircuitSixth CircuitSeventh CircuitEighth CircuitNinth CircuitTenth CircuitEleventh CircuitD.C. CircuitFederal Circuit

Deceptive Advertising by State

CaliforniaTexasNew YorkFloridaIllinoisPennsylvaniaOhioGeorgiaMichiganNew JerseyVirginiaWashingtonMassachusettsNorth Carolina

Related Resources

Know Your Rights: deceptive-advertising deceptive-advertising Legal Definition deceptive-advertising Practice Area Guide deceptive-advertising Landmarks Home Search Cases States Courts Topic Rankings