State v. Windsor

Headline: Appeals Court Affirms Domestic Violence and Assault Convictions Against Windsor

Citation: 2026 Ohio 1075

Court: Ohio Court of Appeals · Filed: 2026-03-27 · Docket: 2025-CA-31

Published

Outcome: Defendant Win

Impact Score: 40/100 — Low-moderate impact: This case addresses specific legal issues with limited broader application.

Legal Topics: domestic-violence criminal-law evidence excited-utterance sufficiency-of-evidence

Case Summary

This case involved Mr. Windsor, who was found guilty of domestic violence and assault. He appealed his conviction, arguing that there wasn't enough evidence to support the domestic violence charge and that the trial court made a mistake by allowing certain evidence to be presented. The appeals court reviewed the evidence and found that there was sufficient proof to show that Mr. Windsor knowingly caused physical harm to his girlfriend, which constitutes domestic violence. The court also determined that the trial court properly allowed the girlfriend's statements to be used as evidence, as they were made under stressful circumstances immediately after the incident. Therefore, the appeals court upheld Mr. Windsor's convictions.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Court Syllabus

Any error as to the form of appellant's indictment, to which there was no objection, did not constitute plain error. The verdict forms were neither erroneous nor incomplete. Appellant was correctly designated a violent offender. The trial court did not err in the admission of video tape evidence. Appellant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err by not merging appellant's convictions of attempted murder and discharge of a firearm on or near prohibited premises. Judgment affirmed.

Key Holdings

The court established the following key holdings in this case:

Sufficient evidence existed to support a conviction for domestic violence where the defendant knowingly caused physical harm to a family or household member.
A trial court does not abuse its discretion by admitting excited utterances under Evid.R. 803(2) when the statements relate to a startling event or condition and were made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.

Entities and Participants

Parties

Windsor (party)
State (party)

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.

Basic Questions (5)

Q: What was this case about?

This case was an appeal by Mr. Windsor of his convictions for domestic violence and assault, arguing insufficient evidence and improper admission of evidence.

Q: What were the main arguments made by Mr. Windsor?

Mr. Windsor argued that there was not enough evidence to prove domestic violence and that the trial court should not have allowed his girlfriend's statements to be used as evidence.

Q: How did the appeals court rule on the sufficiency of evidence for domestic violence?

The appeals court found that there was sufficient evidence to support the domestic violence conviction, as the testimony showed Mr. Windsor knowingly caused physical harm to his girlfriend.

Q: What is an 'excited utterance' in legal terms?

An 'excited utterance' is a statement made under the stress of excitement caused by a startling event, which can be admitted as evidence even if it's hearsay, because the stress of the event makes it likely to be truthful.

Q: What was the final decision of the appeals court?

The appeals court affirmed Mr. Windsor's convictions for domestic violence and assault, upholding the trial court's decisions.

Case Details

Case Name	State v. Windsor
Citation	2026 Ohio 1075
Court	Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Filed	2026-03-27
Docket Number	2025-CA-31
Precedential Status	Published
Outcome	Defendant Win
Impact Score	40 / 100
Legal Topics	domestic-violence, criminal-law, evidence, excited-utterance, sufficiency-of-evidence
Jurisdiction	oh

Related Legal Resources

Ohio Court of Appeals Opinions domestic-violence criminal-law evidence excited-utterance sufficiency-of-evidence oh Jurisdiction Know Your Rights: domestic-violence Know Your Rights: criminal-law Know Your Rights: evidence Home Search Cases Is It Legal? 2026 Cases All Courts All Topics States Rankings domestic-violence Guide criminal-law Guide domestic-violence Topic Hub criminal-law Topic Hub evidence Topic Hub

About This Analysis

This AI-generated analysis of State v. Windsor was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English.

CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Related Cases

Other opinions on domestic-violence or from the Ohio Court of Appeals:

Alfonso Verduzco Ruiz v. Pamela Bondi
Ninth Circuit Upholds "No-Contact" Rule in Domestic Violence Case

Ninth Circuit · 2026-04-01
State v. Oatman
Ohio appellate court reverses domestic violence conviction due to improper admission of victim's prior inconsistent statement

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-03-30
State v. Kirk
Defendant's awareness of no-contact order sufficient for criminal charges, despite service issues

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-03-30
State v. Caudill
Defendant convicted for violating a valid no-contact order.

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-03-30
State v. Fails
Defendant cannot withdraw no-contest plea after being informed of consequences

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-03-30
State v. Reed
Ohio Appeals Court Affirms Probation Revocation and Prison Sentence for Domestic Violence Offender

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-03-27
State v. Beardsley
Appellate Court Affirms Domestic Violence Conviction, Upholding Admission of Victim's Statements and Prior Bad Acts

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-03-27
State v. Mayes
Appeals Court Upholds Domestic Violence and Abduction Convictions Against Mayes

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-03-27