Explore 4 deceptive advertising court cases in California. AI-powered summaries, key holdings, and legal analysis.
UCL doesn't apply to attorney advertising, court rules
County of Los Angeles v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, decided by California Court of Appeal on October 23, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The County of Los Angeles sued Quinn Em...
Adir International LLC's "all-natural" claims found deceptive under UCL
People v. Adir Internat., LLC, decided by California Court of Appeal on September 9, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding that Ad...
Court Affirms Dismissal of Pipe Defect Claims Under UCL and FAL
Bjoin v. J-M Manufacturing Co., decided by California Court of Appeal on August 25, 2025, resulted in a defendant win outcome. The plaintiff, Bjoin, sued J-M Manufacturing Co. for alleged violations o...
Court Rules Charter Communications Not Preempted by Federal Law on Internet Speeds
Hirdman v. Charter Communications, LLC, decided by California Court of Appeal on August 4, 2025, resulted in a plaintiff win outcome. The plaintiff, Hirdman, sued Charter Communications for alleged vi...
CaseLawBrief currently tracks 4 deceptive advertising cases from courts in California. New cases are added as opinions are published.
Courts deciding deceptive advertising cases in California include: calctapp (4 cases).
Outcome breakdown: Defendant Win: 3, Plaintiff Win: 1.