State v. Blevins
ohioctapp · 2026-04-01
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Blevins's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Blevins's home based on information from a co...
Explore court opinions related to fourth-amendment. AI summaries of legal decisions in plain English.
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Blevins's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Blevins's home based on information from a co...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Wilson's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Mr. Wilson's home based on information that he...
This case involves Christopher Hardy, who was convicted of several crimes, including possession of child pornography. During his arrest, law enforcement seized various electronic devices. Hardy argued...
This case involves a dispute over whether a minor, identified as S.A.B., was unlawfully detained by law enforcement. The minor's parents sued the State of Florida, alleging that the detention violated...
Reginald Verdell Daniels was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court erred by de...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Davis's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Mr. Davis's home based on information that he w...
This case involves a dispute over a "no-knock" search warrant executed at the home of Mr. Lammie. Police suspected Lammie of drug trafficking and obtained a warrant that allowed them to enter without ...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Allen's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Allen's home based on information that he was i...
This case involves a dispute over whether the state of Ohio properly seized evidence from Mr. Davis's property. The police obtained a search warrant for Mr. Davis's home and vehicle, believing he was ...
This case involves Harold Kaeding, who was convicted of possessing a firearm as a felon and possessing an unregistered firearm. Kaeding appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made se...
This case involved Patrick Opdahl, who was convicted of possessing child pornography. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several errors, including denying his motion to s...
This case involved K.R.C., who was charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) and operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC), both as a fifth offense. K.R.C. filed a motion ...
This case involves D. Lee's appeal of his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and conspiracy. Lee argued that the trial court improperly denied his motion to sup...
This case involves Latasha Rouse, who sued Matthew Fader, a police officer, alleging that he used excessive force against her during an arrest. The incident occurred when Officer Fader responded to a ...
This case involves Lawrence Alexander, who was convicted of possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. Alexander appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several errors. Specifica...
This case involves Chong Lee, who sued Bradley Mlodzik, a police officer, under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 for excessive force and false arrest. Lee alleged that Mlodzik used excessive force during an arrest fo...
This case involves Michael Wayne Bailey, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition. Bailey appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several erro...
In United States v. Ferrari, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed the appeal of Mr. Ferrari, who was convicted of drug trafficking offenses. Ferrari argued that the district court erred in den...
Gabriel Aguirre was convicted of possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute and being a felon in possession of a firearm. He appealed, arguing that the district court should have suppressed ...
This case involves Dillon Michael Heiller's appeal of his conviction for operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), first offense. Heiller was stopped by a police officer who observed him driving er...
This case involves Bo Bryant Hostettler, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition. Hostettler appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several ...
This case involves Jimmy Timberlake, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Timberlake appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several errors. He claimed ...
This case involves two separate appeals, Commonwealth v. Psikarakis and Commonwealth v. Smith, both concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained from cell phone tower location information (CTLI) ...
This case, Commonwealth v. Lane, E., from Pennsylvania, involved an appeal by the Commonwealth regarding the suppression of evidence. The trial court had granted the defendant's motion to suppress evi...
This case, People v. Jones, involved an appeal by Mr. Jones from his conviction for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. The primary issue on appeal was whether the police had probable...
This case involves Floyd Suggs, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition. Suggs appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several errors. Specif...
This case, United States v. Garcia, involved Mr. Garcia's appeal of his conviction and sentence for drug-related offenses. Garcia argued that the district court made several errors, including improper...
This case involves Christopher Joseph Hidlebaugh, who was convicted of operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), third offense. Hidlebaugh appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court s...
This case involves Terrell Lamar Williams, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition. Williams appealed his conviction, arguing that the district court made several ...
This case involves Keith Edwards, who sued Officer J. Grubbs under Section 1983, alleging excessive force during an arrest. Edwards claimed that Officer Grubbs used a taser on him without justificatio...