Reginald Verdell Daniels v. State of Florida

Headline: Appellate Court Upholds Conviction After Finding Traffic Stop Lawful

Citation:

Court: Florida District Court of Appeal · Filed: 2026-03-31 · Docket: 5D2025-0949
Published
Outcome: Defendant Win
Impact Score: 35/100 — Low-moderate impact: This case addresses specific legal issues with limited broader application.
Legal Topics: criminal-lawtraffic-stopsmotion-to-suppressfourth-amendmentreasonable-suspicion

Case Summary

Reginald Verdell Daniels was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence. Daniels claimed that the evidence found during a traffic stop should have been suppressed because the stop was unlawful. The appellate court reviewed the facts surrounding the traffic stop and the legal standards for such stops. Ultimately, the court found that the police had a lawful basis to stop Daniels' vehicle, and therefore, the evidence obtained was admissible. The conviction was upheld.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Key Holdings

The court established the following key holdings in this case:

  1. A traffic stop is lawful if the police have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed.
  2. Evidence obtained during a lawful traffic stop is admissible in court.

Entities and Participants

Parties

  • Reginald Verdell Daniels (party)
  • State of Florida (party)

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Comprehensive Q&A covering every aspect of this court opinion.

Basic Questions (4)

Q: What was Reginald Verdell Daniels convicted of?

Reginald Verdell Daniels was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.

Q: What was the main argument on appeal?

Daniels argued that the trial court should have suppressed the evidence found during a traffic stop because the stop itself was unlawful.

Q: What did the appellate court decide regarding the traffic stop?

The appellate court found that the police had a lawful basis to stop Daniels' vehicle.

Q: What was the final outcome of the appeal?

The appellate court upheld Daniels' conviction.

Case Details

Case NameReginald Verdell Daniels v. State of Florida
Citation
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeal
Date Filed2026-03-31
Docket Number5D2025-0949
Precedential StatusPublished
OutcomeDefendant Win
Impact Score35 / 100
Legal Topicscriminal-law, traffic-stops, motion-to-suppress, fourth-amendment, reasonable-suspicion
Jurisdictionfl

Related Legal Resources

Florida District Court of Appeal Opinions criminal-lawtraffic-stopsmotion-to-suppressfourth-amendmentreasonable-suspicion fl Jurisdiction Know Your Rights: criminal-lawKnow Your Rights: traffic-stopsKnow Your Rights: motion-to-suppress Home Search Cases Is It Legal? 2026 Cases All Courts All Topics States Rankings criminal-law Guidetraffic-stops Guide criminal-law Topic Hubtraffic-stops Topic Hubmotion-to-suppress Topic Hub

About This Analysis

This AI-generated analysis of Reginald Verdell Daniels v. State of Florida was produced by CaseLawBrief to help legal professionals, researchers, students, and the general public understand this court opinion in plain English.

CaseLawBrief aggregates court opinions from CourtListener, a project of the Free Law Project, and enriches them with AI-powered analysis. Our goal is to make the law more accessible and understandable to everyone, regardless of their legal background.

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May contain errors. Consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.

Related Cases

Other opinions on criminal-law or from the Florida District Court of Appeal: